Fortinet FortiADC vs Fortinet FortiDDoS comparison

The compared Fortinet FortiADC and Fortinet FortiDDoS solutions aren't in the same category. Fortinet FortiADC is ranked #6 in ADC , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 9.8% mindshare in the category. Fortinet FortiDDoS is ranked #12 in DDOS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Fortinet FortiADC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Fortinet FortiDDoS users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiADC

Read 25 Fortinet FortiADC reviews

3,896 Views
2,883 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiDDoS

Read 15 Fortinet FortiDDoS reviews

1,366 Views
1,065 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiADC

Fortinet FortiDDoS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiADC and Fortinet FortiDDoS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetScaler, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).

To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiADC

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (6th)

Fortinet FortiDDoS

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (12th)

Mindshare comparison

Fortinet FortiADC and Fortinet FortiDDoS aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Fortinet FortiADC is designed for Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) and holds a mindshare of 9.8%, up 9.6% compared to last year.
Fortinet FortiDDoS, on the other hand, focuses on Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection, holds 2.4% mindshare, down 2.9% since last year.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fortinet FortiADC	9.8%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)	15.3%
NetScaler	13.2%
Other	61.7%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fortinet FortiDDoS	2.4%
Cloudflare	16.7%
Arbor DDoS	9.8%
Other	71.1%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

GANESAN K

Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited

Has supported load balancing for medical applications and could benefit from more custom configuration options

Some customers need custom management for handling their applications across the servers. Instead of having a predefined solution, if we had space for custom-based algorithms to load balance the traffic, it would be better. We have faced such cases with A10, where we can leverage many custom scripts and do much more. Even though A10 primarily focuses on SMBs, they have also ventured into the enterprise market. Fortinet has been a pioneer for enterprise solutions, such as firewalls, SASE, ZTNA, and SD-WAN solutions, and they are in a leader quadrant. Therefore, they should have more options. From a pricing perspective, it is expensive.

Read full review

Marcos AntonioOliveira

IT Analyst at Evapco, Inc.

Reliable protection and smooth setup enhance company security

Currently, I have two firewalls, with one located in Sorocaba, model 90D, and the other in São Paulo, model 30D. They are connected by VPN. I use the firewalls for VPN and final protection for my company, and my equipment is maintained by an internet company called Multiprox The equipment works…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Content caching and content compression are good features."

"The main feature that we use is GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing). GSLB makes the customer's network more reliable by scaling applications across multiple datacenters. GSLB as a disaster recovery solution can direct traffic based on site availability."

"Ease of use in deploying and having it up and running requires minimal knowledge."

"This ensures that clients can connect to their applications without interruption."

"It's a good product because it supports all the features that ADC solutions in the market can support, like F5 solutions, for example, such as the LTM of F5."

"Because ADC is the intermediary between the servers and the end-user application, it gives thorough information about the traffic, what the problem is."

"Simple to use and easy to integrate."

"The GSLB, the DR side, is the best part. Because we had our main side in one city, we created another, and we had a complete MPLS over the internet. We used the GSLB and data loss for our business applications."

More Fortinet FortiADC pros

"The solution already has security profiles and it can protect from DDoS attacks and other kinds of attacks."

"It allows me to see all the traffic on my network."

"Among its key features: Detects and mitigates DDoS attacks at L3 to L7; negligible to zero false-positives; Generates and sends reports without the need for an expensive third-party solution."

"I find the interface easy to use."

"We have researched them all, and it's a good solution all around."

"The product allows the users to adjust the thresholds."

"The protection resources and the support are valuable features of the solution."

"It is a user-friendly product in terms of monitoring and updating policies."

More Fortinet FortiDDoS pros

Cons

"I think it would be helpful if Fortinet put more video examples on their cookbook site."

"Fortinet has some drawbacks, and it can be a bit challenging to scale."

"Setup could be easier. The company's homework is to redesign those menus to configure with the smallest number of steps."

"It would be good if they built in a fully functional web application firewall."

"The product's stability for VMs could be better."

"Because it is so generic, the documentation requires special attention. A person who has not worked on Fortinet FortiADC or a similar product will struggle to understand what the document is trying to say. The documentation could be more specific, and more detailed."

"When the FortiADC is part of a platform with components like FortiManager and FortiGate, automation and pushing configuration are very inconvenient."

"Issues with SSL and encrypted traffic."

More Fortinet FortiADC cons

"The main improvement would be to change the firewall model, however, currently, everything is fixed and working well."

"The web interface could be much better."

"The challenge lies within the customer environment, particularly in Brazil, where companies have stringent security requirements for implementing solutions."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"The primary area for improvement is the on-premises capacity limit, currently fixed at 10 GB."

"There aren't really any aspects of the solution we are unhappy with. It's been a positive experience overall."

"The tool needs to focus more on the area of application traffic management, where it currently has some shortcomings."

"All the thresholds that need to be configured should be included in the default so that user will not forget or misconfigure."

More Fortinet FortiDDoS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has affordable pricing."

"The price is competitive"

"Our basic license excludes features such as antivirus and IDS. Due to license limitations, some functionalities are not configured."

"Compared to F5, FortiADC pricing is better."

"The solution's pricing is an issue and should be improved."

