GTB Technologies Inspector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

GTB Technologies and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. GTB Technologies is ranked #29, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.9. GTB Technologies holds a 1.5% mindshare in DLP, compared to Microsoft’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GTB Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

GTB Technologies Inspector and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention compete in the field of data protection solutions. Microsoft Purview has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and strong integration with Microsoft ecosystem services.

Features: GTB Technologies Inspector provides real-time data discovery, risk analysis, and control over sensitive information. Microsoft Purview offers extensive data classification, regulatory compliance improvements, and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, covering a broader scope of protection.

Room for Improvement: GTB could enhance its interoperability with diverse software environments and expand its data classification capabilities. It might also benefit from additional integration options with third-party applications. Microsoft Purview could enhance its cost-efficiency and reduce complexity for new users, and further optimize its mobile device management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GTB Technologies Inspector offers an easy deployment model with minimal disruption and highly responsive customer service. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention benefits from integration with Microsoft 365, enabling streamlined deployment for users within the Microsoft ecosystem and strong ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: GTB Technologies Inspector presents a cost-effective solution with flexible pricing and user-friendly payment options, leading to significant ROI. In contrast, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, while having higher setup costs, provides substantial ROI through its advanced features and integration benefits, appealing to those seeking comprehensive data governance solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare One

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Cloudflare One is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GTB Technologies Inspector is 1.5%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is 6.7%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	6.7%
Cloudflare One	2.1%
GTB Technologies Inspector	1.5%
Other	89.7%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Cobe Van Coller

Network Architect at IP Dimension

Cloud security has improved remote access and has reduced costs for smaller client sites

I have used Cloudflare One's Identity-Aware Proxy, and it is quite straightforward from what I have seen so far. The app registration on the Azure side integrates fully into Cloudflare, and I am very satisfied with that part because it is easy to set up. The integration of Cloudflare One's Secure Web Gateway and Zero Trust Network Access works without any issues. That part is pretty automatic, and if you complete the rest of the setup, it comes together by itself with no issues from my side. What makes it nice is that we can actually start replacing on-site firewalls at this stage for the smaller clients because it does not matter if they go to a coffee shop or work from home; they are still secured by the same connection. The hops get shorter and you get better latency. We have done testing to see if it is better. One thing that we did notice with our proof of concept with our current client is that they have people connecting from the UK. When they used their previous VPN solution, uploading CAD drawings and other files to the server took a long time. They mentioned that it is much quicker on Cloudflare One's solution. I definitely believe that is part of the improved performance, and I am satisfied with that as well. What is nice about Cloudflare One is that it makes the setup easier and also easier to train technicians to maintain it. Compared to legacy systems, we do not need to get fancy firewalls in place that are costly. That is definitely also a cost-saver with Cloudflare One.

Read full review

Marcelo Grandchamp

General Manager (Founder and Owner) at nnhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marcelograndchamp/ovax

Enables organizations to monitor the network and protect themselves from data leakage

The initial setup process is very simple and easy. We have no issues to do it for ourselves or our customers. The deployment takes less than 20 days. The integration is very simple. However, first, we must understand what we want to have on our network and what we want to prevent. If we don't have this information before we start the configuration, we will be lost. We must know what kind of protection we need in our company. We have LGPD in Brazil. It is similar to GDPR in Europe. It prevents any personal information from being linked to other companies without permission. We have to take care of the personal information of our customers, employees, and partners. To deploy the tool, we must understand what we need to do. We must download the whole package and have our infrastructure ready to receive it. We must get the SSL certification and start to configure our platform. When the process is finished, we must roll out a small portion of our network to ensure everything will be well. After that, we must do the full rollout.

Read full review

ClayHampton

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Protects sensitive data across devices and helps address client compliance needs proactively

The reporting in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is a little easier than most Microsoft portals. I understand the licensing cost, especially if you're a Business Premium or in the SMB world, and a lot of clients run with a Business Premium. That comes with data loss prevention in a manual process, whereas E5 gives automation. Microsoft has said, 'Okay, here's your Microsoft 365 E5 compliance add-on that can go on the Business Premium.' So Business Premium users can get the data loss prevention features of E5, which is fantastic. That was the big point that they were missing, and I'm glad that they actually have an add-on now that makes it possible. So truly, I don't think there's a downside. Maybe more reporting, but that's it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using Cloudflare One makes my work quite easy because for DDoS protection, all I need to do is understand the OSI model and click; it makes it easier than trying to write a command line or use a Linux command."

"The blocking feature is very good."

"The best feature is rate limiting. If I'm expecting 500 visits per hour, Cloudflare will limit the requests if I suddenly get 50,000."

"It's the endpoint exposition. We don't need to expose our VPN server to the internet and need a zero-test solution. I can apply some conditional access to the endpoint that's connecting to our network to check their security policies or the security condition of their workstation. Once the workstation is trying to connect to my internal network, then I would like to check the discrete condition of these endpoints that are trying to access my internal network. We created some conditional access. We have CrowdStrike, to check if the CrowdStrike is installed, to check if it's updated, and to check for Windows updates. We created some conditional policies to check it."

"It's a perfect solution from my perspective; it's easy to understand and easy to configure."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable features as almost no effort was needed to learn the configurations. It is also one of the cheapest firewalls available in this category."

"Enables me to work from two locations."

"Cloudflare is simple to use."

More Cloudflare One pros

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."

"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."

"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."

"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification."

"The product has a centralized console for everything."

"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."

"All features in GTB are very valuable and effective."

More GTB Technologies Inspector pros

"We have not seen any sensitive files leave via email, which represents a significant improvement."

"Earlier, our customers had no control at all over compliance, and confidential documents that were going out were not at all looked into, and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention has been a huge benefit to our clients in this regard."

"The product has improved compliance and confidence. We are aware of the data that is leaving our organization. It provides confidence in data management and information storage."

"The auto-labeling feature is definitely the most valuable feature, as it goes in and labels the documents for you in different repositories, covering the Outlook and Exchange repositories along with SharePoint and OneDrive, which is really helpful in those areas."

"There's a good amount of documentation in case you run into any problems."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's ability to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information is valuable."

"The solution is very stable and extremely reliable."

"Microsoft Purview's classification and policy controls impact users' productivity within my organization very positively, as it does not get in the way of their working."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"Lacks a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."

"Our subscription plan for the solution has a limitation of bot signatures."

"For the topic of improvement, providing some training material is one of my suggestions."

"I would like them to include a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."

"From a logging perspective, it is still a bit difficult to see exactly what users are being blocked with the current views."

"Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar."

"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."

"Feedback could be enhanced. While I work efficiently with Clover as a partner in Mexico City, sometimes the information and requests are easier to manage with more concrete solutions."

More Cloudflare One cons

"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."

"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."

"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."

"The performance could be better."

"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."

"The tool should include better AI features."

"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."

"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac, so we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."

More GTB Technologies Inspector cons

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's licensing is expensive."

"The main disadvantages of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention in comparison to the Netscope product are notable considerations."

"It could cover more solutions and technologies."

"The platform can be challenging to navigate and has the potential for improvement."

"There is a need for improvements, particularly in ensuring that file-based recognition is more reliable and comprehensive."

"The solution should provide better integration with other systems."

"The only concern is that it forces clients to use an expensive license."

"I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap. The licensing cost is also very low. I rate the cost and pricing a three out of ten."

"The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice."

"The solution is not that expensive."

"The solution's pricing lacks transparency."

"The prices are slightly expensive."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There are no hidden charges apart from the licensing costs of the solution."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten."

"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."

"The tool has a fair price."

"The tool is not expensive."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."

"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"It's a little bit pricey compared to competitors, but it's not too high."

"It is a part of our Microsoft licensing. We pay for a yearly renewal. Its price is reasonable for the size of the organization we are. It is fairly competitive, and you get what you pay for. We have an E5 license, and a part of understanding the E5 license is to see what all you get with it. If you really look at it from that standpoint, you get a lot of value. You have Defender and all its security features in there as well. Their licensing is fairly flexible. They have different programs. We've seen ones where you could pay for up to three to five years in advance. There is also a monthly pay-as-you-go type of deal, but we're doing a yearly renewal and fixing the budget."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The cost works out to about $15 per user per month."

"We are using the E3 license for Microsoft 365 with the E5 compliance license add-on."

"Though I am not a specialist, the tool is quite expensive."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access has strong integration with Microsoft, among other platforms. However, when it comes to Kaspersky, ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access provides secure access to internal applications for employees, external members of the organization...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Cloudflare Access?

Cloudflare Access is one of the best integrations available. While about two hundred vendors offer similar services, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GTB Technologies Inspector?

The tool should include better AI features. It must enable us to make some predictions based on the behavior of my ne...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GTB Technologies Inspector?

We use Microsoft 365. We use GTB Technologies Inspector as a CASB solution to protect us from any data leakage in Mic...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GTB Technologies Inspector?

The maintenance is easy. We are resellers and partners. We have technical people specialized in maintenance. The TCO ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that everything is included in our enterprise licensing...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

To improve Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, I think it would be helpful if we could make bulk labeling easier,...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

My main use cases involve trying to prevent sensitive files from leaving the company. Any sensitive data that the bus...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

FortiSASE vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

Twingate vs Cloudflare One

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloudflare One Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 22% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 15% of the time

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

Trellix DLP vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

Netwrix Endpoint Protector vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 5% of the time

More GTB Technologies Inspector Competitors

Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare One

May 2026

Download Cloudflare One product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

May 2026

Download GTB Technologies Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

April 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Cloudflare Bot Management, Cloudflare Gateway, Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform, Cloudflare DDoS, Cloudflare SASE & SSE Platform

Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP

Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP

Overview

Cloudflare One is a comprehensive platform for security, performance, and connectivity. It provides features like rate limiting, DDoS protection, and application access, tailored to enhance user experience while securing internet access and accelerating communications.

