GoCD vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

Thoughtworks and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Thoughtworks is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3, while IBM is ranked #6. Thoughtworks holds a 1.6% mindshare in RA, compared to IBM’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Thoughtworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

411 Views
55 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,615 Views
322 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

GoCD

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

GoCD and UrbanCode Deploy compete in the CI/CD space, each offering distinct strengths. While GoCD is valued for its open-source nature and straightforward pipeline modeling, UrbanCode Deploy excels with comprehensive deployment automation, justifying its higher cost for large enterprises.

Features: GoCD emphasizes pipeline visualization, a user-friendly interface, and role differentiation in pipeline groups. In contrast, UrbanCode Deploy stands out with flexible deployment options, rich plugins, and automated approvals, accommodating complex enterprise requirements.

Room for Improvement: GoCD could benefit from a broader range of plugins and improved support services. Its permission management can be further enhanced to aid large enterprises. UrbanCode Deploy, while offering extensive features, may need a more intuitive user interface and simpler integration methods. Its cost can also be a limiting factor for smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD provides a straightforward deployment process, ideal for smaller teams that need quick setups. UrbanCode Deploy offers extensive deployment tools and superior customer service, suiting enterprises with intricate needs. However, GoCD's simplicity highlights a gap in post-deployment support when compared to UrbanCode Deploy's advanced services.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD’s open-source status ensures low entry costs, appealing to budget-conscious teams. UrbanCode Deploy demands higher initial investment due to its robust feature set; this investment pays off for large operations needing comprehensive deployment solutions. Its pricing aligns with its enterprise-grade capabilities, providing substantial ROI in expansive environments.

To learn more, read our detailed GoCD vs. UrbanCode Deploy Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. UrbanCode Deploy

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoCD

Ranking in Release Automation

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (14th), Build Automation (16th)

UrbanCode Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of GoCD is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UrbanCode Deploy is 6.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Nishant Narayan Singh

DevOps Architect at Cognizant

Simplifies the pipeline process, but the access control system needs enhancement

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified. The folder structure is another aspect that could be enhanced, as all jobs are displayed on a single page without the clear organization seen in Jenkins. Implementing a more structured approach to organizing jobs would improve user experience. AI could simplify job creation. For example, instead of manually editing pipelines as code, an AI tool could allow users to input variables and automatically generate the required jobs. It would help reduce human errors, such as issues that arise from incorrect edits in large code files.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"The UI is colorful."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

Cons

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Educational Organization

32%

Financial Services Firm

31%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoCD?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 32% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 30% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GoCD

Compared 11% of the time

Tekton vs GoCD

Compared 10% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 33% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 22% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 16% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 10% of the time

BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download GoCD product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

June 2025

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

uDeploy

Overview

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. UrbanCode Deploy

June 2025

Free Report: GoCD vs. UrbanCode Deploy

Find out what your peers are saying about GoCD vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoCD vs. UrbanCode Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.