Eggplant Test vs FortiMonitor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Keysight Technologies and Fortinet are both solutions in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.0, while Fortinet is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 1.7% mindshare in DEM, compared to Fortinet’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

6,495 Views
455 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

FortiMonitor

Read 15 FortiMonitor reviews

5,646 Views
790 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

FortiMonitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Eggplant Test and FortiMonitor compete in the software testing and monitoring landscape. Eggplant Test has the upper hand in automation and comprehensive testing, while FortiMonitor leads with its exceptional monitoring features.

Features: Eggplant Test provides scriptless testing and intelligent automation, making it suitable for teams with varied testing requirements. It also offers powerful optical character recognition and comprehensive cross-platform testing. FortiMonitor excels in real-time performance tracking, sophisticated alerting systems, and centralized management, suitable for users who prioritize infrastructure monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Eggplant Test could enhance ease of deployment and offer more intuitive configuration options to simplify advanced scenarios. It may also benefit from improved documentation. FortiMonitor can expand its initial vendor support, enhance automation integration, and provide more extensive training resources for users unfamiliar with monitoring tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FortiMonitor offers straightforward deployment, facilitating quick setup and integration. It emphasizes comprehensive documentation and support frameworks. Eggplant Test faces challenges with more intricate configurations but offers support services to assist users in overcoming these hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: Eggplant Test's pricing reflects its extensive testing capabilities, with strong ROI for teams needing automated solutions. FortiMonitor presents competitive pricing, delivering ROI through real-time monitoring and enhanced oversight. Eggplant Test requires higher initial investment, while FortiMonitor offers quick returns through operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (12th), Test Automation Tools (11th)

FortiMonitor

Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (31st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (43rd), IT Alerting and Incident Management (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 1.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of FortiMonitor is 3.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
FortiMonitor	3.2%
Eggplant Test	1.7%
Other	95.1%

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

reviewer2677554

Network Engineer III at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Managing diverse networks with detailed alerts enhances device oversight

FortiManager is very helpful in managing our networks. We use it to manage 20 farms and various networks with hundreds of devices. The version we are using provides more detail than the older dashboard. We appreciate the alerting capabilities, which are integrated with SolarWinds to notify our team via SMS.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to set up."

"We took a two and a half week regression process and cut it down to almost two days of automation, which is pretty awesome and makes Eggplant probably one of the best tools on the market for GUI automation."

"DAI's newest release allows us to test via scripts rather than models, because we have done 95 percent of our development in functional, not through modeling. I am really happy that then we can use the controller to run scripts rather than having to translate things to models. There are lots of options."

"Good text reading ability."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

More Eggplant Test pros

"FortiMonitor is really easy to use for monitoring the logs on FortiGate...It is a stable product."

"FortiMonitor offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, allowing me to track network traffic in and out effectively."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"In FortiMonitor, we're linked up with our Netgear, CactusServer, and NOC. It's really valuable because everything's migrating to one dashboard for us system engineers. We can keep an eye on traffic, blocked sites, and the health of our hardware. That last part, about knowing if something's going to fail soon, is super important. It gives us time to sort things out before any big problems happen. As a system engineer, I need to keep tabs on everything – temperature, monitoring systems, and network operations. This data is really handy because it helps me ensure our site runs smoothly, whether it's turning systems on or off. Just last night, there was a system failure, but thanks to real-time monitoring, I quickly identified the problem and got the necessary replacement parts."

"The most valuable feature of FortiMonitor is user monitoring, as we are able to see if the user is following the policy or not from their system, and additionally the solution integrates well with Fortinet FortiGate and has centralized management."

"FortiMonitor's dashboard is very informative and user-friendly."

"Overall, I would recommend FortiMonitor to others."

"FortiMonitor has a very intuitive dashboard, which makes it particularly helpful for analyzing traffic, alerts, and other information."

More FortiMonitor pros

Cons

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"We found that we had issues regarding the VPN setup, which is one of the reasons that we did not purchase this solution."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"There was no free trial in it."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"We were not able to write code as fast as with the competing open-source software, so that needs to be improved."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

More Eggplant Test cons

"I think the current features are really good for me, nothing else comes to mind right now. Maybe some small improvements could be made in the customization and configuration part of the UI to make it easier or more intuitive. Customizable UI options, like we saw in the demo, could be helpful for everyone. But in our operational environment, having clear health status and system details is crucial for us system engineers. One feature I'd really like to see is a credential management system. It would help us keep track of who's logged in and how many times, which is important due to user restrictions. Sometimes, we need to manage logins more efficiently, like logging off other users to free up credentials. So having a feature like that would be really helpful."

