IBM OpenPages vs MetricStream comparison

Read 6 MetricStream reviews

2,935 Views
2,465 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

IBM OpenPages

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

MetricStream and IBM OpenPages are competing products in risk and compliance management. IBM OpenPages generally offers superior features, making it a more comprehensive choice, though MetricStream is noted for its competitive pricing and support services.

Features: MetricStream provides robust risk management and compliance solutions with a comprehensive reporting system and effective enterprise risk tracking. IBM OpenPages offers advanced analytics, extensive configurability, and integration options, allowing for detailed insights and a customizable user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MetricStream presents a straightforward deployment model with reliable customer service, aiding quick adoption. IBM OpenPages provides a flexible deployment framework and exceptional support, offering more tailored solutions, although it may be slightly more complex to deploy.

Pricing and ROI: MetricStream is noted for its cost-effectiveness, providing a lower initial setup cost and faster returns on investment. IBM OpenPages demands a higher initial investment but offers substantial long-term value through its comprehensive functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM OpenPages vs. MetricStream Report (Updated: April 2026).

IBM OpenPages vs. MetricStream

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM OpenPages

Ranking in GRC

7th

Ranking in IT Governance

4th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MetricStream

Ranking in GRC

8th

Ranking in IT Governance

5th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Controls Monitoring (4th), IT Vendor Risk Management (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the GRC category, the mindshare of IBM OpenPages is 2.2%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MetricStream is 2.9%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM OpenPages	2.2%
MetricStream	2.9%
Other	94.9%

GRC

Featured Reviews

Gabriele Meneguzzi

GRC Practice Leader at Stratos Analytics

Have improved operational control and simplified internal workflows through a clear user interface

The most useful features in IBM OpenPages are the workflow features and front-end. The workflow feature in IBM OpenPages is very flexible, easy to configure, and can help design every kind of process, while the front-end is very useful, clear, simple, and dynamic. The benefit of a centralized platform in risk management, such as IBM OpenPages, is that it allows sharing information and guarantees a central framework of risk and control. The dashboards in IBM OpenPages help with monitoring processes for different users and profiles, and we use the dashboard extensively to show the state of different processes to control them. IBM OpenPages integrates effectively with other tools and existing infrastructure for my customers as we integrate other tools, using APIs to match different information, though some other tools may better support integration. IBM offers Connect, an add-on for integration, but we do not use it, relying solely on API. The reporting tools in IBM OpenPages have very strong potential because they are linked with Cognos IBM, a business intelligence tool, allowing for very good and complex reports, though creating these reports requires skills in business intelligence to get the most out of IBM OpenPages.

Read full review

reviewer2860572

Business Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized compliance workflows have improved audit readiness but still need better UX and analytics

Since I have used MetricStream for the last three years, one of the top improvements that comes to my mind is enhanced user experience and UX/UI. I believe that while MetricStream is highly configurable, some workflows can feel really complex for occasional users or first-time users, and I do not find the existing UI/UX experience very intuitive. A more intuitive interface with simplified navigation and role-based dashboards could reduce training time and improve user adoption for both first-time and occasional users. Additionally, MetricStream could include advanced analytics and AI capabilities. More AI-driven insights using predictive risk analysis and intelligent recommendations could help organizations identify compliance gaps before they become audit findings. Furthermore, simplified configuration and integration could be beneficial; configuring workflows, forms, and integrations currently requires a lot of specialized expertise. Low-code or no-code enhancements and easier integration with enterprise systems such as SharePoint, ServiceNow, SAP, or Azure DevOps could reduce implementation effort and operational time. The reporting needs enhancement, perhaps by including role-based reporting and simplifying the dashboard, which currently has too much information and can overwhelm first-time or occasional users. It would be better to show only what is necessary or introduce configurations to display what each user wants to see on their dashboard. MetricStream could definitely improve its accuracy and reliability of output. It could provide more curated, personalized recommendations instead of generic suggestions. Additionally, MetricStream could develop recommendations that align with role-based dashboards instead of providing uniform recommendations across the board.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything about IBM OpenPages is valuable, particularly when compared to other solutions in the market like MetricStream, from which we switched due to its feasibility, user-friendliness, and performance."

