No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Devo vs Evanios comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Devo enhances data analysis and threat detection cost-effectively, offering scalability, customization, and efficiency in resource allocation.
Sentiment score
9.1
Evanios improved event visibility, reduced IT hours, increased system reliability, and provided over 100% ROI with up to 90% noise reduction.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Devo's customer service is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, but some seek better documentation and clarity in ticket handling.
Sentiment score
8.9
Evanios offers exceptional customer service and technical support, known for rapid, knowledgeable assistance and a proactive, friendly approach.
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten because of their timely technical guidance and responsiveness during the deployment and troubleshooting periods.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
Both response time and support quality need attention.
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Devo's cloud-based architecture ensures impressive scalability, efficiently managing large data volumes and integrating users across regions without limitations.
Sentiment score
8.6
Evanios is highly scalable, effectively handling diverse applications through flexible rules and configurations despite occasional bottlenecks.
Devo is a unified SIEM solution designed to handle growing log volumes and enterprise-scale monitoring requirements.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Devo is praised for its stability, reliable uptime, proactive support, and effective management of large deployments despite minor issues.
Sentiment score
8.7
Users praise Evanios for its stability and reliability, marking significant improvement over previous platforms with no reported issues.
It is stable and reliable for our security operations.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
 

Room For Improvement

Devo's Activeboards need better customization, integration, UI, and AI capabilities, while cost and usability require attention.
Evanios needs better alert management, integration, and cost efficiency, leading users to consider alternatives like PagerDuty for added features.
The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so.
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
UI improvements, a simplified dashboard, or an easier reporting workflow could further improve analyst productivity.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
This is particularly evident when dealing with failed login attempts and determining true versus false positives.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
 

Setup Cost

Devo offers transparent pricing per gigabyte, with potential metadata charges, including 400-day storage and additional feature benefits.
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps.
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Valuable Features

Devo impresses with real-time analytics, intuitive UI, customization, advanced alerting, cloud-native architecture, and 400 days of data retention.
Evanios offers powerful, flexible event processing with seamless ServiceNow integration, user-friendly rule types, and adaptable JavaScript manipulation.
When the analyst uses queries to search, it pulls the data quickly, in a second, which aids us greatly with the investigation.
Cyber Security Engineer Ii (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Devo has 400 days of hot storage and you can draw your attack chain from more than a year if you are hunting for threats.
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (18th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (18th), AIOps (13th)
Evanios
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
17th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (16th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (64th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Devo is 4.6%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Evanios is 3.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Operations Analytics Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Devo4.6%
Evanios3.2%
Other92.2%
IT Operations Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead SOC at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response
Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.
DM
Director at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Customizable solution that provides the ability to ingest alerts from different systems
The price could be cheaper. That was one reason why we switched to PagerDuty. We wanted to switch to something that provided the same features but at a lower cost. We also switched because PagerDuty provided other features like integration with ServiceNow and the scheduling of engineers. Evanios was only for event integration. Evanios created too much noise. For every alert, it would create an incident. We received too many alerts and incidents from monitoring. It wasn't able to intelligently ingest alerts. It created 4,000 incident tickets in a month, which didn't reflect what was happening. If we received an alert, the synthetic monitoring and volume drop would give us the same alert. Evanios should include alert ingestion and de-duplication of alerts and noise reduction. We couldn't have people resolving each and every incident. PagerDuty gives us reports on how many alerts are being ingested, how many are noise, how many have bigger incidents, and which of the alerts are creating noise. It would be helpful if Evanios had metrics on the amount of alerts and types of the alerts to show which ones were serious incidents and which ones were just noise.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
The pricing of the product is reasonable if we compare it with other Gartner leading products like Splunk, LogRhythm, Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps. Its licensing model is basically on per-day ...
What needs improvement with Devo?
Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM ...
What is your primary use case for Devo?
I am using Devo myself. Basically, I work at an MSSP, and we provide services to the organization for Security Operation Centers. In our Security Operation Center, we provide the service of SIEM vi...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Evanios and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.