Druva Phoenix vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Druva and Quorum are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Druva is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while Quorum is ranked #43 with an average rating of 7.0. Druva holds a 1.2% mindshare in CB, compared to Quorum’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Druva users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Quorum users who would recommend it.

Druva Phoenix

Read 10 Druva Phoenix reviews

3,192 Views
2,011 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Quorum OnQ

Read 22 Quorum OnQ reviews

4,183 Views
1,966 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Druva Phoenix

Quorum OnQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 15, 2024

Druva Phoenix and Quorum OnQ are competing data protection solutions. Druva Phoenix holds an advantage with its enhanced data recovery features, while Quorum OnQ surpasses in application support and rapid recovery capabilities.

Features: Druva Phoenix offers scalable cloud backup, efficient data deduplication, and robust cloud integration. Conversely, Quorum OnQ delivers instant recovery, extensive application support, and local backup options with its appliance-based approach.

Room for Improvement: Druva Phoenix could enhance its ransomware protection and address concerns with limited AI and ML integration. Additionally, its cloud-only model might not suit all environments. Quorum OnQ may improve by reducing its upfront infrastructure requirement, refining the user interface, and expanding its remote site testing capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Druva Phoenix's cloud-native deployment simplifies setup and supports cloud adoption, while its centralized management reduces complexity. Quorum OnQ's appliance-based deployment involves more initial setup but is complemented by comprehensive customer service and support.

Pricing and ROI: Druva Phoenix's subscription pricing adapts to usage, offering cost optimization and ROI through infrastructural savings. In contrast, Quorum OnQ requires a higher initial investment but provides ROI via minimized downtime and robust business continuity, appealing to those seeking long-term operational resilience.

To learn more, read our detailed Druva Phoenix vs. Quorum OnQ Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Druva Phoenix vs. Quorum OnQ

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Druva Phoenix

Ranking in Cloud Backup

26th

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (8th), SaaS Backup (13th)

Quorum OnQ

Ranking in Cloud Backup

43rd

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

27th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (51st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Druva Phoenix is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quorum OnQ is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Druva Phoenix	1.2%
Quorum OnQ	1.0%
Other	97.8%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

ZubeenAhmad

Tam Adobe at Murdoch Webster

Cloud backup has reduced storage costs and now delivers fast, reliable data recovery

My overall experience in this field is seven years. The deployment model I have chosen for Druva Phoenix is mostly cloud-based backup. Government authorities and government customers majorly opt for on-premises deployment, but we have a very limited customer segment from that area. Druva Phoenix primarily operates on a private cloud, with some customers utilizing hybrid cloud solutions. If I assess the effectiveness of backup features in Druva Phoenix, particularly in minimizing operational disruptions, I would rate it as a very strong 9 or 9.5 on a scale of 10. I am not using Druva Data Security Cloud. My overall review rating for Druva Phoenix is 9.

Read full review

reviewer2594778

Senior Application Analyst at a non-profit with 5,001-10,000 employees

Enhanced filtering for advocate emails

Quorum provides an elevated ability to filter on everything from people's location to age to their voting history. This is an extreme feature that will help our advocacy department a lot. It encompasses the ability to formulate emails and calls to action across regions. Their platform is more advanced than our previous one. It provides a smooth training experience and easy terminology for those in the advocacy world.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Druva Phoenix provides a return on investment and operational cost reductions after implementation."

"Druva Phoenix is easy to use and easy to start with."

"The best features of Druva Phoenix include comprehensive backup capabilities where you can back up your data with agent plus backup, deploy the proxy, and integrate your VMs to take your backup."

"I found the cost-effectiveness of Druva Phoenix to be its most valuable feature, especially when compared to on-premises backup solutions."

"We chose the best one that works for us which was Druva Phoenix."

"One of the best features in Druva Phoenix for me personally is that it is an air-gapped environment, where you can keep cloud backup on a separate air-gapped environment and save from any kind of ransomware attack, and it is a ransomware safer environment because a customer gets a separate environment."

"The solution is great for companies that need backup capabilities."

"The most valuable features of Druva Phoenix are the simple portal to log in and flexibility."

More Druva Phoenix pros

"The biggest feature is being able to do a file recovery to the original server. That is extremely useful and has saved us a few times when we've had ransomware. In some of those cases, people's computers were locked down by viruses which spread to things they had access to, including server shares. But we were easily able to just restore to four hours prior, instead of a day or two or more ago."