"Good in ORM and compliance, analytics, custom reporting, features for our board including risk management, and good support for Basel regulations."

"The most valuable features are the workflow engine, calculations, and security rules."

"IBM OpenPages provides time savings in recording risk management components."

"The most useful features in IBM OpenPages are the workflow features and front-end, as noted by Ian Francis, an IBM expert lab, with the workflow feature being very flexible, easy to configure, and able to help design every kind of process, while the front-end is very useful, clear, simple, and dynamic."

"With OpenPages, the risks and controls are registered and monitored continuously."

"The content, reporting, and workflow features stand out as the most valuable aspects."

"The ability to keep a record of internal incidents in the company, and also the monitoring of Key Indicators."

More IBM OpenPages pros

"For our client, MetricStream made the audits incredibly efficient, and in real time, I could provide the status of the audit to stakeholders, indicating which controls had deviations, which control was pending, and who it was pending on."

"MetricStream is something like an all-in-one solution where I do not need to write scripts or conduct audits."

"Key features are usability and ease of configuration, and it allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."

"It has good features and good functionality, and our customers feel there is a lot of merit in that."

"Since implementing MetricStream, audit teams have shaved about two weeks off of annual planning across various teams, allowing audit departments of about 140 auditors across maybe 10 teams to squeeze in 10 extra audits, one audit per each team, if not additional testing."

"The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."

Cons

"The reporting tools in IBM OpenPages have very strong potential because they are linked with Cognos IBM, a business intelligence tool, allowing for very good and complex reports, though creating these reports requires skills in business intelligence to get the most out of IBM OpenPages."

"It would be useful to have more out-of-the-box functionality, especially triggers and calculations."

"IBM OpenPages needs improvement in its UI. Currently, it is difficult to see the relationships (associations/parents) between all items unless you click on the item itself."

"IBM needs to work on pricing for organizations with around 100 users, as the licensing model is not competitive enough for SMEs."

"IBM OpenPages could improve by adding more conditions to workflows, as some existing conditions might not work and can produce errors."

"Some self-relationships are not available in OpenPages' relationship model."

"Pricing! It's very expensive just for the licenses."

"I believe there's room for improvement in establishing connections with external information."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."

"MetricStream at that point did not have a template, and I had to build the entire SOX 404 IT general controls testing framework myself."

"The support part is terrible, rating about one out of ten."

"Since I have used MetricStream for the last three years, one of the top improvements that comes to my mind is enhanced user experience and UX/UI."

"MetricStream's scalability is adaptable, though the biggest issue I have encountered with clients has been around upgrades that require re-implementing customizations to the out-of-box solutions after significant upgrades."

"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"They are flexible in terms of customers' needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Healthcare Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM OpenPages?

There is nothing in particular that needs improvement in IBM OpenPages, although reporting could be improved to make it easier to create reports.

What is your primary use case for IBM OpenPages?

My customers' main use cases for IBM OpenPages include ICT risk, operational risk management, and regulatory and compliance management.

What advice do you have for others considering IBM OpenPages?

For those planning to use IBM OpenPages, I recommend defining exactly what you want and understanding how IBM OpenPages can help you before starting to use it. I rate IBM OpenPages a nine out of ten.

What needs improvement with MetricStream?

MetricStream can be improved in the area of developers. There are two parts of developers: those who prepare solutions for clients and those from India who support the application. The support part...

What is your primary use case for MetricStream?

My main use case for MetricStream was that I was a developer and I prepared templates for a client while also testing the UI platform for the client. I can give a specific example of a template I p...

What advice do you have for others considering MetricStream?

The advice I would give to others looking into using MetricStream is to not use MetricStream. I would rate this recommendation a four out of ten.

RSA Archer vs IBM OpenPages

Comparisons

Compared 17% of the time

ConvergePoint Policy Management Software vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 5% of the time

ACL Analytics vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 4% of the time

Formalize vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 4% of the time

ARIS Risk and Compliance Manager vs IBM OpenPages

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM OpenPages Competitors

RSA Archer vs MetricStream

Compared 13% of the time

AuditBoard vs MetricStream

Compared 7% of the time

Mitratech Prevalent vs MetricStream

Compared 5% of the time

Nasdaq BWise vs MetricStream

Compared 5% of the time

Resolver GRC Suite vs MetricStream

Compared 5% of the time

More MetricStream Competitors

Product Reports

Download IBM OpenPages product report

GRC

May 2026

Download MetricStream product report

June 2026

Also Known As

OpenPages

No data available

Overview

IBM OpenPages provides a robust platform for reporting, content management, and workflows. Its integration with Cognos supports advanced reporting alongside enhanced risk management, compliance, and workflow capabilities catering to complex operational needs.

