Fortify Application Defender vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

OpenText and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. OpenText is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0, while PortSwigger is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 1.2% mindshare in AS, compared to PortSwigger’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.

Fortify Application Defender

Read 11 Fortify Application Defender reviews

1,665 Views
1,382 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews

5,991 Views
3,774 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Fortify Application Defender

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender compete in application security testing. User feedback indicates PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional has an edge due to its affordability and superior customer support, whereas Fortify Application Defender leads in advanced features, particularly in application protection.

Features: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is known for its extensive vulnerability scanning, integration capabilities, and efficient security testing. Fortify Application Defender offers runtime application self-protection, an advanced feature set, and comprehensive real-time protection. The focus of PortSwigger is on scanning, while Fortify emphasizes real-time application protection.

Room for Improvement: PortSwigger could enhance automation and reporting features. It can also strengthen its reporting tools. Fortify Application Defender requires better ease of use, clearer documentation, and improved user interaction. Fortify aims to improve support materials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional offers easy deployment and responsive customer support, suitable for organizations with limited resources. Fortify Application Defender, while equipped with advanced features, faces challenges in deployment complexity and could benefit from more effective customer support.

Pricing and ROI: PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is considered cost-effective with good ROI and transparent pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Fortify Application Defender's advanced features justify its higher price, offering value when specific features are needed, targeting those who prioritize functionality over initial cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Application Defender vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Application Defender vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Application Defender

Ranking in Application Security Tools

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (5th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Fortify Application Defender is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is 2.7%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional	2.7%
Fortify Application Defender	1.2%
Other	96.1%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

VinothSivam

CTO at Abcl

Useful for fast code review in devOps pipelines

I rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten. However, I'm concerned about how it handles an increasing number of lines of code. As the complexity grows, so does the time it takes for the tool to review everything. I want more clarity on how Fortify Application Defender handles multiple threats. We have numerous endpoints, but the tool runs in our pipeline, meaning it operates in the cloud. All our code is configured there, and the tool runs integration testing, unit testing, user testing, and final production code tests. It's a day-to-day experience. It's utilized almost every day as part of our pipeline runs. Each team responsible for integration testing, human testing, user access testing, and preproduction testing runs it whenever they take a build.

Read full review

Moti Huberman

Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks

I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution helped us to improve the code quality of our organization."

"Fortify Application Defender's most valuable features are machine learning algorithms, real-time remediation, and automatic vulnerability notifications."

"The information from Fortify Application Defender on how to fix and solve issues is very good compared to other solutions."

"We are able to provide out customers with a secure application after development. They are no longer left wondering if they are vulnerable to different threats within the market following deployment."

"The most valuable features of Fortify Application Defender are the code packages that are default."

"I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically feed it rules what it's coupled with the WebInspect dynamic application scanning technology."

"Its ability to find security defects is valuable."

More Fortify Application Defender pros

"I found the best value, features and documentation in Burp."

"The most valuable feature is the application security. It also has a reasonable price."

"We are mostly using it for scanning the entire website. So, we basically create a script with the entire website and then run it for different injections."

"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the advanced features, user-friendly interface, and integration with other tools."

"Some of the extensions, available using Burp Extender, are also very good and we have found issues by using them."

""The product is very good just the way it is; It has everything already well established and functions great. I can't see any way for this current version to be improved.""

"Once I capture the proxy, I'm able to transfer across. All the requested information is there. I can send across the request to what we call a repeater, where I get to ready the payload that I send to the application. Put in malicious content and then see if it's responding to it."

"Enables automation of different tasks such as authorization testing."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros

Cons

"The solution could improve the time it takes to scan. When comparing it to SonarQube it does it in minutes while in Fortify Application Defender it can take hours."

"I encountered many false positives for Python applications."

"The false positive rate should be lower."

"The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and security checks. Many independent and open-source tools are available, from Apache to various libraries. Using multiple DevOps pipeline tools can slow the turnaround time."

"The biggest complaint that I have heard concerns additional platform support because right now, it only supports applications that are written in .NET and Java."

"Fortify Application Defender gives a lot of false positives."

"Support for older compilers/IDEs is lacking."

"The solution is quite expensive."

More Fortify Application Defender cons

"Spidering large websites can use a lot of memory and might result in a crash on systems with lower RAM."

"I would like to see a more optimized solution, as it currently uses a lot of CPU power and memory."

"One area for improvement is the integrated browser, Chromium. Single Sign-On (SSO) methods like Microsoft authentication login sometimes fail and show errors. As a workaround, I have to use a different browser, such as Firefox, to log in and make Burp work."

"One area that can be improved, when compared to alternative tools, is that they could provide different reporting options and in different formats like PDF or something like that."

"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."

"There is a lot to this product, and it would be good if when you purchase the tool, they can provide us with a more extensive user manual."

"A lot of our interns find it difficult to get used to PortSwigger Burp's environment."

"There are some memory issues, where the application runs out of memory and crashes."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this solution could be less expensive."

"Fortify Application Defender is very expensive."

"The base licensing costs for the SaaS platform is about $900 USD per application, per year."

"The product’s price is much higher than other tools."

"The licensing is very complex, it's project based and can range from $10,000 to $200,000+ depending on the project type and size."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It comes as an annual cloud subscription. The tool's pricing is around 50 lakhs."

"Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."

"PortSwigger is a bit expensive."

"It is expensive for us in Brazil because the currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep."

"Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution, which is neither cheap nor expensive."

"This is a value for money product."

"The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"It is a cheap solution, but it may not be cheaper than other solutions."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	35

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify Application Defender?

I find the configuration of rules in Fortify Application Defender useful. Its integration is also easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Application Defender?

The product should integrate industry-standard code review tools internally with its system. This would streamline the coding process, as developers wouldn't need multiple tools for code review and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify Application Defender?

We use the solution for fast code review. It is integrated into our DevOps pipeline.

See all answers

Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?

OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...

See all answers

What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?

The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 4% of the time

Klocwork vs Fortify Application Defender

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortify Application Defender Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 13% of the time

Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Compared 6% of the time

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Download Fortify Application Defender product report

Buyer's Guide

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report

Download PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report

Also Known As

HPE Fortify Application Defender, Micro Focus Fortify Application Defender

Burp

Overview

Micro Focus Security Fortify Application Defender is a runtime application self-protection (RASP) solution that helps you manage and mitigate risk from homegrown or third-party applications. It provides centralized visibility into application use and abuse while protecting from software vulnerability exploits and other violations in real time.

OpenText

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

PortSwigger

Sample Customers

ServiceMaster, Saltworks, SAP

Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Application Defender vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

March 2026

Free Report: Fortify Application Defender vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Application Defender vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Application Defender vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.