"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."

"Having the ability to reduce recovery time, for critical resources, from multiple hours to a matter of minutes, is huge."

"The change in the way that Quorum processes data has made a tremendous improvement in backup and replication times. While the familiar interface remains, the underpinnings have been finely tuned and the speed is incredible. My large Exchange Server went from 5- to 6-hour backups down to 22 minutes."

"The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery."

"It does automated tests to the systems to make sure that you could spin them up if you needed to. And if something doesn't come back up in those tests, we get a notification saying the system didn't come back up."

"When it comes to recovering what you need from a backup, it's really easy. You just drill through the directory, find the file and the date that you want, and click to recover. You then pick the directory you want to save it in. Usually, it takes a minute or two and it's done. It's quick and easy."

"This is the best money I spend on my budget."

More Quorum OnQ pros

Cons

"They were able to give us a very reasonable price considering we were non-for-profit organizations, however, there is always room for improvement on that cost."

"Druva Phoenix is optimized to work with x86 platforms, making it unsuitable for backing up non-x86 architectures like AIX. The solution is primarily designed for physical Linux and Windows systems based on the x86 architecture, as well as virtualized Windows and Linux environments. However, if you have an AIX system, it cannot be deployed in the cloud, and therefore, backing it up in the cloud is not a concern."

"The product's pricing needs to be improved."

"There is room for improvement in the reporting aspect of Druva Phoenix."

"Druva Phoenix should include a few reporting features that it doesn't provide currently."

"The price is always one of those things that you always look to just improve if you're a not-for-profit organization."

"Although, sometimes there is a restriction with the number of OS platforms that this solution supports."

"The ransomware features are limited in Druva. There's a lot of improvement needed. It should extend to Nutanix and Hyper-V. It should extend to Azure as well."

More Druva Phoenix cons

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"It feels to me like it's going to be a little bit more work than I originally anticipated when upgrading the appliance. I haven't done that yet so I can't speak from true experience, but I went through the project plan and it feels to me like there's quite a number of pieces and components and things that have to be done. Quorum is going to manage the rollout, but in starting the initial conversation there were a lot of unanswered questions"

"The price of Quorum OnQ could be improved. We were exploring the product in terms of having a partnership with the distributor so that we could operate as a service, but for our own use, within the company, we couldn't justify the price unless the servers would become an option later on. The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."

"The cost could be reduced."

"Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed."

"They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments with different needs."

"It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular."

"One of the complaints from our customers is that the Quorum is expensive, and they question why it is on par with these other products."

More Quorum OnQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's very costly. Normal people wouldn't understand how their credits are calculated. It's pretty complex."

"I assume clients use Druva Phoenix because it is cheaper than other products."

"Druva Phoenix's pricing is based on the service provided, and it's reasonable. The cost of the service will depend on the size of your data and the number of virtual machines being backed up. However, the pricing structure is straightforward and easy to understand."

"We’ve had experience with the data center for a while and we have had solutions that were able to support older versions of the operating systems that we needed. I would like for Druva to support it as well."

"We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."

"When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."

"The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."

"The solution’s pricing is economical."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

"The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."

"The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."

"When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."

More Quorum OnQ pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Druva Phoenix?

While Druva Phoenix is a good solution for a cloud-to-cloud environment, such as moving from AWS to another AWS, I see complexity when a customer wants to move from a physical environment or a phys...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Druva Phoenix?

Druva Phoenix is for server backups on cloud, which is the deployment model chosen by my customers. While Druva Phoenix is a good solution for a cloud-to-cloud environment, such as moving from AWS ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Druva Phoenix?

Many customers use Druva Phoenix's continuous data protection feature, but not for Phoenix. Not for Phoenix because Phoenix is server backups, and you generally do not keep continuous backup for se...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quorum OnQ?

It's a little expensive. That said, the cost aligns with other advocacy tools we have evaluated.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quorum OnQ?

They have radio buttons that allow multiselection, which is not intuitive. Also, the URL for our environments is the same, making it confusing for management when handling different departments wit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quorum OnQ?

We launched all of our advocacy departments through Quorum next month. We are in the process of uploading all of our data and creating custom fields.

