Fortinet FortiAP vs Omada Access Points comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Fortinet is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while TP-Link is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0. Fortinet holds a 3.6% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiAP

Read 17 Fortinet FortiAP reviews

4,695 Views
4,695 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,775 Views
3,737 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiAP

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Omada Access Points and Fortinet FortiAP compete in the wireless networking space. Omada Access Points are favored for their cost-effectiveness, while Fortinet FortiAP is seen as superior due to its robust features.

Features: Omada Access Points offer seamless integration and centralized management, making them ideal for small to medium businesses. They excel in wired and wireless connectivity and ease of management. Fortinet FortiAPs include advanced security features like threat detection and prevention, seamless integration with other Forti products, and centralized control through a single console.

Room for Improvement: Omada Access Points could enhance their security features and expand advanced monitoring tools to match enterprise needs. They may also benefit from expanding the mesh networking capabilities. Fortinet FortiAPs could work on simplifying their complex setup for less technical users, improve their cost structure, and provide better interoperability with non-Fortinet products.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points provide straightforward deployment with an intuitive setup process and dependable customer support. Fortinet FortiAPs offer a reliable deployment process with extensive technical support, beneficial for demanding environments requiring detailed service.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points are notable for their low-cost setup and high ROI, owing to affordable pricing and minimal maintenance costs. Fortinet FortiAPs, despite a higher initial investment, deliver substantial ROI through their advanced security features, appealing to enterprises focusing on performance and security enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAP

Ranking in Wireless LAN

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAP is 3.6%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 3.0%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiAP	3.6%
Omada Access Points	3.0%
Other	93.4%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

StaffordSlater

Co Founder And Consultant at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Unified branch management has simplified deployment and improved wireless security and visibility

Fortinet FortiAP's zero-touch deployment feature with FortiManager is utilized in the current deployment. Zero-touch provisioning with FortiManager enables deployment and configuration that is very useful, leading to huge cost savings. As long as everything is deployed and plugged in, you can push an image to the firewall, and it pushes it out to the switches and all the APs. The deployment time is a lot quicker as a result. Currently, there is not a lack of function in Fortinet FortiAP. The organization is satisfied with it. Everything is managed via FortiManager in a multi-tenanted, cloud deployment model, as the organization is an MSP, so it works well. Pricing for Fortinet FortiAP is rated as an eight, as it is a lot cheaper than Meraki. I would recommend Fortinet FortiAP to other users. I would give this review an overall rating of nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fortinet FortiAP's zero-touch deployment feature with FortiManager is utilized in the current deployment, enabling deployment and configuration that is very useful, leading to huge cost savings."

"The solution supports recent security components like encryption or hashing algorithms. We can control the APs from FortiGate Firewalls and integrate those APs into FortiGate. You don't have to purchase a separate controller for it."

"If we have FortiClient installed on multiple devices, it is seamless to connect with FortiAP. It supports passwordless authentication as well. That is a great thing about it."

"We really don't need to call technical support. Any time we have had to call, they've been great."

"I always recommend to customers who have a FortiGate firewall to choose Fortinet FortiAP instead of deploying any other wireless controller or OEM because it provides a single posture of security and a single management console, is easy to use, easy to deploy, and offers central management with FortiGate."

"The most valuable aspect of Fortinet FortiAP is the support."

"The setup was straightforward."

"I like FortiAP's performance and stability. The reporting is also quite good."

More Fortinet FortiAP pros

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"This product is easy to use."

"Its sturdiness and cost-effectiveness are the most valuable features."

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"Technical support is a pain. Fortinet has to get its act together. If you don't pay for premium service, you will have issues."

"The wireless functionality is not the best."

"There is nothing that particularly comes to mind for improvement."

"FortiAP is very good in an indoor environment, but we are struggling with the outdoor environment."

"The product fails to offer default access points to deal with the areas revolving around configurations."

"The support offered by the solution has certain shortcomings, making it in areas where improvements are required."

"A point for improvement for Fortinet FortiAP would be improvements in the GUI, which is adequate but could be improved."

"The security integration between the network and firewall has room for improvement."

