Flowgear vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Flowgear and Microsoft are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Flowgear is ranked #28, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4. Flowgear holds a 1.1% mindshare in PaaS, compared to Microsoft’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Flowgear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Flowgear

Read 7 Flowgear reviews

322 Views
319 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 41 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

3,001 Views
3,001 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Flowgear

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Flowgear are leading integration and automation platforms. Users prefer Microsoft Azure Logic Apps for its comprehensive feature set, although Flowgear is appreciated for its flexibility and overall ease of use.

Features: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is praised for its extensive prebuilt connectors, robustness in handling large-scale enterprise tasks, and extensive enterprise-level features. Flowgear is valued for its customizable workflows, dynamic integrations, and overall ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps seek more intuitive design, faster troubleshooting capabilities, and ease-of-use enhancements. Flowgear users desire enhanced scalability options, more in-depth documentation, and better scalability support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps generally has a straightforward deployment process but sometimes struggles with initial setup complexity. Flowgear is noted for its smoother and quicker deployment, paired with responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps users highlight concerns about complex pricing structures but acknowledge substantial ROI from its powerful features. Flowgear offers clear and competitive pricing, promising good value and a quicker ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowgear vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowgear

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

28th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Flowgear is 1.1%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 6.5%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps	6.5%
Flowgear	1.1%
Other	92.4%

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Fulufhelo Sibei

DevOps Engineer at Astute - The Financial Services Exchange

Fast support, good data ingestion, and a nice UI

I am happy with the product. It has solved our business challenges. It is easy to integrate into multiple sources. We did have to use a data transformation tool which would take months to map and transform data that was being dumped into our secure file transfer. Previously, by the time we finished ingesting the data, it was no longer relevant. This has since changed. Therefore, there are no areas needed for improvement.

Read full review

Gayatri Dhawade

Technical Architect at Abcl

Has supported seamless integration flows while requiring improvement in cost transparency

Assessing the ease of connecting disparate systems using Microsoft Azure Logic Apps connectors is simple because we have a Standard Operating Process. If we want to use Logic Apps, we just reserve the instances as per our requirement. Even for Blob storage, we use tokenized endpoints that give us access to this storage account, making it secure. At API Gateway, we have policies that help us implement encryption and decryption. Request parameters are mapped automatically, converted to SOAP, XML, or JSON as needed in different formats. We utilize its monitoring capabilities; Event Grids are used for logging events. Additionally, we have implemented a retry mechanism and are using Azure Monitor for end-to-end request tracing.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Great for data flow."

"It has improved our integration with our data supplier."

"Being able to seamlessly make changes to how one can do mapping visually without having to be a seasoned developer is great."

"The Flowgear tool is helping us reduce the manual work that is done."

"The solution has increased efficiency and productivity and saved us time and money."

"Well-managed version control of workflows and the simplicity in promoting workflows through each environment has aided my team in developing workflows for various environments without the risk of losing development work."

"The no-code visual front end, along with pre-built samples, allows someone with very little technical ability to get an integration up and running."

"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."

"Logic Apps is good for helping us run our access on a cloud environment like Azure. It's much easier, more reliable, and better to maintain."

"It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose."

"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."

"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."

"The product has efficient connectors."

"The product's initial setup phase is something that I don't think is complex because once we start using it, it becomes simple."

"Logic Apps is good for helping us run our access on a cloud environment like Azure. It's much easier, more reliable, and better to maintain."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

Cons

"We would like to see more learning videos for beginners."

"The product needs to improve the self-help tools and samples."

"The initial setup was a bit complex as we were new."

"The software itself needs to keep up with the daily demand to service all clients as the need arises."

"Currently, when designing and testing larger workflows, the sessions timeout and re-authentications are frequently required."

"The product would be nice if it could provide the deployment features in the lower packages."

"The UI could be improved."

"Standard documents are fine, but in certain situations, when facing specific errors or issues, partners or consumers expect customized solutions rather than just links to existing documents."

"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."

"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."

"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."

"The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on."

"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."

"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is good for certain types of workloads, but it doesn't offer many customization options."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The cost of the solution could be cheaper."

"The product is quite cheap."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."

"The licensing is cheaper because, compared to other services, Azure services are much cheaper and affordable."

"Its price depends on the number of transactions, storage capacity, etc., defining if the subscription will be monthly or weekly."

"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."

"The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."

"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Regarding the cost, I find Microsoft Azure Logic Apps to be reasonable; it is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

My experience with their pricing indicates that pricing is complicated to understand and costly. There should be some cost reduction. Currently, I don't have any use case beyond what the readily av...

See all answers

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Flowgear

Compared 33% of the time

Jitterbit Harmony vs Flowgear

Compared 33% of the time

Workato vs Flowgear

Compared 33% of the time

More Flowgear Competitors

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 18% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 10% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 8% of the time

webMethods.io vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear

February 2026

Download Flowgear product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

January 2026

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Also Known As

No data available

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

Overview

Flowgear enables companies of all sizes to increase efficiency and reduce cost by integrating their apps, services, API’s and databases. No coding with 200+ pre-built connectors, reusable workflows and APIs.

Flowgear

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

Buyer's Guide

Flowgear vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

January 2026

Free Report: Flowgear vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowgear vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowgear vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.