Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Eggplant Test vs Katalon Studio comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.7
Eggplant Test automation cut testing time and costs, saving $75,000 per tester and achieving fast ROI with increased efficiency.
Sentiment score
6.1
Katalon Studio is easy to learn, reduces testing time and costs, but effectiveness varies with application and usage.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Eggplant Test customer service is praised for quick, knowledgeable support, despite some time zone and coverage challenges.
Sentiment score
5.9
Katalon Studio's customer service is quick, with better support for licensed users; free users often rely on community forums.
Eggplant Test offers 24x7 support.
I'm not impressed because it depends on the resolution of the screen, so I wouldn't highly recommend this tool.
Katalon's support is not very strong unless you opt for the enterprise version.
I encountered a couple of issues during the initial setup, but customer care resolved them quickly.
Within 24 hours, I received support from the customer support team through their forum.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.5
Eggplant Test scales well and integrates strongly but faces challenges with licensing costs and performance slowdowns in large packs.
Sentiment score
6.9
Katalon Studio offers scalable Selenium script execution with budget-friendly options but requires improvements in speed and load testing adaptability.
It allows me to develop, run, and deploy test cases extensively.
Katalon Studio handles larger projects and more complex test cases very easily.
Katalon Studio has very good scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
Eggplant Test is praised for stability and responsive support but faces occasional crashes, latency, and high resource usage.
Sentiment score
6.7
Katalon Studio's stability is generally reliable, scoring six to nine out of ten, despite occasional lags and crashes.
It needs more stability when test cases are executed.
In my experience, Katalon Studio is stable, but sometimes I encounter lag and crash issues.
I have not encountered any major bugs or crashes.
 

Room For Improvement

Eggplant Test struggles with usability, integration, setup issues, and outdated features, requiring improvements in performance, support, and accessibility.
Katalon Studio requires better language support, tool integration, stability, documentation, reporting, pricing, and enhanced app testing capabilities.
For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective.
The two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture.
Parallel execution is available, but not with the free version.
Providing clearer guidance during the trial period for certification and training modules would also help.
There is significant competition, so providing a good offer with extra features could be beneficial.
 

Setup Cost

Eggplant Test is costly yet ideal for large enterprises, with execution-only licenses offering better cost-effectiveness than competitors.
Katalon Studio offers free and paid versions, with mixed opinions on pricing and value impacting enterprise buying decisions.
The approximate cost is around $8,000.
Although there are free automation software options available, Katalon Studio offers everything in a single hub for a fee.
The pricing of Katalon Studio is affordable, making it a sensible option for those looking for an affordable range.
 

Valuable Features

Eggplant Test excels in cross-platform testing with AI-driven automation, simplifying processes and enhancing collaboration through modular scripts.
Katalon Studio is favored for its ease, flexibility, robust automation features, seamless integration, affordability, and user-focused adaptability.
It can auto-heal the test cases and suggest new paths for testing, enhancing our ability to automate end-to-end journeys across various applications.
It can integrate with GitHub, allowing you to work with DevOps pipelines, so whenever you make changes in GitHub, it runs and checks the smoke testing on the server.
We can schedule our test cases, and the report which we get can be shared with higher-level management.
Katalon Studio has positively impacted my organization because I have noticed that I can save more than 50% of our time automating test cases.
Now, using Katalon Studio, we have a 50% increase in velocity in the test and create automatic tests.
 

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th)
Katalon Studio
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 4.0%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Katalon Studio is 8.7%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Katalon Studio8.7%
Eggplant Test4.0%
Other87.3%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain - PeerSpot reviewer
Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort
I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.
Keerthi Prasannakumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Has improved test efficiency and automated repeated sanity checks using reusable components
The best features Katalon Studio offers include its user-friendly nature. It is very much a user-friendly automation framework that supports both beginners and advanced users. It combines manual and script-based testing, allowing easy recording of steps and customization using Java or Groovy. Its built-in reporting, data-driven testing, and CI/CD integration are extremely useful for managing end-to-end automation efficiently. The best feature of Katalon Studio is its ease of setup with both manual and scripted automation, plus strong integration techniques, which help the tester find reports easily. It is more focused on debugging, reusability, and reporting. The reporting and debugging features of Katalon Studio help me in my testing workflow by providing test execution reports with logs, screenshots, and videos for failed steps, which makes it easier to analyze results. The report can be in formats such as HTML, PDF, or integrated into Katalon TestOps for tracking trends over time. For debugging, I use the debug mode to run test cases step-by-step, check every value, and inspect the console and log viewer for error messages. Katalon Studio highlights the exact failed step, provides stack traces, and helps quickly identify issues in locator data or synchronization. For example, in one of my projects, I automated a video upload and a preview feature in a web application. During execution, the test failed at the preview validation step. The Katalon Studio report showed that the preview element was not visible within expected time. I switched to debug mode, added a wait condition, and re-ran the test step-by-step to verify that the video preview loaded correctly before validation. After updating the script with an explicit wait, the test passed consistently, confirming all steps were successful and improving the reliability of future regression runs. Katalon Studio's report and debug mode help identify whether it's a timing issue or if we need an explicit wait. A key feature I notice in Katalon Studio is its cross-platform automation, supporting web, mobile, API, and desktop testing in one tool. The record and playback feature is my favorite because I'm not from a coding background. It allows for quick test creation without coding, making it accessible even for beginners. The repository and data-driven testing provide centralized storage for test elements, improving reusability. We can run the same test with multiple sets of data, which is also significant. The integration part is excellent, along with reusable test suites and keywords, which allow modular and maintainable test structures across projects. Katalon Studio has positively impacted my organization by significantly speeding up the testing process. The repetitive regression tests that used to take hours or days are now completed in a day or just two to three hours. The built-in reports and debugging features improved communication with developers and made issue resolution faster. With Katalon Studio providing detailed reports, false arguments have gradually reduced. Overall, test coverage, accuracy, and team productivity have enhanced, allowing for a more confident delivery of builds and shorter turnaround times. I think the company has a positive impact overall.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?
The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.
What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?
I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. Whe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Katalon Studio?
Katalon Studio is on the expensive side. I rated it eight on a scale where ten is very expensive. I recommend optimizing the pricing, as a moderate value around five would be preferred.
What needs improvement with Katalon Studio?
The pricing could be improved. Offering a discount on Katalon Studio licenses could encourage more users. There is significant competition, so providing a good offer with extra features could be be...
 

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers
Coca-Cola Tesla Black Board TaTa Consultancy Services Sony
Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Katalon Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.