Drata vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security comparison

Drata and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Compliance Management category. Drata is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8, while SentinelOne is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Drata holds a 5.3% mindshare in CM, compared to SentinelOne’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Drata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 99% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Drata

Read 10 Drata reviews

2,109 Views
2,109 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Read 124 SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security reviews

19,456 Views
3,891 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Drata

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and Drata are both leading solutions, with SentinelOne focusing on security features and Drata specializing in compliance automation. SentinelOne has an advantage in security features with its comprehensive cloud security measures, while Drata's emphasis on compliance and audit readiness offers significant advantages for businesses heavily focused on audits and regulations.

Features: SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security provides advanced threat detection, endpoint protection, and AI-driven analytics. Drata delivers automated compliance monitoring, seamless integration with existing systems, and audit-readiness support.

Room for Improvement: SentinelOne could improve by enhancing its integration capabilities with other security tools, offering more streamlined compliance features, and reducing initial setup complexity. Drata might benefit from expanding its security measures, improving user interface customization, and integrating more automation features to accelerate resource scanning processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne offers a straightforward deployment model with options for extensive security configurations, focusing on technical support for complex security environments. Drata emphasizes a streamlined integration process, ease of use focusing on compliance objectives, and faster implementation, especially in compliance contexts.

Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne's flexible pricing structure reflects its extensive security features, providing strong ROI for security-conscious organizations. Drata offers competitive pricing for automated compliance solutions, delivering significant ROI for businesses prioritizing audit efficiency. Despite SentinelOne's higher initial costs, its robust security features justify the investment, while Drata's cost-effectiveness makes it suitable for compliance-focused enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Drata vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Drata

Ranking in Compliance Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Ranking in Compliance Management

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

124

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (4th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (3rd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (3rd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (3rd), AI Observability (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Compliance Management category, the mindshare of Drata is 5.3%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 8.3%, up from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Compliance Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security	8.3%
Drata	5.3%
Other	86.4%

Compliance Management

Featured Reviews

Jacqueline Segooa

Cybersecurity Governance Specialist at Suse

Centralized audits and policies have transformed how our team manages compliance workflows

At the moment, integrating Drata with other AIs would be beneficial. I am not too sure if it is something that can be done or if it is possible, but I am not aware. Integrating it with AI where maybe with regards to evidence collection, I would not have to be collecting the evidence manually would be helpful. When you are managing a lot of frameworks, it is a lot of work to actually individually and manually upload all the evidence in Drata. If maybe there is an AI which can be able to automate that kind of a workflow, and obviously as human beings, we will have to do a human error check, I think it would be amazing. I am not too sure if maybe at the moment it is something that is in place and I am not aware of, but I think it would be great.Integrations within my team are managed by someone, but I do have an idea about Drata's automated control monitoring. For example, with tests, there are certain systems such as AWS that has been integrated with Drata, and it tests those systems and puts them as part of evidence. For example, data encryption at rest. We can put it a test and integrate it with AWS, and then it will automatically test the encryption in data at rest. If the test has failed, you will see it. When I log in to check all the controls that have failed, it will show on Drata that the test has failed. Then I will be able to coordinate with the relevant stakeholders and tell them that it needs to be fixed. I would like Drata to make the user interface more intuitive.

Read full review

Sreeraj Mohandas

Security Engineer at HashXpert

Consolidated cloud security has reduced manual work and has automated vulnerability remediation

I elaborate on my rating of SentinelOne support by mentioning that there was some time where the troubleshooting took a longer time. In fact, there were many meetings going on. The availability of the document on the internet is on a lesser side because as an engineer, I would want to know about the troubleshooting aspects of this particular tool. When I am facing a customer, I do not prefer to bring the vendor to every call and try to resolve it, as it takes months and months. It would be better to have a training session with the engineer on site to explain and train properly. This is not the case with SentinelOne, so this is the only thing I have a complaint about. I do not have any other room for improvement to suggest within SentinelOne itself. However, I would really want the AI assistant for the threat hunting part to be more accessible. They have it, but they are making it licensed, so it is a bit on the higher end.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, Drata as a tool has brought a lot of improvements within the GRC team, and having to centralize everything in one system, mapping the controls within one system, performing audits within one system, monitoring policies within one system, and doing risk management within one system is something that in GRC, speaking from a GRC perspective in cybersecurity, has been very impactful and effective within the team."

