Dell SC Series vs NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Dell Technologies and NetApp are both solutions in the All-Flash Storage category. Dell Technologies is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0, while NetApp is ranked #29. Dell Technologies holds a 1.5% mindshare in AFS, compared to NetApp’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

The NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays and Dell SC Series are two prominent products in the realm of storage solutions. NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays are preferred for pricing and support, whereas Dell SC Series stands out in features, making it worth the higher price.

Features: NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays are praised for their high performance, scalability, and quick deployment, suitable for enterprises with demanding data needs. Dell SC Series stands out for efficient data reduction capabilities, comprehensive data services, and advanced management and automation.

Room for Improvement: NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays can benefit from enhanced integration with cloud environments, improved reporting tools, and better scalability options. Dell SC Series could improve on initial setup complexity, better documentation, and an easier upgrade process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays are noted for quick deployment and responsive customer service. Dell SC Series deployment can be more complex and time-consuming, though it offers robust customer support.

Pricing and ROI: The NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays are seen as having competitive setup costs and deliver a strong ROI due to their performance and reliability. Dell SC Series, while having higher initial costs, justifies its pricing with extensive features and data reduction efficiencies, leading to a favorable ROI in users' views.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell SC Series vs. NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Dell SC Series vs. NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Everpure FlashArray

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the All-Flash Storage category, the mindshare of Everpure FlashArray is 6.7%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell SC Series is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

All-Flash Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Everpure FlashArray	6.7%
Dell SC Series	1.5%
NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays	1.4%
Other	90.4%

All-Flash Storage

Featured Reviews

Sowjanya MV

Technical Lead at Wipro Limited

Has improved performance for mission-critical workloads and enabled seamless non-disruptive upgrades

The availability is 99.99%, which is the main factor any customer would need because their data should be available whenever they want to access it. This is one main critical thing. It is very easy to upgrade since Pure Storage FlashArray handles it well. Everything is non-disruptive now; previously, there were forklift shifts, but now that is not the case. Pure Storage FlashArray says no to forklift upgrades. Usually hardware requires downtime, but Pure Storage FlashArray has improved their footprint so that they are not asking for downtime; everything is just a non-disruptive activity, which is why customers are more inclined towards Pure Storage FlashArray. Customers want more of the models in their environment due to the performance they are giving, and everything is in one Pure1 Array console where we can view all the models on one page or just an orchestration tool. You don't miss anything; you have replication, notifications about replication, and details about which host groups replication is happening in and if that replication is successful or failed. On a daily basis, our purpose is to create volumes for infrastructure; our daily activities include creating volumes and mapping them to the host, doing any migrations from a VM, clearing the data stores, and carving the volumes to those VMs. One key factor is the data compression with a ratio of 5:1, focusing on space efficiency, inline deduplication, and the compression Pure Storage FlashArray works on; that is a major factor we can suggest to any customer. Analytical capabilities are crucial. Daily, we check the throughput and consumption, and Pure Storage FlashArray provides predictions for one year regarding usage. This prediction helps plan updates well ahead. For support, we just raise a case, and they follow up and get it done. There is also AI readiness, but with the model R2, we don't have much of that AI readiness. For others, we do have AI readiness that predicts capacity based on daily or monthly trends, enabling us to analyze how much space we need or if we need to expand the disk shelf. From an operational point of view, a good feature is that if you accidentally delete a volume, it will be retained in the destroyed state for the next twenty-four hours, which is not the same with any other vendor. I have worked in this storage domain for the past fifteen years, and this option is remarkable, benefiting any L1 or L2 engineer. Additionally, from a compliance perspective, Pure Storage FlashArray has REST APIs enabled. I have not explored automation much, but from a security standpoint, it is strong with encryption data. If you want to automate, you can easily integrate with all clouds and explore Pure Cloud for scheduling workloads, including volume creation. Customers find benefit in Pure Storage FlashArray's single management pane of glass due to the dual controller and active-active setup. If one of the controllers goes down, all workloads automatically shift to the other controller, ensuring their data is safe and accessible at all times. This is a highlighted feature that any customer desires because their data should always be accessible. For SAN workloads, we use Pure Storage FlashArray because for SAN FC fiber channel, we don't use it; we use NetApp for NAS activities. We have clearly split this, so SAN is for mission-critical applications, while network-attached storage handles file systems. This architecture helps us maximize the benefit from Pure Storage FlashArray due to the significant workloads from this giant retail client. From a footprint and energy consumption perspective, you can see energy consumption from the Pure1 storage portal on a daily basis, and it is very compact. The three models we use consume only three units, which is quite low. From a footprint and data center perspective, it doesn't occupy much space. As everything moves to cloud, there are requirements to avoid excess spending on data centers, and Pure Storage FlashArray is efficient in energy consumption and is environmentally friendly.

