HPE Zerto Software vs Vision Solutions Double-Take comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and IBM are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.1, while IBM is ranked #31. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 5.6% mindshare in DRS, compared to IBM’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 365 HPE Zerto Software reviews

28,672 Views
12,902 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Read 4 Vision Solutions Double-Take reviews

2,926 Views
1,492 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Vision Solutions Double-Take and HPE Zerto Software are competing in the data protection and disaster recovery market. HPE Zerto Software appears to have the upper hand with its advanced features, although Vision Solutions Double-Take is more competitively priced.

Features: Vision Solutions Double-Take offers real-time byte-level replication, full server migration, and SQL migrations. HPE Zerto Software provides analytical and reporting monitoring, ransomware protection, and orchestration for automated failover.

Room for Improvement: Vision Solutions Double-Take could improve by enhancing its analytical capabilities, offering more robust ransomware protection, and expanding its orchestration features. HPE Zerto Software may benefit from simplifying deployment, better supporting Hyper-V environments, and broadening its analytical feature set to compete with external analytics tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Vision Solutions Double-Take is straightforward to deploy with comprehensive support, making it appealing for easy implementation needs. HPE Zerto Software, despite its complexity, provides thorough documentation and support which is ideal for detailed setup guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Vision Solutions Double-Take offers a cost-effective setup with quicker ROI, suited for organizations with tight budgets. In contrast, HPE Zerto Software, although requiring a higher initial investment, provides potential long-term value through its robust feature set, making it attractive for enterprises focusing on comprehensive disaster recovery needs.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

365

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Vision Solutions Double-Take

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

31st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 5.6%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vision Solutions Double-Take is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	5.6%
Vision Solutions Double-Take	1.8%
Other	92.6%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

Aslah Faseel K

DevOps Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

it_user710520

Migration Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way

Full server migration possibility and SQL migrations It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way. Linux compatibility SQL migrations GUI For over a year. Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"DR has enough problems to deal with and Zerto makes things a lot easier."

"The solution is really good and I am super happy with Zerto."

"If you are a numbers person, the benefit far outweighs the cost from any other competing software or service provider."

"We've seen a massive benefit from using Zerto in terms of time savings and consistency. You see a consistent outcome every time you do the conversions. We're moving from one platform to another, but the payloads in what we're moving are different. We see consistent delivery."

"Continuous protection is Zerto's most valuable aspect."

"The most valuable features are the single pane of glass and the reduction in time it takes for our systems engineering team to manage the platform."

"The replication works really well. We perform multiple tests a month and annual tests for our tier-one and many of our tier-two apps... Migrating systems as a failover rollback or a system move are two of the functions that I like the most."

"Zerto saved us a lot of money compared to the cost of replicating at the LUN level. It also really simplified it and gave us shorter RTOs and RPOs."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"It gives us the possibility to migrate/protect customer servers and data in the simplest way."

"Customer Service: Second to none Technical Support: Second to none"

"In Version 7.xx the most valuable feature to me is being able to carry out a test full server failover in which case the primary server is still up and running."

"It takes less time to replicate files between two servers."

Cons

"The only issue that I observed was that depending on the number of virtual machines that are being replicated, you will have to provision the appropriate bandwidth for the link that the replicated systems will traverse."

"Its initial setup can be better. It looks easy, but if you do not have things in the right place, it is not as easy as it looks. Some of the instructions were not clear. They were a little bit confusing. For example, while setting up SSH initially, it was a little bit unclear if I needed to use a regular credential or some other credential. This was one of the things that was a little fuzzy, and we had to get somebody else involved to help us out."

"Zerto's connectivity with automation platforms could be improved. For example, vCenter can use a VMware-developed tool called Site Recovery Manager. That can be integrated with automation platforms such as Terraform, Ansible, Chef, or Puppet, to perform automated, self-sufficient recoveries to essentially avoid any downtime. To my knowledge, Zerto does not have integration with those platforms."

"The biggest area for improvement is the technical support side. Although it has improved somewhat, after the HPE acquisition, it became apparent that level-one technical support was moved to groups unfamiliar with the Zerto product."

"I would like to see different reporting options than what is currently available. I would like to be able to grab different data points that do not currently exist in the reporting system."

"It was a little bit expensive."

"If anything, a lower price is always better."

"The tech support on my latest issue wasn't so great. I had to figure a lot of stuff out myself. It could be that I had a Level 1 tech who was new or something, but it seemed like the tech was spitballing, which does not help me."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"Yes I encountered issues with deployment. The information provided in the guide just stated about 2 or 3 communication ports but even after these ports are enabled there are still issues with the 2 servers communicating via Double-Take."

"Not such a good coverage of the most widely used Linux server distributions, so many issues happen while migrating these servers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Zerto previously had a perplexing licensing structure, but they have since resolved it by implementing a unified license."

"The solution is expensive, but it's worth the price."

"I wish it were cheaper, but I would purchase it again at the same price."

"Its price is reasonable. I have not worked with other tools, but as compared to its competitors such as VMware, its price is lower. So, in my opinion, its price is good."

"I think the cost is reasonable for VM licensing. It's not outside the scope of an enterprise product."

"The pricing is good. It's affordable."

"To ensure proper data protection, we require a separate backup solution alongside Zerto for disaster recovery therefore the price for Zerto is high."

"You are getting what you pay for, as this is a solution that requires minimal management after it is configured."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	97
Midsize Enterprise	94
Large Enterprise	210

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

I find HPE Zerto Software affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

I would like HPE Zerto Software to support more hypervisor platforms than currently available. Support for additional hypervisors could be added in the future. Since we have multiple platforms, we ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 7% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 2% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Dell RecoverPoint vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp SnapMirror vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Softek TDMF vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 5% of the time

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Vision Solutions Double-Take

Compared 5% of the time

More Vision Solutions Double-Take Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

October 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

October 2026

Download Vision Solutions Double-Take product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

Double-Take, DoubleTake

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Vision Solutions Double-Take provides robust data protection and migration services tailored for complex IT environments, ensuring seamless business continuity across platforms. This solution is ideal for businesses requiring high availability and disaster recovery.

Vision Solutions Double-Take offers a reliable framework for managing data replication, providing enterprises with functionality that maintains data integrity and minimizes downtime. Designed to support critical workloads, it facilitates smooth data transitioning and enhanced operability through virtual and physical server replication. Organizations benefit from the scalable architecture, allowing adjustments to meet evolving IT requirements confidently.

What are the valuable features of Vision Solutions Double-Take?

Real-Time Replication: Ensures constantly updated data by mirroring changes instantly.
Virtualization Support: Compatible with physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures for flexible deployment.
Automated Failover: Seamlessly redirects resources to backup systems during failures.
Data Compression: Reduces bandwidth usage by efficiently compressing replicated data.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Reduced Downtime: Minimizing disruptions ensures continuous business operations.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases storage expenses by utilizing existing infrastructure efficiently.
Scalability: Easily adapts to the growing demands of IT environments.

In healthcare, Vision Solutions Double-Take supports critical data availability, while in finance, it ensures compliance and protection of sensitive information. Retail sectors benefit from minimal interruption in service, facilitating uninterrupted point-of-sale transactions.

IBM

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

ABC Fine Wine & Spirits, Accessor Capital Management, Adventist Health, Alfa Bank, Alphawest Services, Ameristar Casinos, Ambrian Capital PLC

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

September 2026

Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Zerto Software vs. Vision Solutions Double-Take report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.