IBM OpenPages stands out as a comprehensive platform that integrates rich reporting and risk management features. Cognos integration allows access to standard reports, charts, and dashboards, enhancing analytic capabilities. Valuable functionalities include compliance support, workflow flexibility, and a user-centric front-end experience. Its centralized risk management framework and effective information-sharing capabilities make it highly reliable. Strong data extraction and API integrations further its utility, particularly appreciated in industries for operational risk management and policy enforcement. However, areas such as integration with external data systems, navigation improvements, and more competitive pricing for smaller enterprises offer scope for enhancement.

What are the key features of IBM OpenPages?

Reporting: Offers insightful standard reports, charts, and dashboards.
Risk Management: Centralized framework for effective risk sharing.
Content Management: Integrates with workflows for comprehensive management.
Compliance Support: Robust functionalities that support compliance needs.
Workflow Flexibility: Adaptable workflows catering to varied needs.
User-Friendly Front-End: Designed for ease of use and effectiveness.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Centralized Risk Management: Effective sharing and management of risk information.
Robust Data Extraction: Enhanced data handling through strong extraction capabilities.
API Integrations: Supports diverse functionalities through API connections.
Performance: Often outperforming alternatives like MetricStream.
Operational Utility: Widely used for operational risk management.

IBM OpenPages is predominantly used in financial services to manage risks related to operations, IT, ESG, data privacy, compliance, and audits. Its capabilities in scenario planning, reporting, dashboards, and IT governance support users across different sectors in effective control management, risk assessments, and workflows, backed by integrated tools and document management features.

IBM

MetricStream is a cloud-based platform providing robust audit, compliance, and risk management tools. Users enjoy features like mobile interfaces and centralized risk libraries, though some report interface flow issues and technical support challenges.

MetricStream stands out for its audit, risk, and compliance capabilities, delivering customizable and standardized risk management across departments. Its comprehensive dashboards and reporting tools streamline compliance processes, reducing planning time and breaking down silos. Though described as a pricier option, it efficiently integrates risk elements and supports users with mobile interfaces and cloud availability. Areas for improvement include enhancing security integration, improving interface flow, and boosting support services, particularly from India.

What features does MetricStream offer?

Mobile-Friendly Interfaces: Provides easy access to risk and compliance tools on mobile devices.
Cloud Availability: Ensures scalability and data accessibility across regions.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Offers detailed insights for compliance and audit processes.
Centralized Risk Libraries: Facilitates standardized risk management across departments.
Robust Reporting Tools: Enhances governance with detailed reports and analytics.

What benefits can users find in MetricStream reviews?

Reduces Silos: Streamlines processes and improves communication across departments.
Saves Planning Time: Offers efficient audit process management and compliance adherence.
Efficient Integration: Combines risk elements effectively for comprehensive governance.

System integrators utilize MetricStream in audit and risk management, focusing on template preparation and UI testing. They assemble components like Lego pieces, but face challenges with larger solutions requiring developer participation for code alterations. Initial implementation is often delayed by India-based technical support, impacting operations. Enterprise and Operations Risk Management are commonly employed with MetricStream, highlighting its industry relevance.

Sample Customers

Nationwide, Process Innovation AG, OSRAM Licht AG, Dep‹sito Central de Valores (DCV), Delta Lloyd Group, Unum

Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, ACCO Brands Corporation, AgFirst Farm Credit Bank, AIB International, Associated Banc-Corp, BAE Systems, Barclaycard, Dell Inc, DIRECTV, Energizer, Fresenius Kabi, Hasbro, Goodyear, HudsonCity Savings Bank, Infigen Energy, Kaydon, Leroy Merlin, Mountry Financial Corp., Nicholas Piramal, Pepco, Pfizer, Societe Generale, Whitney Bank