Read full review

Ramnesh Kumar

System Administrator at Lovely Professional University

Storage solutions accommodate diverse drives and offers good resiliency

Technical support is good. I can log complaints online through the portal and have engineers in line. I can also take dedicated engineers if needed, although this involves a different support cost. As far as my requirements are concerned, it is working fine. There are two or three types of support. Standard support involves logging a complaint and receiving a call from the OEM on the same day, but hardware replacement takes two to three days. Advanced support offers instant replacement without delays. Hardware support terms include calling or emailing the company or logging the call in the portal to receive remote support, or getting a dedicated engineer or account manager from Dell.

Read full review

Tayo Olubanke

Managing Director at GCET

Offers flexibility and top-notch technology

You can go to bed peacefully if you have a NetApp. If you have NetApp within your data center, you get to know about power failure if you are using it. Your NetApp will still come alive. Even if it does not come alive, I can say that it is not like other tools when it comes to dealing with power failure. The tool is affordable, and the technology is top-notch. It is the only technology that has software for what we call inline compression and deduplication. All the products under NetApp are aiming to use AI. I know that you can achieve whatever you want to do with NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the data reduction rates. That has been really helpful. You get 4U of Pure storage replacing something like two racks of spinning disks. One of the things that has contributed to that are the data reduction rates."

"The biggest return on investment for us is not having to do a swap out of the arrays every five years."

"The most valuable feature is its data reduction."

"Everpure FlashArray has positively impacted my organization by increasing our agility and the ability to run our environment at high speeds due to the flash storage."

"The management features are well organized and they have a very good dashboard."

"After installing Pure, the processes that would take 40 minutes to two hours to complete are now done in five minutes."

"It comes with a large number of features out-of-the-box, which makes it easy for us to see problems and manage capacity."

"It does efficient work of storing data while still delivering the performance that you would normally expect from a higher priced solution."

More Everpure FlashArray pros

"The performance was staggering and it was more than what we paid for."

"It's very scalable, especially with federation. If you outgrow the number of spindles that a unit can support, depending on the model, you can go into federation."

"It has good dedupe and compression. Also, the built-in data migration capabilities are pretty good, as is the federation. When we started migrating the workloads from different storage platforms, like NetApp and XtremeIO, it helped us in moving to that direction."

"Dell SC Series' most valuable features are performance and network facilities. We have no issues with its integration. The tool helps to visualize servers."

"Simplicity and stability are very important for me, and this solution is very simple to use, it's very efficient and a customer won't make many mistakes when using it."

"Easy management of volumes: You can create volumes and easily assign them to VMware clusters, increasing their size."

"With mixed workloads, we are seeing at least a 15 to 20 percent improvement."

"It is just as stable as any other high-end solution."

More Dell SC Series pros

"I would have to say performance at this point, because the application it is based on is so diverse."

"The hardware and software of NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays are easy for us to use."

"Go with the NetApp EF-series All Flash Arrays, if you want good quality, reliability, speed and size."

"Having the option of such high-speed storage in the data center is what makes it valuable."

