IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs ScienceLogic comparison

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,067 Views
529 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and ScienceLogic compete in the IT operations management domain. ScienceLogic appears to have the upper hand with advanced features, though IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus may provide competitive pricing and support options.

Features: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus offers high complexity event correlation, robust automation, and supports legacy protocols like CORBA. ScienceLogic excels with hybrid cloud monitoring, dynamic discovery, and strong analytics.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus could enhance user-friendliness, simplify integration of modern protocols, and reduce setup complexity. ScienceLogic could improve customization options, expand application monitoring, and better integrate with non-standard systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a simplified deployment model and top-notch customer support, facilitating smooth implementation. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus involves a more intricate setup due to complexity but offers reliable support for any challenges.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus demands higher upfront setup costs, potentially offering favorable ROI in large-scale environments. ScienceLogic presents more competitive pricing and quicker ROI, appealing to those focusing on cloud and hybrid solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: July 2025).

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. ScienceLogic

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Ranking in Event Monitoring

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Event Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (25th), Server Monitoring (12th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (20th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (16th), AIOps (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is 10.2%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 7.3%, up from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Aids in network performance monitoring and management

I am working as a customer, mainly using IntelliQ and another product, IBM NetCool, Watson AI. These products are used for monitoring network performance and management. The primary use case involves network performance monitoring, and it is compatible only with IBM DB2 IBM Tivoli NetCool…

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Probes are the best feature because they are well written which rarely requires you to write additional rules. These probes monitor activity within your environment."

"It is customer-centric. Customers can access the event list from their location or desktop and view the event. There is no need to go and connect to any other server and run events to have a view of all the events happening in the environment. We get a good response from customers about this feature and the main architecture of NetCool. Its processing is very good. Deduplication and correlation functionalities are good in this solution as compared to other solutions. A big advantage of NetCool is that it also supports multi-layered protocols. We can receive multiple events from different protocols like UDP, HTTP, and those events can be captured in NetCool."

"The monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

"OMNIbus is valuable for its compatibility and performance, as I haven't encountered any performance issues."

"The most valuable feature is the event management capability."

"Offers very good event/alert drill-down and statistical reporting capabilities."

"The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform."

"IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus supports legacy protocols like CORBA, Huawei, and other telecom protocols, which I find beneficial."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus pros

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"Since it is a SaaS-based product, the setup is not very difficult."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"The power flow is great."

"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"There should be an easier-to-understand model, more of a flat-structured model rather than different tiers of licenses which complicates licensing."

"The solution has limitations in database integration as it cannot integrate with databases other than IBM DB2."

"Areas that could be better include the fact that the solution is only on-premises, lacks AI capabilities, and support response times could be quicker."

"Its integration could be better. They should provide an easier integration for all the monitoring stuff, and it will make things easier for us. Currently, there is a complexity in integrating it with a vendor application, and we have to use another tool to integrate it with a vendor application. To integrate some applications with NetCool, I need to install an IBM tool on top of it. It would be good if they can provide an API or any kind of interface that we can leverage while developing a new protocol interface or application. We should be able to use an API or interface with NetCool. Its GUI can also be better. As compared to other tools, it is not user friendly, and it is not easy to do stuff through GUI. Whenever we do anything on the GUI, it takes time. They need to focus on the GUI part, especially the dashboard. They should focus on how users can effectively drill down from one box to another. The visual appeal of the dashboard is as important as the data and functionality."

"The web portal and typical event controls are a little outdated."

"The cost of the product is quite high. They should work to adjust their pricing models."

"They could enhance the visibility to give us a unified view of our entire IT infrastructure."

"Its technical support team takes longer to reply."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus cons

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

"The product's reporting functionalities have certain shortcomings, making it an area where improvements are required."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"They need a little more self-service."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a costly solution."

"Its license cost is a little bit more than other solutions. Our customers expect a standard market price that is comparative to other products. For each and every NetCool OMNIbus component, we have to purchase a separate license. These components are not free with the product."

"You have to have the right level of budget to afford this solution."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

I would rate the pricing for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus as three, where one is a high price and ten is a low price.

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

Based on my experience and my colleagues' feedback, IBM can improve IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus in automation with respect to using AI, as it lacks considerably compared to other tools. The integrat...

What is your primary use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

My current use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is for monitoring the networks.

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support t...

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Comparisons

Compared 27% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 14% of the time

SCOM vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 11% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 9% of the time

BigPanda vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

August 2025

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

July 2025

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

No data available

Overview

Tivoli Netcool OMNIbus provides near real-time service assurance for business infrastructure, applications, servers, network devices and protocols, Internet protocols, storage and security devices.

IBM

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Consolidated Communications, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Capgemini

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell