Device42 vs KACE Asset Management Appliance comparison

Device42 and Quest Software are both solutions in the IT Asset Management category. Device42 is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Quest Software is ranked #18. Device42 holds a 4.1% mindshare in IAM, compared to Quest Software’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Device42 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Device42

Read 34 Device42 reviews

4,548 Views
2,047 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Read 7 KACE Asset Management Appliance reviews

940 Views
940 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Device42

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Device42 and KACE Asset Management Appliance are competing in IT asset management. Based on data comparisons, Device42 excels in feature robustness, while KACE is favored for cost-effectiveness and customer support.

Features: Device42 offers comprehensive asset discovery and dependency mapping, agentless discovery, and integration capabilities with cloud services. It provides detailed application dependency data and network device discovery, beneficial for cloud migration and management. KACE Asset Management Appliance is known for its user-friendly dashboard, remote control for systems, and automated compliance reporting.

Room for Improvement: Device42 could enhance its user interface for easier navigation and improve the speed of asset discovery in large environments. Users have also suggested better integration with non-standard IT assets. KACE could benefit from expanding its feature set to include more advanced asset discovery and dependency mapping. Users have noted that its reporting features could be more robust, and enhancing these could improve its value proposition.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Device42 provides flexibility with both cloud and on-premises deployment options, supported by thorough documentation and support. It offers customization options but may require more technical expertise. KACE is praised for its straightforward setup and accessible customer support, making it a good choice for businesses seeking easy deployment and minimal ongoing management complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Device42 may have higher initial costs but offers long-term ROI with features suited for complex infrastructures, ideal for organizations prioritizing comprehensive IT management. KACE provides a cost-effective solution with quick implementation, appealing to organizations prioritizing budget and simplicity.

To learn more, read our detailed Device42 vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Device42 vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Device42

Ranking in IT Asset Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Configuration Management Databases (2nd), IP Address Management (IPAM) Tools (3rd), Data Center Infrastructure Management (1st)

KACE Asset Management Appli...

Ranking in IT Asset Management

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IT Asset Management category, the mindshare of Device42 is 4.1%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KACE Asset Management Appliance is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Asset Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Device42	4.1%
KACE Asset Management Appliance	1.9%
Other	94.0%

IT Asset Management

Featured Reviews

Manmohan Rao

Associate Vice President at Hitachi Systems India Private Limited

Granular discovery has ensured confident workload migration and optimized cloud move group planning

Device42 offers the best features for workload assessment, particularly useful for cloud-to-cloud workload or on-premise data center workload, especially when planning for workload migration to the public cloud. For application and infrastructure discovery, Device42 has enabled me to know the number of machines running in the on-premise environment and has managed to capture complete utilization metrics or trends of their utilization. This has benefited me in right-sizing systems for my public cloud total cost of ownership (TCO) planning, providing me granularity to right-size these systems while planning a migration to the public cloud. Device42 has positively impacted my organization by providing granularity toward application discovery compared to other assessment tools, which is a differentiator since none of the other tools provide such granularity, leading to better decision-making for my migration to the public cloud. Device42 has improved my migration projects by providing granularity around system dependencies that gave me confidence knowing which systems communicate with each other parked in a particular move group. My move group planning became so robust that I am not leaving any system behind in the on-premise data center from my planning, which saves a lot of time and effort, leading to cost optimization—a value addition.

Read full review

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Remote control and massive deployment streamline operations efficiently

It seems that it is a bit difficult to learn and purchase. The requirement for employees to be certified before purchasing is understandable yet can be a hurdle. A focus on more simplicity and user-friendly features would be beneficial. More training deals, up-to-date articles, and improved documentation would help users navigate the solution more intuitively.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is agentless."

"Device42 positively impacts my organization because we build the as-is as soon as possible, avoiding the delays we would face with the network or security teams, and I captured more than 100 traffic entries in just two weeks, which was great."

"Device42 has everything in one place and links it altogether, which helps when you need to figure out where things are going wrong, where things are happening, or how everything is linked together."

"The auto-discovery is brilliant. You can have it scheduled to run on a regular basis, and the infrastructure is always getting updated within the platform. I would rate the asset discovery very highly. It's very comprehensive. It covers quite a lot of different methods for doing discovery and it supports a lot of different types of hardware as well."

"Device42 is a fantastic tool for workload discovery, and I believe everyone should start using it if they have plans to do so; it is a top-notch tool in the market."

"Asset management is a difficult, time consuming thing, however, Device42 has helped me streamline that so I can focus on other areas that need improvement."

"Device42 will be our single point of truth, and only Device42."

"Device42 has everything in one place and links it altogether. This helps when you need to figure out where things are going wrong, where things are happening, or how everything is linked together."

More Device42 pros

"We use the solution for IT service desk management and asset management."

"We utilize the package management feature the most. We also use it for getting the inventory. Companies like us don't have an inventory or asset management system per se. A lot of companies, for instance, use SCCM as their asset management tool. We are using Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance for asset management, which is a good feature. The feature that I really like is to be able to upgrade to the Windows management systems or Windows version. It is very seamless, and I have found it fairly good."

"The platform offers efficient stability."

"The inventory in Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance is very valuable."

"We utilize the package management feature the most, and we also use it for getting the inventory, and we are using Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance for asset management, which is a good feature."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance is highly stable."

"The solution is scalable."

"Remote control and massive deployment for fixing bugs and issues on multiple computers and systems at once are highly valued."

More KACE Asset Management Appliance pros

Cons

"The reporting could be better. The Insights+ component is an improvement, but they even admit it isn't the greatest. The documentation on their website could also be improved, but Device42 is constantly changing, so the documentation would have to change almost daily."

"It would be nice for the agent to have an installer versus a single file across multiple systems."

"Mapping items wasn't as intuitive as importing in Device42, so this is an area for improvement."

"For the iPhone, the device diagram cannot be downloaded. You have to go to each device and download the device diagram for that device. E.g., suppose there are a 1000 or 2000 servers. You cannot go to each server or device to download a device diagram for each device. There should be a one-click solution for downloading all device diagrams."

"I think the graphical representation of all associated machines needs improvement to better illustrate how these systems have dependencies on each other."

"While the automatic IT asset discovery is great, the first time using it can be confusing when you are configuring the SNMP. I don't remember for sure but I don't think it said "SNMP community," it said "password". The first time I used it I was thinking about communities but the tool said "password," and when you say "password" in SNMP you are thinking about SNMP version 3. This is the only thing that is confusing, although there were some devices that were not included in the discovery."

"The resources table needs a few tweaks. We've raised a feature request for this. When you click on resources, it opens up the entire CMDB or the entire data stored in Device42. If that could be customizable, it would be good. We should be allowed to add our own columns to that by writing a script or something like that. There should be an option to add or limit whatever we want."

"For the iPhone, the device diagram cannot be downloaded. You have to go to each device and download the device diagram for that device."

More Device42 cons

"It seems that it is a bit difficult to learn and purchase."

"The remote desktop tool they are using needs improvement. They have integrated some third-party tools for remote desktop connections but that is a bit complicated."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance can improve by incorporating AI and machine learning into the solution."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance could improve areas related to the management of updates, especially concerning new operating systems."

"The initial setup was burdensome for us because we manually deployed it."

"The first thing I don't like about KACE is that it needs to have a proper service desk. The categories and the command section do not reflect the users and the permanent users porting commands on updating. There is an issue and delay in loading the commands. We also want a proper structure for infrastructure management. Also, the AI chatbot and user template options are missing."

"The price of the solution is high, it would be beneficial if it was more flexible and less expensive."

"Sometimes, it feels like the inventory it takes is not 100% accurate. I would say it is correct 90% of the time. We have had some issues. So, we have to rely on some factors of inconsistency in the data."

More KACE Asset Management Appliance cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's in the top-three most expensive solutions in terms of cost, but it has all the features that are needed."

"We pay $100,000 per year."

"I am not involved in its pricing, but I have seen their plans during a discussion with the customer. For 500 servers, they were asking 50,000 USD. The cost of BMC Discovery was less than half. For the same thing, they were charging only 10,000 USD. Its pricing needs to be improved. As compared to other discovery tools, such as BMC Discovery and ServiceNow Discovery, its price is a little bit higher."

"The problem with using other vendor, like BMC, is the pricing. The price is so horrible and nobody wants to pay this money."

"The product cost is low. It is quite cheap."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"Functionality-wise, Device42 is on par with industry standards, but price-wise, the solution is expensive. I'm rating the pricing for the solution as eight out of ten."

"On a yearly basis, our licensing is $10,000. However, our license is now nearly full with devices. We need the next bigger license with 5,000 devices, which will cost us $19,000. We pay for a set of licenses, a maximum number of devices, and a maximum number of IP addresses. We have the smallest amount of features, which is enough for us at this time."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

"It is less expensive as compared to SCCM."

"Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance provides two remote desktop licenses which are helpful. The price of the solution is high, it would be beneficial if it was more flexible and less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Asset Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Device42?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Device42 are relatively cost-effective and affordable. I do not know if a small organization would be able to afford it, but I presume it would also be co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Device42?

I think Device42 can be improved by adding more features around the CMDB aspect and lifecycle management. I do not think many people use it for that functionality, but if they were to expand the su...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Device42?

My main use case for Device42 is that we use it as a CMDB and affinity map to check out network topology or determine when we need to decom something in a life cycle. We use it for many different p...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

They are maybe on the higher end, however, their solutions suit bigger companies well. Building a solution out of smaller packages could end up being more expensive. Their pricing corresponds to th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest KACE Asset Management Appliance?