"You can't beat it for the price."

"The benefits are better up-time, better response time."

"The solution allows us to segregate one storage unit from another."

"The management software is very good."

More NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays pros

Cons

"We would like to see better troubleshooting aspects. It helps us if we can find out where the problem is. Right now, it's difficult. Sometimes it's difficult to pinpoint the issue. If they had more visibility and more troubleshooting feature built into the tool that would really help."

"Going forward, don't complicate things for the customers."

"The data reduction that we had initially anticipated when we bought Pure and we move over, is way lower than the expected reduction. It depends on the workloads, of course. But that has been a challenge at times."

"I would like to see data tiering to AWS."

"The price of this solution is high and should be lowered."

"I think replication is one area that still needs improvement."

"FlashArray could improve on the administrative side. For example, when you need to upgrade the boxes, we can't do that ourselves. We need to open a ticket with support and have them do that for us. You don't need to be on the call with them. We tell them we have a slot that we want to upgrade, and they send us an email when it's done."

"I would like some performance analytics which go deeper than today. It should be specific to some hosts and applications. This would be good."

More Everpure FlashArray cons

"While the scalability is good, there are certain limitations. Our racks are at their limit, so we do not have the requisite scalability to expand."

"This system is not a good fit for most customers. It's not only the fact that it's too old, but it has not developed any more since Dell bought it."

"In terms of what could be improved, I would say the lack of reporting would be the main issue."

"Customer support could be improved. It takes five or six reps to finally get someone who can help us."

"In the future, I want any box that comes on-premises to have the provision to integrate with cloud storage."

"We need more discount, but it's good."

"Honestly, we were initially struggling with the integration with VMware (but it was fixed with the VMware 6.5) and, then, it was around a 10GB network."

"I would like to see an integrated key manager in the controllers. Currently, it's an external product. It would be nice to have the option of having a built-in key for self-encrypting drive features."

More Dell SC Series cons

"Obviously to a small, medium size business, you're probably not going to recommend it because it's probably overkill."

"I guess the user interface could be a little more streamlined."

"I would like to shrink it more, if we can. The smaller, the better."

"It was difficult to implement and lacks some additional features that would be useful, but as a solution fits a particular need for our organization."

"The EF-Series is not the most scalable solution."

"It says NetApp on the badge, but it’s not a NetApp product."

"As far as the manageability, being able to port between the two and have to do less training in-house from a customer point of view, that would be the part to improve."

"There could be better integration with some of our Cisco products."

More NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We feel that the pricing is fair and the licensing process was easy for both."

"The price of the Pure Storage Flash Array is too high and there needs to be more contact clarity. We went with the Evergreen plan and I don't have clarity on what am I supposed to pay each year or every three years. There was not much contract clarity."

"Price is about the only thing that's wrong with it. A little bit better pricing would be great."

"There is an annual or perpetual license required for this solution."

"Pure is not a cheap product. It is not something that is inexpensive. But, the total cost of ownership tends to be lower than with other solutions, because you don't need a lot of expertise, you don't need a lot of training or very expensive engineers or very expensive consultants."

"We implemented Pure Storage FlashArray nine years ago when it was new to the market and obtained it at a preferential price."

"The cost of Pure Storage is subjective and determined by your environment. Pure Storage tends to be more expensive than NetApp, but it is cheaper than EMC. Performance varies with data workload, making cost considerations complex."

"In the beginning, we saw that the price is not very good. When we made some compilations about the deduplication and the compression and what the equipment does, including the differentiation of upper management of the storage, the price was not so bad. However, in the beginning, the price was very difficult to justify."

More Everpure FlashArray pricing and cost advice

"The scalability seems a bit more expensive than even buying a brand new one so far. That has been kind of a drawback."

"We have found it to be affordable. Comparing the cost with other hardware, it seems to be right in line with the compute and the storage that we get with it."

"We have reviewed many platforms over the years. It is probably the best solution for its value."

