DX NetOps vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Broadcom and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0, while Zenoss is ranked #69. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

2,904 Views
2,526 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

5,134 Views
2,464 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and DX NetOps compete in the network monitoring and management category. Zenoss Cloud is favored for its user-friendly experience, while DX NetOps is preferred for comprehensive monitoring capabilities in larger enterprises.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers real-time performance monitoring, predictive analytics, and robust integrations. DX NetOps provides network visibility, extensive reporting capabilities, and scalability for expansive networks.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could improve its alerting system, enhance dashboard customization, and further develop specific features. DX NetOps users recommend better interoperability with third-party tools, a more intuitive settings menu, and enhancing adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. DX NetOps requires a more complex setup but compensates with comprehensive customer support to streamline complex integrations.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud is perceived as cost-effective with lower initial setup costs and quicker ROI. DX NetOps, though higher in cost, justifies its price with an extensive feature set and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

38th

Ranking in AIOps

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

69th

Ranking in AIOps

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (18th), Event Monitoring (13th), Server Monitoring (25th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (55th), Container Monitoring (8th), Cloud Monitoring Software (42nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Zenoss Cloud	0.8%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"Real-time insights through DX NetOps benefit diagnosing and resolving network issues since Spectrum has all sorts of details, but it lacks dashboards and a readable tabular format."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"The solution is stable."

More DX NetOps pros

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

"Zenoss is more complex than LogicMonitor, but scalable and hugely customizable."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"It is the most flexible solution of this type, but it takes time to adapt."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

More DX NetOps cons

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"This solution is complex for beginners so it takes some time to learn."

"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 10% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

ScienceLogic vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

June 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

May 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

DX NetOps offers robust network monitoring capabilities along with AI-driven automation and predictive analytics, making it a valuable tool for ensuring network performance and reliability across hybrid environments.

DX NetOps is designed to provide comprehensive visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on root cause analysis, ease of setup, scalability, and stability. Its features allow for proactive issue identification through custom dashboards, while integration with IT systems ensures seamless connectivity. Performance management and insightful analytics enhance network visibility, aiding resource allocation in hybrid environments. Organizations utilize DX NetOps for monitoring, alerting, and analytics across network devices, benefiting from integration with platforms like ServiceNow.

What are the key features of DX NetOps?

Root Cause Analysis: Identifies network issues efficiently to minimize downtime.
Scalability: Supports expansive networks without compromising performance.
AI-Driven Automation: Streamlines network management tasks using artificial intelligence.
Predictive Analytics: Anticipates potential network problems, enabling proactive measures.
Topological Views: Provides visual insights into network structure and connectivity.
Custom Dashboards: Allows users to tailor views for specific monitoring and analysis needs.

What benefits or ROI should users anticipate?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Improved insights lead to better network performance management.
Proactive Issue Identification: Early detection of issues reduces downtime and service interruptions.
Improved Resource Allocation: Optimizes network resources across hybrid environments.
Seamless IT Integration: Ensures efficient workflows with other systems for better performance tracking.
Infrastructure Planning Support: Assists in preparing for peak periods with detailed analytics.

DX NetOps is widely implemented across telecommunications, financial services, and manufacturing industries. Organizations leverage its capabilities for monitoring extensive network infrastructures, ensuring optimal performance through integration with existing platforms and enhancing decision-making processes with detailed network analytics.

Broadcom

Zenoss Cloud provides a comprehensive overview of IT environments, supporting cross-cloud functionality, scalability, and robust integrations. It offers dynamic monitoring through its intuitive dashboard and supports hybrid deployments across cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud enables users to monitor network infrastructure and operator platforms efficiently. With features like agentless monitoring and real-time alerts, Zenoss Cloud integrates seamlessly with external systems such as ITSM tools. Its flexible functionality allows for the management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from easy setup and strong technical support, although they seek enhancements in AI capabilities and simpler installation. The pricing model and complexity for beginners and storage monitoring are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of Zenoss Cloud?

Dynamic Monitoring: Enhances user experience with real-time insights.
Cross-Cloud Functionality: Supports hybrid deployments across AWS and Azure.
Agentless Monitoring: Simplifies deployment with minimal overhead.
Scalability: Grows with your network's demands.
Custom Integration: Supports notifications and alerts tailored to user requirements.

What benefits should users expect from Zenoss Cloud?

Time Efficiency: Quick setup and operation save resources.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation streamlines troubleshooting.
Cost-effective Monitoring: Prevents multiple charges in server monitoring.
Enhanced User Experience: Offers seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud is widely used in monitoring solutions for industries including technology and data centers. It supports direct monitoring of systems like vSphere and NetApp, making it ideal for IT operations and managed services. Integration with tools such as ServiceNow and SolarWinds aligns it with diverse IT environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud

May 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best AIOps vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.