More Fortinet FortiAP cons

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"The quality of the hardware needs to be improved."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

"We have not been satisfied with the performance of TP-Link Auranet EAP."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I would rate FortiAP a six."

"If I compare it with the other enterprise products, the price is good."

"FortiAP is more expensive than some other options."

"We purchased perpetual licensing, and additional costs may vary depending on the services acquired from Fortinet."

"The product is available at a very comfortable price for my company compared to the other products available in the market. The prices of products from Meraki and Aruba are high compared to those of Fortinet."

"Fortinet FortiAP offers a more cost-effective solution compared to Palo Alto and Check Point."

"The devices under Fortinet are not expensive. The solution's licensing part is expensive."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for FortiAP?

Fortinet FortiAP is affordable, not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with FortiAP?

A point for improvement for Fortinet FortiAP would be improvements in the GUI, which is adequate but could be improved. Additionally, wireless coverage and the mapping area are fairly static and co...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FortiAP?

Fortinet FortiAP is currently used mainly on branch deployments because of the single pane of management across the whole branch using the FortiGate, FortiAP, and FortiSwitch. I have utilized Forti...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TP-Link Auranet EAP?

Omada is a good solution that I would recommend, and it is less expensive while providing good results. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ruckus Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 13% of the time

Aruba Access Points vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Fortinet FortiAP

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiAP Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 13% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

D-Link Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 3% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAP

September 2026

Download Fortinet FortiAP product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

September 2026

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

No data available

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Fortinet FortiAP provides wireless network access for industries such as banking, healthcare, and logistics. It enhances connectivity with FortiGate and FortiSwitch, ensuring secure data exchange in settings like offices and malls.

Fortinet FortiAP is integral for managing connected devices across sectors. It integrates seamlessly with Fortinet products, enhancing security and connectivity. Users benefit from a unified console that simplifies configuration and monitoring without additional controllers. The support for passwordless authentication and cloud visibility adds value, while its use in environments like shopping centers and offices facilitates secure data sharing and access.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiAP?

Integration with FortiGate and FortiAnalyzer: Simplifies network management and monitoring.
Passwordless Authentication: Enhances security and accessibility.
Cloud Dashboard: Provides comprehensive visibility over network activities.
Direct Control from FortiGate: Eliminates the need for separate controllers.
SSID Customization: Supports tailoring of wireless access.

What benefits should users expect from Fortinet FortiAP?

Efficient Network Management: Centralized control and configuration simplify operations.
Comprehensive Reporting: Transparent insights for improved decision-making.
Secure Access: Protects data through advanced security measures.
Seamless Connectivity: Improves user experience with simplified networking.

In industries like banking and healthcare, Fortinet FortiAP is deployed to enhance network security and provide reliable access. Retailers leverage its capabilities in shopping centers, while warehouses benefit from its reliable connectivity to support seamless operations. Managed service providers use it to deliver tailored solutions, ensuring effective network segmentation and coverage.

Fortinet

Omada Access Points deliver high performance and easy setup for both wired and wireless technologies. Ideal for business applications, they provide centralized cloud management and secure VPN implementation.

Designed to enhance network control and efficiency, Omada Access Points are user-friendly, allowing straightforward deployment and integration with network needs. While offering cost-effectiveness and a modern interface, areas for improvement include scaling capabilities, coverage, security tools, and technical support. API integration, distance coverage, and speed require attention, and updates to newer Wi-Fi versions could bolster performance.

What are the key features of Omada Access Points?

High Performance: Ensures robust connectivity.
Reliability: Consistent network stability.
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable for businesses.
Easy Setup: Simplified configuration process.
Centralized Cloud Management: Streamlines administration.
Secure VPN Implementation: Enhances security measures.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Improved network operations.
Network Control: Better management capabilities.
Business Integration: Ideal for business environments.
User-Friendly Design: Simplifies deployment and use.

Omada Access Points are widely implemented in SMBs, offices, and campgrounds, often used by telecom operators and businesses for ERP and cloud applications. They enhance connectivity in industrial and commercial contexts, facilitating wireless network design for residential and client use.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points

September 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiAP vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.