"The product has average pricing. I rate its pricing a five out of ten."

"The solution could be more cost-effective."

"They offer a perpetual license."

More Fortinet FortiADC pricing and cost advice

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"It's quite pricey."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?

For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc.

See all answers

Do you recommend Fortinet FortiADC?

I recommend Fortinet FortiADC. My experience with Fortinet has been very positive. Our company has been using it for around five years. We mainly use FortiADC for the load balancing of application ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiADC?

The user interface is very easy and integrates with Sandbox easily.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiDDoS?

The product's initial setup phase was really easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiDDoS?

Fortinet FortiDDoS offers lower costs compared to other solutions. The licensing costs are annually renewed.

See all answers

Comparisons

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Fortinet FortiADC

Compared 37% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Fortinet FortiADC

Compared 14% of the time

NetScaler vs Fortinet FortiADC

Compared 14% of the time

Kemp LoadMaster vs Fortinet FortiADC

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Fortinet FortiADC

Compared 1% of the time

More Fortinet FortiADC Competitors

Arbor DDoS vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 20% of the time

Radware DDoS vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 9% of the time

VMware NSX vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Shield vs Fortinet FortiDDoS

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiDDoS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiADC

January 2026

Download Fortinet FortiADC product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

January 2026

Download Fortinet FortiDDoS product report

Also Known As

FortiADC Application Delivery Controller, FortiADC

Fortinet DDoS, FortiDDos

Overview

Fortinet FortiADC is a robust application delivery controller (ADC) that delivers application optimization, application security, and application availability. FortiADC is a valued offering from Fortinet, which is widely recognized as a trusted supplier of dynamic security solutions worldwide. FortiADC offers dynamic security functions (AV, DDoS, and WAF) in addition to advanced application connectors for a simplified deployment and complete transparency to an organization's networks and applications. FortiADC offers three primary deployment options: physical machine, virtual machine, (VM) and cloud solution options.

Fortinet FortiADC Benefits

FortiADC security protocol: FortiADC integrates with FortiSandbox to improve the overall antivirus security protections where every file is scanned for known and unknown malicious risks. If a file is identified as malicious or problematic, it will be blocked in the future.
SSL protocol: FortiADC securely uses the most up-to-date cryptography to provide exceptional encryption and decryption using a hardware-based SSL ASIC. FortiADC offers complete transparency to inspect all traffic for threats, improves server response time, and reduces backend server load, SSL inspection and SSL offloading. FortiADC integrates seamlessly with Gemalto’s SafeNet Hardware Security Module (HSM).
FortiADC connectors: FortiADC Fabric Connectors offer open API-based integration and coordination with numerous software-defined networks (SDNs), third-party partners, and cloud management providers. Fortinet Fabric Connectors provide deep open and turnkey integration with recognized third-party vendors such as AWS, K8s, OCI, and SAP, in multi-vendor solutions, improving scalability, simplified management, and automation.
Business stability: FortiADC load balancing for on-premise global server load balancing (GSBL) and in the cloud (FortiGSBL Cloud) will ensure users can maintain a reliable and available network by improving the ability of scaling applications throughout numerous data centers to reduce application response times and enhance disaster recovery. Users are able to define protocols based on network latency concerns, overall data performance, and site availability.

Fortinet FortiADC Features

Application availability
- 4-7 application load balancing: DNS, HTTPS, RTMP, RADIUS, MySQL and more
- External fabric connectors: Splunk Integration, AWS/OCI Connector, Kubernetes Service.
- Security fabric connectors: FortiSIEM, Fortigate BanIP Integration, FortiAnalyzer, and more.
- Deployment modes: High availability (AA/AP Failover), Router mode, transparent mode (switch), one-arm mode (proxy with X-forwarded for support.
Web application firewall (WAF)
- Security services: Captcha support, cookie support, HTTP header security, XML/SOAP/JSON validation, CSRF protection, API gateway, and more.
- Application security: Web attack signature, bot detection, web vulnerability scanner, OWASP Top-10 Wizard, API protection and more.

Application enhancement
- HTTP and TCP improvement: TCP buffering, HTTP compressions/decompression, HTTP caching (dynamic and static objects), Bandwidth monitoring using quality of service (QoS), TCP buffering, and more.
- Authentication offloading: Two-factor authentication (Fortitoken/Fortitoken Cloud and Google Authentication), NTLM, AUTH2.0, SAML 2.0 (SP and Idp) RADIUS, LDAP, Kerbos, and local.
- Networking: Integration with Ansible, Cisco ACI, OpenStack and Nutanix, NVGRE and VXLAN support, VLAN and port trunking support, IPv6 Support (SLB, firewall, routing and interfaces), Dynamic NAT, Hide NAT, Static NAT for added scalability and flexibility.
- Management: Syslog support, SNMP using private MIBs with threshold-based traps. REST APIs, VDOMS, data analytics, real-time monitoring graphs, role-based monitoring, intuitive reporting, FortiView integration, and more.

Fortinet

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are ever-evolving and use a variety of technologies. To successfully combat these attacks, you need a dynamic, multi-layered security solution. FortiDDoS protects from both known and zero day attacks with very low latency. It’s easy to deploy and manage, and includes comprehensive reporting and analysis tools.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about NetScaler, F5, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.