"Drata helped us publish our ISO and SOC reports, which was essential for the acquisition. The challenge now is whether Drata can scale up to meet the needs of a larger company, which already has tools like Intune to enforce laptop encryption. Drata is excellent for startups and small—to medium-sized companies but may face challenges in larger organizations with multiple environments."

"My experience with customer support was good; they were responsive, but they didn't ever get us to a solution that worked."

"Drata keeps adding new features, allowing us to build our entire InfoSec program within it. Adding new components and evidence for different audits is easy. Drata also integrates with various software, like ticketing systems, source code control, and cloud platforms, continuously pulling evidence from these integrations. Without a GRC tool with these integrations, we used to gather evidence from different software during audits manually. Drata has a significant impact on our security posture management. Previously, Drata had features for security posture management, primarily through integration with AWS. For example, it would scan AWS for specific security requirements, like ensuring all S3 buckets are private. It will be reported on the Drata platform if it finds a public bucket. Recently, Drata introduced a new feature that uses an infrastructure-as-code approach. This feature detects issues and provides AI-generated suggestions for fixing them. If an organization uses infrastructure-as-code solutions like Terraform, Drata will suggest changes to the Terraform code to address the issues. You can then review and apply these changes to fix the problems. This is particularly useful when dealing with many topics, as it helps automate and speed up the process of implementing fixes. However, this AI-generated code feature is part of Drata’s upsell options. The basic version of Drata offers limited capabilities compared to the advanced features available with a paid upgrade. Even without this new feature, Drata's security posture management is valuable, as it scans cloud environments for deviations from defined security baselines. Many tools offer similar capabilities, but Drata’s new feature that translates issues into actionable fixes is a notable advancement. This benefits teams with the capability and resources to use this tool effectively."

"Drata offers APIs for every clause so that it can integrate into various platforms."

"Drata helps eliminate evidence gathering and makes assigning different activities to different team members easier, simplifying compliance and audit processes. In Pennsylvania, we're putting in thousands of hours. Drata improves our security posture by reducing extra work, allowing us to focus on other security directives. I like the control editing and task management features the most. It's easy to use, but it's also easy for people to think they don't need security experts if they have it."

"The way the tool's controls are linked to the framework, specifically with SAST and HIPAA frameworks or any other frameworks, is really good."

"The product is 100 percent friendly to use."

"They're responsive to feature requests. If I suggest a feature for Prisma, I will need to wait until the next release on their roadmap. Cloud Native Security will add it right away."

"Cloud Native Security's most valuable features include cloud misconfiguration detection and remediation, compliance monitoring, a robust authentication security engine, and cloud threat detection and response capabilities."

"With SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, it's easy to onboard new accounts."

"It is advantageous in terms of time-saving and cost reduction."

"SentinelOne's behaviour analytics are valuable because they detect anomalies and malicious behaviour that signature-based solutions might miss."

"The user-friendly dashboard offers both convenience and security by providing quick access to solutions and keeping us informed of potential threats."

"I can say it is one of the best user interfaces I have used, and it is very user-friendly."

"The best features in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security are that it is user friendly and its user interface is very easy to understand."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

Cons

"The solution is quite costly."

"There was one instance where our auditors could not access the Audit Hub in Drata, and it was not really something that was wrong from our company side."

"Drata has impacted our organization negatively, as it made the whole compliance process more complicated and cost me significant time."

"The thing with Drata is you cannot open multiple tabs on the same interface or the same desktop,"

"In terms of improvements, I'd suggest better marketing since the industry tends to market these tools as security experts, which isn't true."

"One of the challenges with Drata is that if you're paying for a subscription to ISO 27001, you must undergo a risk assessment. You should have access to all necessary modules on the platform to achieve your compliance posture and certification."

"The existing features of Drata are already extensive and costly to integrate."