I am more on the sales side of the business, so I do not use it that much. However, companies with more than fifty employees already need such a tool, especially if they have more than twenty-five ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Freshservice vs Device42

Compared 8% of the time

ServiceNow CMDB vs Device42

Compared 8% of the time

NetBox.dev vs Device42

Compared 7% of the time

Faddom vs Device42

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow vs Device42

Compared 5% of the time

More Device42 Competitors

ServiceNow vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 23% of the time

InvGate Assets vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 19% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 17% of the time

Freshservice vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 12% of the time

BMC Track-It! vs KACE Asset Management Appliance

Compared 5% of the time

More KACE Asset Management Appliance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Device42

May 2026

Download Device42 product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Asset Management

April 2026

Download KACE Asset Management Appliance product report

Also Known As

No data available

KACE Asset Management Appliance, KACE Asset Management

Overview

Device42 empowers enterprises with automatic IT asset discovery, application dependency mapping, and agentless discovery, streamlining asset management, improving decision-making, and supporting migration initiatives.

Device42 automates network discovery and provides comprehensive IT data management, making it indispensable for asset and infrastructure management. The platform’s integration capabilities, such as with ServiceNow, allow seamless management of physical and virtual environments. Its application dependency mapping is a critical feature for efficient cloud migration, while advanced search and dashboards enhance operational tasks. Device42's ease of deployment coupled with integration into cloud services offers robust operational insights and simplifies onboarding.

What are Device42's key features?

Automatic IT Asset Discovery: Enables detailed information collection on hardware and software.
Application Dependency Mapping: Facilitates tracking of application dependencies for effective cloud migration.
Agentless Discovery: Assists in uncovering assets without the need for specialized agents.
Network Topology Visualization: Assists in visual representation of network connections.
Cloud Integration: Simplifies the integration with cloud services for enhanced insights.

What benefits should be evaluated in Device42?

Improved Decision-Making: Optimizes resource utilization and boosts strategic initiatives.
Seamless Integration: Enhances connectivity with platforms like ServiceNow.
Efficiency in Auditing: Eases compliance and auditing processes.
Simplified Onboarding: Streamlines initial setups and deployment.
Enhanced Operational Insights: Supports better management through comprehensive data visualization.

Device42 is widely used across sectors for IT asset and infrastructure management, where automation in inventory and documentation aids compliance and resource optimization. It excels in industries requiring integration with existing systems and comprehensive network solutions. Application dependency mapping bolsters cloud migration efficiency in enterprise environments.

Device42

KACE Asset Management Appliance enhances asset usability with popular package management and inventory features, ideal for companies that lack systems. The tool provides seamless Windows upgrades, remote control, and deployment, making it essential for businesses managing multiple devices.

KACE Asset Management Appliance provides streamlined asset management, featuring prominent package management and inventory functionalities that support seamless Windows upgrades and remote control for bug fixing. Users greatly value its capabilities for remote printer work and automated compliance reporting. Suggested improvements include enhanced remote desktop integration, more precise inventory accuracy, and effective service desk features. Simplifying these elements, integrating AI for better image management and operating system deployment would enhance its effectiveness. Updated documentation, user-friendly features, and enhanced training are needed to overcome learning challenges and certification requirements.

What are the most important features of KACE Asset Management Appliance?

Usability with Low Learning Curve: Makes it accessible for organizations with limited IT resources.
Package Management and Inventory: Popular features for streamlined asset management.
Remote Control and Deployment: Allows for effective bug fixes across multiple devices.
Automated Compliance Reporting: Ensures up-to-date compliance without manual intervention.
Remote Printer Work: Facilitates management of remote printing tasks.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Consolidated Data Management: Combines data from multiple desktops and laptops.
Efficient IT Service Desk Management: Supports efficient handling of service desk tasks.
Seamless System Upgrades: Simplifies upgrading systems to new Windows releases.
Private Cloud Integration: Essential for organizations working within private cloud environments.
Scalability for Large Distributed Workforce: Suitable for businesses with over fifty employees and multiple clients.

This appliance is frequently implemented by companies for deploying Windows and non-Windows patches, managing IT service desks and assets, and facilitating software installations. Common within private cloud environments, it supports businesses managing over fifty employees, numerous clients, and a distributed workforce who need consolidated data management for effective IT operations.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Computershare, Concur, Doosan, Fitch Ratings Inc., Fujitsu, HomeAway, Jasper Wireless, Mercedes-Benz, Square, Twitch, UCSB, Zayo Group Inc.

Coastal Community Credit Union, St. Dominic Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Device42 vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

April 2026

Free Report: Device42 vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance

Find out what your peers are saying about Device42 vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Device42 vs. KACE Asset Management Appliance report.

See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.