"It's a very affordable solution."

"We have found the solution to be affordable."

"It has a good price point and offers some value-added enterprise features."

"We have the basic license for the use of this solution and it is a permanent license. The overall cost could be less, it is expensive."

"The maintenance is usually pretty good. It's not like some of the others where they increase it in the fourth, fifth, or sixth years."

More Dell SC Series pricing and cost advice

"Adding more capacity will increase the cost."

"It's a lot cheaper than what the other vendors have for the same type of environment. It saves us money."

"This solution is not available to many users because the cost is very expensive."

"Price-wise, NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays is costlier than Dell. You have to buy a lot of licenses separately."

"They need to improve its pricing. The storage market is dying. So, they need to improve the price because it should reach all people. NetApp is one of the top ones, and they are charging a little bit of royalty as compared to other storage solutions."

"The pricing of the solution is expensive, considering the initial investment required...At the end of the product's life cycle, it could get cheaper, but the initial investment in NetApp makes it one of the most expensive solutions."

"Most of my customers pay for the license on a yearly basis. It can be expensive depending on the capacity number."

"The cost of our license is approximately $200,000 over three years for NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays. There can be additional costs for storage. For example, if you want to have eight terabytes."

More NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which All-Flash Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	71
Midsize Enterprise	38
Large Enterprise	159

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

Which should I choose: HPE 3PAR StoreServ or Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series?

Both are great platforms, but if you are considering all flash solutions, I would recommend you to consider Pure Stor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage FlashArray?

I find the pricing of Everpure FlashArray to be quite high compared to other storage solutions; however, the reliabil...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage FlashArray?

I believe we have covered the most important features; the architecture of Pure Storage is essential, and features su...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell SC Series?

In our case, we received favorable pricing with Dell because of our strong partnership. While I acknowledge that Dell...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell SC Series?

For us, it is a great product. The deduplication and compression could potentially be improved, though they are alrea...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dell SC Series?

We use Dell SC Series in a VMware environment.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

NetApp AFF vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 10% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 6% of the time

VAST Data vs Everpure FlashArray

Compared 6% of the time

More Everpure FlashArray Competitors

Dell Unity XT vs Dell SC Series

Compared 9% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs Dell SC Series

Compared 8% of the time

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Dell SC Series

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp AFF vs Dell SC Series

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs Dell SC Series

Compared 4% of the time

More Dell SC Series Competitors

NetApp AFF vs NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

Compared 11% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

Compared 10% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

Compared 9% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

Compared 5% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Everpure FlashArray

September 2026

Download Everpure FlashArray product report

Buyer's Guide

Dell SC Series

September 2026

Download Dell SC Series product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

September 2026

NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays report

Download NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays product report

Also Known As

Pure Storage FlashArray

SC Series Storage, Compellent

NetApp EF540, NetApp EF-Series

Overview

The FlashArray family delivers consistent, high-performance data services across block, file, and object workloads. As part of the Everpure Platform, it provides the foundation for a unified data plane, enabling applications to reliably access, protect, and manage data across environments with simplicity and predictability. With built-in capabilities such as inline data reduction, snapshots, replication, and ransomware resilience, FlashArray ensures efficient operations, protected data, and consistent application uptime.

As the foundation of the (unified) data plane, FlashArray enables policy-driven automation, monitoring, and centralized management while integrating across cloud and on-premises environments. Built on an Evergreen architecture, it supports non-disruptive upgrades and continuous performance improvements over time while simplifying operations at scale.

What Key Features Does FlashArray Offer?

Simplicity and Speed: Easy management and rapid performance enhancements.
Data Reduction: Effective deduplication and compression.
Flash Architecture: Seamless upgrades and outstanding resilience.
VMware Integration: Excellent compatibility with virtualization platforms.
Predictive Analytics: Strong insights for proactive management.

What Benefits Should Users Consider?