Designed to integrate security measures with ease of use and scalability, Cloudflare One offers a secure web gateway and zero trust network access. These features ensure seamless setup and operation, making connectivity reliable and protected. Users appreciate its integrated console, intuitive interface, and the ability to manage risk effectively. It offers straightforward deployment, improves latency, and boasts cost-effectiveness. While its onboarding process and documentation need enhancement, its value in content delivery and application shielding is notable. Despite challenges in integrating Cloudflare Access with existing VPNs and the need for better automation and support, it remains vital for DNS and infrastructure protection.

What features make Cloudflare One stand out?

Rate Limiting: Controls the traffic rate to prevent abuse.
DDoS Protection: Shields applications from distributed denial-of-service attacks.
Secure Web Gateway: Provides secure internet access with seamless operation.
Zero Trust Network Access: Ensures secure, application-based connectivity without relying on traditional VPNs.
Access for Connectivity: Facilitates access to internal applications securely.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security: Robust measures for DNS and browsing protection.
Performance: Enhanced site accessibility and communication speed.
Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing for its features.
Ease of Deployment: Straightforward and efficient setup process.

In industries like finance, retail, and technology, Cloudflare One is crucial for enabling secure remote access and protecting web applications against dynamic threats. It supports compliance access policies and enhances content delivery, playing a key role in safeguarding digital infrastructure.

Cloudflare

GTB Technologies Inspector offers a single agent solution for data loss prevention and classification, supporting multiple platforms. Users find it lightweight and effective for real-time protection and encryption, making it suitable for managing sensitive data and preventing data leakage.

GTB Technologies Inspector integrates data classification and leakage prevention in a unified platform, functioning as a Cloud Access Security Broker and firewall. Supporting platforms like Google Cloud and Azure, it monitors sensitive data between departments and third parties, protecting confidential documents and Microsoft 365 from network and endpoint threats. Its centralized console facilitates deployment and monitoring across networks and endpoints. While recognized for its ease of deployment and real-time protection, improvements in processing time, performance, analytics, and support processes are desired. Users seek enhanced information rights management, AI capabilities, and mobile endpoint security with better database security and functionality.

What are the key features?

Single Agent: Integrates DLP and data classification into one solution.
OCR: Offers optical character recognition without extra licensing fees.
Fingerprinting: Includes data fingerprinting for preemptive protection.
Real-Time Protection: Encrypts and decrypts data instantaneously.
Centralized Console: Manages deployments and settings from one location.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Effective Management: Ensures efficient handling of sensitive data across platforms.
Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup and integration processes.
Customization Options: Adapts to industry-specific needs and changes.
Network and Endpoint Protection: Offers robust security for multiple environments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, GTB Technologies Inspector addresses unique data security concerns, facilitating data classification and regulatory compliance. It efficiently manages cloud access and enforces security policies, safeguarding data shared with third parties. As organizations expand digitally, it provides essential leakage prevention mechanisms, maintaining data integrity without compromising operational efficiency.

GTB Technologies

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention helps businesses protect sensitive data through robust compliance automation and seamless multi-platform integration, supporting environments like Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, and macOS.

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention focuses on identifying sensitive data and maintaining compliance through automation and integration with platforms such as Exchange email, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. Auto-labeling, classification controls, and monitoring capabilities ensure secure data management, reducing insider threat response times by 25%. While praised for its capabilities, improvements in system integration, endpoint handling, and incident management are needed. Licensing costs and limited language support pose challenges. Usability can be enhanced through interface updates and better documentation. OCR and scalability enhancements could improve policy propagation speed. More end-user training examples would be beneficial.

What are the key features?

Sensitive Data Identification: Detects confidential information across environments.
Compliance Automation: Streamlines regulatory requirements adherence.
Multi-Platform Integration: Supports Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, macOS seamlessly.
Auto-Labeling: Automatically categorizes sensitive data for protection.
Classification Controls: Provides robust data classification options.
Alerts and Monitoring: Enhances data security with proactive alerting.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Efficient Threat Response: Reduces insider threat response times by 25%.
Enhanced Data Governance: Simplifies managing data privacy and compliance.
Comprehensive Protection: Integrates with multiple platforms for wide coverage.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and legal, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is crucial for safeguarding sensitive information due to strict compliance demands. It automates data classification and policy configurations, preventing accidental data leakage and ensuring security protocols align with regulatory standards.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

23andMe

Supya Security Software

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

April 2026

Free Report: GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.