Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs Omada Access Points comparison

Juniper and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Juniper is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6, while TP-Link is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Juniper holds a 5.2% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Read 24 Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points reviews

4,564 Views
4,564 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,091 Views
3,060 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Omada Access Points and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are competing products in the networking solutions category. Juniper Mist has an edge over Omada due to its superior AI-driven features and enhanced network performance.

Features: Omada Access Points provide seamless integration with networking hardware, ensuring cost-effective solutions and scalable network management. They offer ease of deployment, centralized cloud management, and compatibility with wired and wireless technologies. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are known for advanced AI-driven features like proactive network monitoring, detailed analytics, and a comprehensive virtual network assistant, enhancing network performance and management. Additionally, they feature high performance, dynamic packet capture, and centralized management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Omada Access Points could benefit from enhanced AI-integrated analytics, greater security measures, and improved reporting capabilities. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points would improve with more competitive pricing, simplified license management, and increased user interface customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points are praised for their simple installation and accessibility, ideal for small to mid-sized networks. They are easily deployable with centralized cloud management for streamlined network control. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points leverage a cloud-driven deployment model, significantly reducing setup complexity and streamlining network management. While both products offer reliable support, Juniper stands out with its extensive AI-driven features, simplifying network oversight.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points are celebrated for competitive setup costs and affordability, making them appealing to budget-conscious buyers. They provide satisfactory ROI through cost-effective network scalability. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, although priced higher, yield substantial ROI with innovative features and improved network efficiency. The decision often balances immediate cost savings with the long-term value offered by Juniper's advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...

Ranking in Wireless LAN

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is 5.2%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.0%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points	5.2%
Omada Access Points	4.0%
Other	90.8%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

AmbikaBhunia

Pre Sales Network at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees

AI insights have improved wireless visibility and now proactively prevent network issues

I am somewhat uncertain about the room for improvement for Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points because I am sure that some concepts will be incorporated in the future. Recently, HP acquired Juniper, and now under the HP umbrella, we have both Aruba and Juniper Mist, which raises questions about how to compete in the market. Customers often ask me to compare them, and I have to pitch both even though they are from the same organization. Regarding gaps for improvement for Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, I think pricing is a complicated issue since Cisco can drastically reduce prices, unlike Juniper.

Read full review

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."

"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."

"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."

"The most useful functions or features in Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are the insights that tell you what is going on inside your Wi-Fi network, and you can easily find that on the dashboard with analytics."

"The solution is very secure."

"The most effective features in the Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points include the fact that it's completely cloud-managed, the Marvis AI agent, the ease of use, and the user-friendly interface, along with a plethora of features."

"It's well-detailed in terms of troubleshooting logs."

"The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is its price."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"Omada Access Points are very good in terms of wired technologies and wired connectivity."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"It would be helpful to have even stronger security features to help protect against interference from other nearby access points that aren't part of our network."

"The reporting logs require improvement in terms of clarity because it can be difficult to find specific information about network influences."

"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."

"I suggest that the AI tool in the Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points needs to be a little bit more ChatGPT-like, allowing easier communication in normal language instead of requiring specific prompts."

"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."

"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."

"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."

"The solution is expensive."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points cons

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"The technical support could be improved."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Juniper Mist's pricing a ten out of ten since it is expensive."

"I rate the product price as a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive. It is a reasonably priced tool."

"The solution is expensive."

"We pay maybe 1000 SEK per year, per access point."

"Juniper Wireless AP's price is a little more expensive than other solutions, but you get what you pay for."

"If a customer has a budget of around five lakhs in Indian currency, they can afford Juniper products."

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is something Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) can work on. The pricing is very high compared to the competition."

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points pricing and cost advice

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

The solution is very secure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

Regarding pricing, Juniper's cost rates as a seven on a scale where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 23% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 21% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 14% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Dell Technologies Ruckus vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

Compared 1% of the time

More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points

January 2026

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points report

Download Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

January 2026

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.

Juniper

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

December 2025

Free Report: Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.