See all answers

Comparisons

Druva inSync vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 7% of the time

N2W vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 4% of the time

Barracuda Email Gateway Defense (Barracuda Essentials) vs Druva Phoenix

Compared 4% of the time

More Druva Phoenix Competitors

Commvault Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 6% of the time

HYCU R-Cloud vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Quorum OnQ

Compared 3% of the time

More Quorum OnQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Druva Phoenix

June 2026

Download Druva Phoenix product report

Buyer's Guide

Quorum OnQ

June 2026

Download Quorum OnQ product report

Also Known As

CloudRanger

OnQ

Overview

Druva Phoenix offers an easy-to-use, secure, and cost-effective cloud backup solution with simplified management and efficient data protection capabilities.

Druva Phoenix is designed for environments needing straightforward setup and automated off-site backups without on-premises requirements. It provides global deduplication, optimizing storage and costs while offering robust ransomware protection through air-gapped environments. Users value its easy integration with cloud providers like AWS, flexible retention options, and strong disaster recovery capabilities. However, it requires enhancements in reporting, support for diverse OS platforms, and more flexibility in backup locations. Concerns include its deployment in hybrid models and pricing for not-for-profits. Technical support responsiveness also needs improvement.

What are Druva Phoenix's key features?

Ease of Use: Quick setup with automated backups off-site.
Global Deduplication: Charges only for reduced data, optimizing costs.
Ransomware Protection: Air-gapped environments enhance security.
Cloud Integration: Seamless backup with AWS and cloud platforms.
Disaster Recovery: Strong capabilities within AWS infrastructure.

What benefits do users experience with Druva Phoenix?

Cost-Effectiveness: Reduced data charges decrease expenses.
Security: Enhanced ransomware protection and data security.
Efficiency: Simplified management without on-premises hardware.
Scalability: Facilitates data protection via cloud backup solutions.

Druva Phoenix is widely used for backing up virtual environments, physical servers, and SQL workloads. It supports Hyper-V, VMware, Nutanix, and Azure backups, particularly aiding clients in the pharmaceutical industry. By modernizing data backup, it eliminates hardware, secures data off-site, and integrates smoothly with AWS, addressing needs for local and AWS cloud backup. Despite some challenges in deployment from physical environments to cloud infrastructure, its use is prevalent among enterprises prioritizing data protection and management efficiency.

Druva

Quorum OnQ offers disaster recovery and high availability with fast recovery, ensuring continuity by quickly spinning up virtual machines. It supports secure data management with 256-bit AES encryption and provides streamlined backup processes, enhancing data safety against threats like ransomware.

Quorum OnQ is designed for users needing efficient server restoration and data management. It allows seamless server recovery, automated testing, and versioning capabilities. Users benefit from a user-friendly interface and the ability to test virtual environments without operational disruption. Quorum OnQ enhances data safety through secure encryption and efficient backup processes. While it streamlines server monitoring with a "Single Pane of Glass" feature, improvement is needed in its scheduler design, enhanced disaster recovery testing, and OS support. The upgrade process can be lengthy, and better integration with cloud services like Azure is desirable. Quorum OnQ's pricing and support response times should be improved, and additional backup options for NAS and tape security are needed.

What are the key features of Quorum OnQ?

Quick Recovery: Ensures minimal downtime with fast server restoration.
One-Click Restoration: Simplifies server recovery to enhance efficiency.
Automated Testing: Validates backup systems through automated processes.
Secure Data Management: Utilizes 256-bit AES encryption for data protection.
Virtual Machine Spin-up: Allows non-disruptive testing of environments.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and system management.
Seamless Server Monitoring: "Single Pane of Glass" provides centralized management.

How does Quorum OnQ Impact ROI?

Fast Recovery of Business Processes: Minimizes downtime and restores operations quickly.
Enhanced Data Security: Protects essential data from threats like ransomware.
Efficient Integration: Supports seamless interactions with existing systems.
Operational Efficiency: Suits disaster-prone regions through reliable performance.

Quorum OnQ is used in industries where disaster recovery and data availability are critical, such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. It supports both on-premise and cloud deployments, making it versatile for backing up production and operational servers, including file, email, and financial servers, ensuring minimal business disruption.

Quorum

Sample Customers

TRC Companies, Family Health Network, GulfMark Offshore, Pall Corporation

LCL Bulk Transport

Buyer's Guide

Druva Phoenix vs. Quorum OnQ

June 2026

Free Report: Druva Phoenix vs. Quorum OnQ

Find out what your peers are saying about Druva Phoenix vs. Quorum OnQ and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Druva Phoenix vs. Quorum OnQ report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors, best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors, and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.