HPE Zerto Software vs OpenText Migrate comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and OpenText are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.5% mindshare in CM, compared to OpenText’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 359 HPE Zerto Software reviews

24,233 Views
2,181 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

OpenText Migrate

Read 4 OpenText Migrate reviews

1,997 Views
1,278 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

OpenText Migrate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

HPE Zerto Software and OpenText Migrate compete in data management solutions, focusing on data protection and migration. HPE Zerto Software has the upper hand in real-time replication and disaster recovery, whereas OpenText Migrate offers better value in data migration.

Features: HPE Zerto Software provides continuous data protection, rapid recovery, and integrated disaster recovery systems. OpenText Migrate offers robust data migration features, seamless migration processes across diverse environments, and adaptability for complex migration projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Migrate is recognized for a straightforward deployment process and available support, while HPE Zerto Software emphasizes comprehensive service support with a focus on recovery and protection systems.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software requires a higher upfront setup investment, offset by potential substantial recovery-focused ROI, while OpenText Migrate offers a lower initial cost with a focus on long-term savings through efficient migrations.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. OpenText Migrate Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. OpenText Migrate

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Migration

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

359

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Backup (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (1st), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

OpenText Migrate

Ranking in Cloud Migration

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Migration Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 4.5%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Migrate is 4.4%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	4.5%
OpenText Migrate	4.4%
Other	91.1%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2802231

Dev Ops Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

Ludovik DOPIERALA

Manager, Service Line at ARTEMYS INVEST

Migration projects have become faster and have saved significant time on complex workloads

OpenText Migrate is our primary tool. I know they have a lot of other products like DNS and tools from cybersecurity, but we don't use it at this time. On Demand Recovery, for recovery, we use another tool from OpenText. It's C2C. It's a product to back up the mailbox. I don't know what I can find at this time. So maybe yes, but the last time I used it was a few months ago. It does the job, so I don't have an opinion on this currently. They don't have a lot of marketing actions. We know this product because we are an OpenText partner for the C2C. But it's another division. It's another part of the company. So we don't have a lot of information. So, I think they can improve the communication for the end-user because a lot of customers do not know OpenText, and they don't know they can provide this type of tool. My overall rating for this product is 9.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like most about Zerto is that it makes my job much easier. I have peace of mind knowing that it works. The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick."

"The main purpose of this tool is to allow failover between different data centers and different locations. When one site is unavailable, we can start the failover activity and perform the failover task. When a primary location is unavailable, or there is some hardware or logical issue at the primary location, it allows us to resolve the problem. We are able to start services at safe locations. We handle the disaster recovery process, and this is the main function for which we are using it all the time."

"We are moving to a new data center. There are several VMs that we have to move over there that have RDM disks or SQL clusters. Those are the hardest things to move at this point in time, but now that I have the setup and it is ready to go, all we have to do is just flip the switch and get everything over where they are supposed to be. It is going to be a lifesaver for me. It will save me a whole lot of time in putting things back together."

"I appreciate most that we can do quick failover tests without actually going to live failover, which is very helpful because we have to do SOC audits, and they want to see that we do test this. It is extremely easy to test to show whether or not these things boot up in a test environment, which they do."

"HPE Zerto Software is one of the best software solutions that I have used to date."

"Overall, with respect to ease of use, this product scores the highest points in this area."

"Zerto's continuous data protection is unmatched. It's phenomenal. It's also very easy to use. The menus are self-explanatory. Once you understand the terminology of the product, what the VPGs (Virtual Protected Groups) are, you're able to pretty much do what you want in the product. It's very easy to use."

"Zerto is one of the easiest disaster recovery products I've used."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"OpenText Migrate is a very good product because it is an older product and they have a lot of tools, and they have a lot of experience on the migration tools."

"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level."

"Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"It is a good third-party migration tool because it can be used with clients who have heterogeneous environments."

Cons

"Zerto can improve the dashboard by making it even more simple. Right now, there's a lot on the dashboard, and it can be overwhelming. If you're an experienced user, then you'll find it easy to use, but if you're a beginner, it will take you some time."

"Some of the cloud instructions around VNets and peering of networks could be clearer with some best-case examples."

"Zerto has not saved us time in a data recovery situation due to ransomware because we did not have it correctly configured."

"The biggest area for improvement is the technical support side. Although it has improved somewhat, after the HPE acquisition, it became apparent that level-one technical support was moved to groups unfamiliar with the Zerto product."

"Physical servers would be a nice enhancement. I would also like to see the backup portion really enhanced further."

"It needs to support more public cloud, especially in China."

"Zerto could improve its reporting capabilities."

"The improvement that I would like to see is a little bit easier product knowledge, things like that."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"

"If we had to move 100 applications across a multi-cloud environment, then this solution would not work."

"Carbonite failed when moving GIS data."

"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration."

"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved."

"The pricing for the customer is always too expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'd like to see better tiering for Zerto's pricing. We do multi-tier VMs. I don't think I should be paying a penalty and price for a tier-three VM where I don't need a really tight SLA like I do for a tier-one."

"I am not very involved with the pricing, but from my understanding, it is fairly expensive for us. This is why we limit its use to our tier-one customers. We have other disaster recovery solutions for our other customers due to the cost."

"If you are an IT person and you think that DR is too expensive then the cloud option from Zerto is good because anyone can afford to use it, as far as getting one or two of their criticals protected."

"It's expensive, for sure, but for us, it comes down to the fact that we do not replicate our entire environment using Zerto. We replicate the mission-critical servers and services, so the yearly cost of Zerto is heavily outweighed by the potential cost of an outage."

"The pricing seems really good. We're an enterprise customer, so we get all the bells and whistles."

"The only negative part that I have seen so far has been the cost. It is kind of pricey, but you get what you pay for. Zerto is a lot faster than other solutions and you get enhanced performance."

"It's a little bit expensive."

"My understanding is that it's expensive but worth the price."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

"In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."

"The licensing costs are really high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Construction Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	94
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	206

No data available

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

HPE Zerto Software's GUI needs modernization to match the flexibility and user experience of other HPE software solutions, as there is still room for improvement in software-level flexibility and t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Carbonite Migrate?

Carbonite was not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Carbonite Migrate?

C2C is OpenText. It's Carbonite. It was a backup for the mailbox and Teams, OneDrive, SharePoint, or similar applications. We don't use it. The only tools that we use to encrypt data are the legacy...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Carbonite Migrate?

I use this project because I work for an IT company in France and we perform a lot of migration work, and we often use OpenText Migrate. We perform a lot of migration of Microsoft Active Directory,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Rivery vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 13% of the time

AWS Migration Hub vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 12% of the time

Nutanix Move vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Zero Downtime Migration vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 9% of the time

Tervela Cloud FastPath vs OpenText Migrate

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Migrate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

July 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Migrate

July 2026

Download OpenText Migrate product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

No data available

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

OpenText Migrate provides a robust and efficient way to transition workloads and applications across different environments, ensuring business continuity and seamless operation in complex IT infrastructures.

OpenText Migrate simplifies the process of moving servers and applications, offering an adaptable and efficient platform that minimizes downtime and maintains data integrity during transfers. It caters to varied migrations, whether on-premise, between data centers, or to cloud environments, supporting the rapid pacing of digital transformation.

What are the key features of OpenText Migrate?

Automated Workflows: Streamline migrations with automated processes, reducing manual intervention.
Scalability: Handle large-scale migrations with the ability to scale operations to meet demand.
Data Security: Maintain security protocols to ensure data integrity throughout the migration.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Facilitate migration across different OS and hardware configurations.
Monitoring and Reporting: Gain real-time insights and detailed reports to track migration progress.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Downtime: Achieve minimal service interruption, ensuring business continuity.
Cost Efficiency: Decrease expenses associated with manual migration efforts and errors.
Improved Performance: Benefit from optimized workloads that enhance operational efficiencies.
Enhanced Security: Protect sensitive data during the migration process, maintaining compliance.

OpenText Migrate implementations are versatile, adept at supporting industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing where IT resilience is critical. Its ability to accommodate diverse migration needs allows sectors to maintain productivity and enhance performance with minimal disruption.

OpenText

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Computrade Malaysia

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. OpenText Migrate

August 2026

Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. OpenText Migrate

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. OpenText Migrate and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Zerto Software vs. OpenText Migrate report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.