Elastic Observability vs ManageEngine Applications Manager comparison

Elastic and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Elastic is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.3. Elastic holds a 1.9% mindshare in APM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

10,155 Views
7,210 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Applications M...

Read 18 ManageEngine Applications Manager reviews

3,129 Views
2,315 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

ManageEngine Applications M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ManageEngine Applications Manager and Elastic Observability are two leading tools in the IT management and monitoring space. Users are generally happier with the pricing and support provided by ManageEngine Applications Manager. Despite this, Elastic Observability seems to be a superior product due to its advanced features, which users feel are worth the additional cost.

Features: ManageEngine Applications Manager offers proactive monitoring capabilities, comprehensive application performance management, and ease of setup. Elastic Observability is highly valued for its robust logging, metrics, and traces capabilities, and the ability to integrate various data sources seamlessly.

Room for Improvement: Users of ManageEngine Applications Manager often cite the need for better scalability, enhanced reporting features, and more advanced analytics capabilities. Elastic Observability users suggest improvements in ease of use, better support for non-technical users, and a more user-friendly environment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Applications Manager is praised for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Elastic Observability, while also straightforward to deploy, is noted for its slightly learning curve and premium customer support. ManageEngine offers ease of setup and quick responses to issues, while Elastic provides comprehensive documentation to assist users in self-serving their setup needs.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Applications Manager is recognized for its cost-effective pricing and substantial ROI, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious organizations. Elastic Observability is perceived as more expensive but justifiable due to its expansive feature set. Users find the return on investment for Elastic to be high, despite the initial higher setup costs compared to ManageEngine.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (15th), Log Management (15th), Container Monitoring (5th)

ManageEngine Applications M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

40th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 1.9%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Applications Manager is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Elastic Observability	1.9%
ManageEngine Applications Manager	0.9%
Other	97.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

Srinivasan Naidu

Senior System Engineer at Qatar Petroleum

Managing application health has become simpler but new monitoring features still need faster delivery

I use application discovery and dependency mapping. It helps with managing application health What I like about ManageEngine Applications Manager is the ease of use and ease of deployment. I cannot remember anything specific for future updates of the product. The new features take a lot of time…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The architecture and system's stability are simple."

"The Elastic User Interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. You need to have some Javascript knowledge. We need that knowledge to develop new custom tests."

"I recommend Elastic Observability for its completeness of vision and wide ecosystem."

"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."

"I think Elastic Observability is already in very good shape."

"In addition to the fact that we are more proactive in the detection of incident before they occur, we can on one click see the request path from the customer to the backend."

"It has always been a stable solution."

"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of this solution."

More Elastic Observability pros

"For a small organization, I think ManageEngine is pretty nice, I think it's enough."

"What I like most about ManageEngine Applications Manager is its price point, apart from its technicalities. The solution is cheaper than its competitors. ManageEngine Applications Manager has helpful documentation that makes setting it up straightforward."

"The features on the dashboard of ManageEngine Application Manager are much better than these other solutions, and I found that those solutions can be quite costly in comparison."

"The most valuable features are: Takes care of all IT monitoring in one console: Server, apps and business services."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager's installation is pretty easy."

"The initial setup was straightforward, without complexity."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"The Service Level Management (SLM) rules engine stands out due to its flexibility and customization capabilities, making it an invaluable tool for tailoring processes to our specific needs."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pros

Cons

"When opening tickets, we cannot use our team mailbox."

"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."

"Elastic Observability is an excellent product for monitoring and visibility, but it lacks predictive analytics."

"The solution needs to use more AI. Once the product onboards AI, users would more effectively be able to track endpoints for specific messages."

"The auto-discovery isn't nearly as good. When you drop the agent onto the JVM and you're trying to figure things out, having to go through and manually do all that is cumbersome."

"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."

"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."

"It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side."

More Elastic Observability cons

"I assess the impact of real-user monitoring of this product on my application's performance as not good. I am not satisfied with monitoring."

"The problem is that implementation requires a significant amount of mapping effort."

"The agent often crashes when there is too much load on the application side. If a sudden storm of data comes in, the agent crashes down most of the time."

"They can improve the post-processing of the data. AppDynamics has more powerful tools for post-processing or analytics. It has some limitations in more complex environments, but because we are free to use different solutions, we try to find what is best for the customers or the problem we are trying to solve."

"The dashboards in the interface need a lot of work."

"An area for improvement in ManageEngine Applications Manager is artificial intelligence. If AI is integrated into the solution, it'll be a piece of cake. Currently, it's all configured manually."

"The information provided by ManageEngine is not deep-dive like IBM and CA provide."

"They can improve the post-processing of the data."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price."

"The licensing costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager are around $1,200 per year. For additional monitors, you have to pay extra."

"Its price is good."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"Price-wise, it is a cheap tool...The solution's licensing model is subscription-based, in which yearly payments are to be made."

"The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users."

"ManageEngine Applications Manager has reasonable pricing. It's more affordable than other solutions in the market. My company has an instance-based license for ManageEngine Applications Manager. You can purchase a yearly subscription or a perpetual license. The standard license covers most features, but you can still have some paid add-ons."

"The annual licensing depends on the number of monitors you have connected. Once you get to two hundred monitors you can see the price reflect."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Elastic Observability?

My use case for Elastic Observability is observability, as we upload our customers' data, including logs, and when there is an issue, we can analyze what went wrong.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

I am satisfied with the licensing cost for ManageEngine Applications Manager.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Applications Manager?

The new features take a lot of time to be implemented, and that could be improved about ManageEngine Applications Manager. If I were requesting a new feature that is not existing, making it availab...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

I use application discovery and dependency mapping. It helps with managing application health.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Elastic Observability

Compared 4% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 3% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Azure Monitor vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 6% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

May 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Applications Manager

April 2026

ManageEngine Applications Manager report

Download ManageEngine Applications Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Applications Manager

Overview

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

ManageEngine Applications Manager offers an intuitive dashboard that combines flexibility and affordability for comprehensive IT monitoring. Supporting over 80 applications and servers, it provides agentless monitoring and seamless integration with other management tools.

ManageEngine Applications Manager stands out with its ability to monitor applications, servers, databases, and IT infrastructures, making it ideal for small to medium businesses seeking a scalable and cost-effective solution. Users benefit from customizable Service Level Management rules, effective Kubernetes monitoring, and frequent software updates. However, there is room for enhancement in agent stability under heavy load conditions, overall scalability, deeper data analysis capabilities, and user experience improvements. Organizations leverage it for application performance monitoring, IT infrastructure management, and service management, incorporating it for application modernization, JVM parameter analysis, and automatic alarm settings. It also facilitates application discovery, dependency mapping, troubleshooting, and cloud service evaluation.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Applications Manager?

Easy-to-Use Dashboard: Offers a user-friendly interface for efficient monitoring.
Comprehensive IT Monitoring: Supports over 80 applications and servers.
Agentless Monitoring: Enables seamless deployment and integration.
Service Level Management: Provides customizable rules to manage services effectively.
Kubernetes Monitoring: Efficiently tracks and manages Kubernetes environments.
Regular Updates: Ensures the software stays up-to-date with new features.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Cost-Effective: Provides a scalable solution suitable for small to medium businesses.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with other management tools.
Customizable Solutions: Offers flexibility to tailor monitoring according to specific business needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Comes with helpful resources for better understanding.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is implemented across various industries for monitoring SQL databases, service incidents, and IT service management. It supports application discovery and troubleshooting, enhancing management of IT services and asset modules. Companies also use it to evaluate potential cloud service options.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

April 2026

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.