

OpenVPN Access Server and GoodAccess compete in the VPN industry, each offering unique features tailored to diverse business requirements. OpenVPN Access Server seems to have the upper hand due to its open-source nature, providing strong encryption and configurability appealing to users seeking customization and affordability.
Features: OpenVPN Access Server is noted for its strong encryption, open-source availability, and high configurability, allowing users to customize their VPN experience fully. It supports multi-platform clients, enhancing its broad usability. GoodAccess excels with its ease of use, static IP capability, and point-to-point security, ensuring secure connections and maintaining good network speed.
Room for Improvement: OpenVPN Access Server users suggest enhancing the interface and administrative GUI for improved usability, as well as expanding configuration and security features. In contrast, GoodAccess could benefit from refining interface details and expanding server coverage. Users also suggest improving pricing models to better accommodate smaller teams and refining user management features for enhanced value.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenVPN Access Server is advantageous for on-premises deployment with versatile integration capabilities across public and hybrid cloud environments. It offers strong community support, providing extensive documentation and active user-supported forums. GoodAccess is praised for its straightforward hybrid and public cloud deployment process and adequate customer service, though OpenVPN's community-driven model offers a unique support experience.
Pricing and ROI: OpenVPN Access Server provides a cost-effective VPN solution due to its open-source nature, enhancing its ROI by combining ease of use with robust security features without significant costs. GoodAccess, though competitively priced and scalable, may present higher costs for additional features, potentially affecting smaller organizations. Both solutions are recognized for their ROI capabilities, although OpenVPN Access Server is notably attractive for those needing a reliable and low-cost option.
Now, with the SAML and Active Directory integration, the process is down to under two minutes, which frees up our senior staff to focus on critical infrastructure tasks instead of managing access tickets.
The platform automatically reads the user role and maps them to the correct network subnets instantly, saving us countless hours of administration overhead every month.
The relevant metrics show that it saves time in terms of implementation and adoption.
I would definitely rate customer support 10 out of 10.
The ticketing system is responsive, and the technical team knows the product inside and out.
My advice is to map out your user access groups and routing subnets before configuring the server; this makes it easier to enforce least privilege.
When we deploy and install OpenVPN Access Server, the principle is to install and forget.
You can easily upgrade the underlying hardware resources or spin up additional nodes in a cluster configuration if you need to handle a massive surge in concurrent users.
It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.
OpenVPN Access Server is 100% stable in my experience.
Regarding stability, I have not had any crashes, performance issues, or stability issues with OpenVPN Access Server.
OpenVPN Access Server is very stable, and we have a hassle-free work experience using it.
I would like to see more options and more granular controls for users who know what they are doing as an administrator.
Lastly, it would be awesome to see native support for newer, lighter protocols through WireGuard built straight into the platform alongside standard OpenVPN for better performance efficiency.
Additionally, native support for newer, lighter protocols like WireGuard built straight into the platform alongside standard OpenVPN for better performance efficiency would be beneficial.
With WireGuard, which is locked down over UDP, it is harder for attackers to probe ports.
The sticker price may look clear, but the real cost includes the time spent untangling subscription limitations, account conflicts, sales handoffs, and unclear guidance.
My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OpenVPN Access Server is really good, not that expensive.
GoodAccess has positively impacted my organization as we have fewer IPs to whitelist and limited access for anybody outside of our organization into our internal systems.
The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points.
The main benefits I have seen from using OpenVPN Access Server include secure access to private resources over the public internet.
OpenVPN Access Server has positively impacted my organization by allowing access to our private services, enhancing security, and enabling remote work from anywhere.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenVPN Access Server | 11.7% |
| GoodAccess | 1.0% |
| Other | 87.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 43 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform enabling medium-sized enterprises to implement Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) effortlessly, offering protection for remote and hybrid workforces.
GoodAccess empowers enterprises by providing a low-code, hardware-free SASE/SSE platform. It simplifies deploying zero trust architectures quickly, integrating with both modern SaaS applications and legacy systems. This makes it an ideal choice for businesses with 50-5,000 employees, particularly those adopting multi-cloud and SaaS environments. GoodAccess safeguards infrastructures by unifying them under a stringent zero-trust model, utilizing advanced technologies to address major cybersecurity challenges.
What are the key features of GoodAccess?GoodAccess finds application in industries focusing on remote work, particularly those needing secure point-to-point network connections. It serves technical teams seeking to optimize cloud operations, enhance network management, and ensure compliance. The platform is valuable for organizations aiming to support a hybrid workforce and achieve robust endpoint protection.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise provides secure, scalable remote access with strong encryption and cross-platform compatibility, leveraging open-source flexibility for cost-effectiveness. It's ideal for connecting remote workers, maintaining privacy, and securing network communications.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is renowned for its ease of setup and adaptability, supporting Linux and different operating systems, which ensures robust security and seamless integration across network scenarios. With features like two-factor authentication and customizable installers, it emphasizes privacy and remote connectivity. While it offers robust documentation and community support, there are challenges with user management due to the lack of a simple GUI. Users note stability issues under heavy traffic, and improvements in security features and configuration automation are desired. Despite these areas for enhancement, it remains a reliable choice for secure remote access.
What are the key features?
What benefits and ROI should users seek?
In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise secures sensitive data while enabling remote access across LANs and VPCs. It's utilized for encrypted traffic protection, facilitating site-to-site VPNs, and connecting mobile workers securely, thus maintaining data integrity in interoffice communications and IoT platforms.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.