"The tool's price in Vietnam is high, making it an area of concern where improvements can be made."

"The solution's initial setup process is time-consuming."

"FortiMonitor could be improved by making it more convenient for smaller workloads, such as when configuring a few branches."

"For our type of country, it is always expensive, but it has competitive pricing."

"Sometimes, during high CPU usage, we cannot access FortiMonitor and must refresh it."

"FortiMonitor needs to improve its alert system."

"There are areas for improvement that FortiManager is addressing."

More FortiMonitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"In terms of licensing, while it may not be the most expensive option on the market, it's relatively cost-effective. You can obtain licenses at a lower cost, with the calculation being straightforward. For example, if you onboard around 5,000 devices, you'll need approximately 5,000 licenses, as each device typically counts as one license."

"There are additional costs needed for certain functionality, such as scalability."

"Compared to other solutions, FortiMonitor is a very expensive solution."

"On a scale from one to ten, I rate the pricing a nine since it is a good solution that is available at a cheap price."

"The price of FortiMonitor is approximately $200 annually for 225 users. The price is competitive."

"FortiMonitor's price is very high."

"The tool's pricing model in Vietnam is a bit high. I rate the product price as an eight out of ten."

"We have a large customer base for Fortinet, and the additional buying power got us really great discounts."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

I have a clear bias because I work for Panopta. We aren't a fit for everyone, but I can confirm that Panopta is a lot less work to stand up and maintain. It's also a lot easier to use and onboard n...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiMonitor?

FortiMonitor does save time but not significantly on costs, as there are still expenses related to procurement, installation, and licensing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiMonitor?

There are areas for improvement that FortiManager is addressing. We have not yet upgraded to the latest software versions, being a full revision behind, but we plan to update soon since the current...

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

PRTG Network Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs FortiMonitor

Compared 5% of the time

ThousandEyes vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs FortiMonitor

Compared 4% of the time

More FortiMonitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

October 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

October 2026

Download FortiMonitor product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Panopta

Overview

Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.

Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.

What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?

OCR and Image Recognition: Facilitates efficient bug detection and automated testing.
AI Capabilities: Enhances testing efficiency with intelligent automation.
Cross-Platform Operation: Compatible with various operating systems.
Integration Options: Connects easily with GitHub and other platforms.
Scriptless Testing: Simplifies testing for users with limited coding skills.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Testing Time: Achieves faster testing cycles through automation.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances reliability with refined testing methods.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and operation for users.
Robust Reporting: Offers comprehensive insights into test outcomes.

Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.

Keysight Technologies

FortiMonitor excels in user monitoring and network operations, with its central management and intuitive dashboard. Known for reducing administrative costs and enhancing security awareness, it also provides seamless integration with other devices.

FortiMonitor supports dual-factor authentication, alert systems, and system health monitoring, proving essential for technical teams managing infrastructures and FortiGate activities. Despite its benefits, there are areas like compatibility and pricing where improvements are sought. It offers high-level monitoring, customizable dashboards, and alert capabilities which are critical in busy environments, especially for detecting harmful activities and ensuring efficient CPU utilization.

What features enhance FortiMonitor's efficiency?

User Monitoring: Monitors end users and logs effectively.
Traffic Analysis: Offers comprehensive insights into network traffic.
Dual-factor Authentication: Enhances security with two-step verification.
Centralized Management: Streamlines operations with an intuitive dashboard.
Proactive Alerts: Provides redundancy and instant notifications for potential issues.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with other devices for continuity.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Cost Reduction: Lowers administrative costs significantly.
Security Awareness: Improves security management efficiency.
Data Continuity: Ensures continuous operations with automated vendor configuration.
Efficiency Gains: Adapts to new vendors and enhances CPU utilization.

FortiMonitor is widely implemented in industries for end-user monitoring, security tracking, and infrastructure management. It's crucial for environments needing high-level monitoring and identifying hardware problems, where proactive management and customizable dashboards are key to maintaining operations.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

SONY, GoDaddy, HCL, ING, ARMOR, billboard

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor

September 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. FortiMonitor report.

See our list of best Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) vendors.

We monitor all Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.