"There is room for improvement in Drata. The core features are solid, but some new features are in a very MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. They work, but the user experience isn't always smooth. While the core features are well-developed compared to the market, the new features need more polish. They could benefit from more user feedback and iterations to make them more useful. Some of these new features look promising buthave flaws, so we can’t fully adopt them or justify paying extra for them now. The user interface is clean and intuitive. However, you'll need some specific knowledge if you're a security policy manager or need to set updifferent integrations."

More Drata cons

"The alerting system of the product is an area that I look at and sometimes get confused about. I feel the alerting feature needs improvement."

"If I had to pick a complaint, it would be the way the hosts are listed in the tool. You have different columns separated by endpoint name, Cloud Account, and Cloud Instances ID. I wish there was something where we could change the endpoint name and not use just the IP address. We would like to have custom names or our own names for the instances. If I had a complaint, that would be it, but so far, it meets all the needs that we have."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is on the costlier side."

"A few YouTube videos could be helpful. There isn't a lot of information out there to look at."

"To enhance the notification system's efficiency, resolved issues should be promptly removed from the portal."

"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."

"Sometimes the Storyline ID is a bit wacky."

"There can be a specific type of alert showing that a new type of risk has been identified."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I remember that my company used to pay 25,000 USD to use the product...The product's cost is really high, but it is a powerful tool."

"Drata's pricing is quite reasonable. Compared to other tools in the market, including its biggest competitor, Vanta, Drata is much cheaper. Even compared to other tools like AuditBoard, which aren’t as good, Drata’s price remains competitive."

"It's one of the more expensive options, but I think it's worth the money if you can afford it."

"SentinelOne offers excellent pricing and licensing options."

"PingSafe is fairly priced."

"PingSafe is affordable."

"PingSafe is not very expensive compared to Prisma Cloud, but it's also not that cheap. However, because of its features, it makes sense to us as a company. It's fairly priced."

"The pricing tends to be high."

"SentinelOne provided competitive pricing compared to other vendors, and we are satisfied with the deal."

"It's not cheap, but it is worth the price."

"I am not involved in the pricing, but it is cost-effective."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compliance Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	52
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Drata?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Drata?

I am an end user of Drata. Most of the time I work with Drata for control mapping, uploading evidence, and sometimes risk management and the Policy Center, such as uploading policies. Those are mai...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Drata?

From my experience with Drata, if maybe for someone who is entry-level or who is not really too technical, they would not really understand some of the things. For someone who is not really technic...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best features.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is that the pricing is good; it is not expensive, it is medium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

Integration could be improved because not all solutions can be integrated with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security or vice versa. I was in a project where the company wanted to integrate Sentine...

See all answers

Comparisons

Vanta vs Drata

Compared 20% of the time

anecdotes vs Drata

Compared 8% of the time

Sprinto vs Drata

Compared 8% of the time

Delve Automated Compliance Platform vs Drata

Compared 8% of the time

More Drata Competitors

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 4% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Drata

May 2026

Download Drata product report

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

April 2026

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

PingSafe

Overview

Drata is a powerful tool for automating compliance processes, effectively reducing audit preparation time and continuously monitoring security controls. It is highly valued for its ability to integrate seamlessly with existing tech stacks and manage security for remote teams, ensuring adherence to standards like SOC 2 and HIPAA. Drata enhances organizational efficiency, improves workflows, and supports real-time compliance monitoring, making compliance management less stressful and more accurate.

Drata

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.

Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.

What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?

Ease of Use: Intuitive operation simplifies navigation across platforms.
Real-Time Detection: Quick identification and response to threats.
Automated Remediation: Streamlines recovery processes with integration capabilities.
Forensic Visibility: Aids in thorough threat analysis and prevention strategies.
Comprehensive Console: Offers full visibility and historical data tracking.
Platform Integration: Supports seamless operation across cloud and hybrid environments.

What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation and third-party integration improve threat response.
Improved Detection: Reduces mean time to detect and respond to threats.
Operational Support: Comprehensive visibility and forensic tools aid operational decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Affordable integration with scaling capabilities without high overhead.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.

SentinelOne

Buyer's Guide

Drata vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

April 2026

Free Report: Drata vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Drata vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Drata vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report.

See our list of best Compliance Management vendors.

We monitor all Compliance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.