Reliability: Proactive support with minimal downtime.
Efficiency: Reduced storage footprint and enhanced data management.
Performance: Faster processing speeds and low latency.
User Experience: Simplified management with Evergreen model.

In industries like finance, banking, and healthcare, FlashArray supports high-performance storage needs focusing on virtualization and database environments. Employed for VMware workloads, disaster recovery, and storage provisioning, it ensures application performance in private or hybrid cloud setups while enhancing management of virtualized environments.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

Dell SC Series provides a high-performance, cost-effective storage solution with ease of management and robust support. Users appreciate its scalability, flexibility, and efficient storage management, making it a reliable platform for diverse environments.

Renowned for its key attributes such as auto-tiering, replication, compression, and deduplication, Dell SC Series enhances scalability through Live Migrate and high availability features. Its efficient management with thin provisioning and data progression enhances resource utilization. The series is favored for stability, reliability, and integration capabilities, making it suitable for diverse deployments like private and public clouds, production workloads, virtual environments, large databases, and more.

What are the key features of Dell SC Series?

Auto-tiering: Optimizes performance by automatically moving data between storage tiers.
Replication: Ensures data protection and disaster recovery.
Compression and deduplication: Reduces storage costs and optimizes space.
Live Migrate: Facilitates seamless data movement without downtime.
High availability: Provides continuous access and performance.
Thin provisioning and data progression: Increases efficiency in managing storage resources.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall storage expenses.
Ease of management: Simplifies administration through intuitive control.
Scalability: Expands to meet growing data needs seamlessly.
Flexibility: Integrates with different environments, supporting varied use cases.
Reliability: Delivers stable performance and dependable service.

Dell SC Series serves as a versatile storage solution across industries, supporting applications in converged infrastructure, disaster recovery, and VMware environments. Users rely on its performance for critical business applications such as Oracle and SQL file systems, maintaining its relevance and effectiveness in ever-changing technological landscapes.

Dell Technologies

NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays excels in high-performance storage with fast speeds and low latency, suitable for demanding environments like databases. It offers simplified management and integration, making it an efficient and reliable choice for data-intensive tasks.

NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays provides robust storage for applications needing exceptional IOPS and low power usage. Renowned for ease of integration and management, they seamlessly fit into existing infrastructures. While known for dependable performance in SQL and Oracle databases, they are popular for blending ease of use with advanced storage capabilities. However, the need for larger and faster drives, improved NVMe integration, and a more intuitive interface remains. Desired features also include enhanced monitoring, smooth cloud integration, comprehensive encryption, and clearer licensing.

What are the key features of NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays?

High Performance: Delivers high speed and low latency for demanding applications like SQL databases.
Management Simplicity: Streamlines deployment and integration for hassle-free management.
Diverse Connectivity: Offers various connectivity options to fit into different infrastructures.
Cost-Effective: Balances affordability with robust performance and reliability.

What benefits should you look for when evaluating NetApp EF-Series?

Improved IOPS: Boosts application performance with high IOPS capabilities.
Low Power Consumption: Reduces operational costs with efficient energy usage.
Reliable Database Access: Ensures consistent performance for critical applications.
Comprehensive Integration: Enhances compatibility within diverse IT environments.

In industry-specific implementations, companies utilize NetApp EF-Series in virtualized environments and private clouds, often incorporating hybrid models. It's prevalent in sectors like banking, oil and gas, and gaming, where speed and dependability are critical. Tech consultancies deploy these arrays for diverse data management tasks, including CCTV solutions.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Nielsen, Lamar Advertising, LinkedIn, Betfair, UT-Dallas

TGen, Frost Science, Gerrie Electric

RP Data, Western Oregon University, Toei Animation

Buyer's Guide

Dell SC Series vs. NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

September 2026

Free Report: Dell SC Series vs. NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell SC Series vs. NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell SC Series vs. NetApp EF-Series All Flash Arrays report.

See our list of best All-Flash Storage vendors.

We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.