IBM WebSphere Application Server vs WebLogic Suite comparison

IBM and Oracle are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 11.2% mindshare in AIS, compared to Oracle’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

IBM WebSphere Application S...

Read 31 IBM WebSphere Application Server reviews

3,957 Views
1,741 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

WebLogic Suite

Read 35 WebLogic Suite reviews

738 Views
657 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere Application S...

WebLogic Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

WebLogic Suite and IBM WebSphere are competing in the application server market. WebLogic Suite may have the upper hand with better integration with Oracle products, while WebSphere boasts broader support for diverse enterprise environments.

Features: WebLogic Suite is known for its cluster configuration and performance, providing robust application support and efficient deployment processes. It excels in middleware applications with seamless Oracle product integration. IBM WebSphere stands out for its stability and configurability, offering excellent connectivity with legacy systems and enterprise-level integration.

Room for Improvement: WebLogic Suite could improve transaction monitoring graphics, multi-tenancy functionality, and cloud integration. Enhancing API support and simplifying its complexity would be beneficial. WebSphere needs better support for modern technologies, a simpler licensing model, and more intuitive interfaces. Reducing hardware requirements would enhance its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both WebLogic Suite and WebSphere support on-premises and cloud deployments. WebLogic Suite offers comprehensive features but requires skilled management, while customer service can be costly. WebSphere provides intricate deployment capabilities, and customer service may benefit from a streamlined approach.

Pricing and ROI: WebLogic Suite is considered expensive, with careful forecasting needed to maximize its potential high returns. IBM WebSphere also involves high costs, yet offers discounts to mitigate expenses. WebLogic's rapid integration with Oracle products suggests a potentially higher ROI, while WebSphere's pricing might restrict smaller organizations despite its broad capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. WebLogic Suite Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. WebLogic Suite

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere Application S...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Server (4th)

WebLogic Suite

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere Application Server is 11.2%, up from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WebLogic Suite is 3.5%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

BharathirajaSukumar

Senior Lead Analyst at Radial

Efficient load balancing and the clustering, achieved by using the deployment manager, is valuable

I believe that the system is already good. However, for improvement or enhancement, it is user-friendly, but it could offer better choices on the front end for different aspects or options. Sometimes, I have to search extensively for features, as there are no upfront tabs. There is a lack of visible, easy, user-friendly, and straightforward options for the number of features.

Read full review

Mari Pandian

Business Head - Enterprise Solutions at ImageGrafix Software FZCO

Coding flexibility with good integration but users need coding knowledge

We are an Oracle partner and work with many Oracle applications for integration purposes. WebLogic is used for integrating various Oracle applications and third-party services WebLogic allows us to do the coding as per the customer's requirements. It helps us meet their needs by integrating their…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable features might be the stability of the IBM WebSphere Application Server."

"IBM WebSphere Application Server is the best in terms of scalability and performance, as well as the support for managing distributed transactions."

"Network Deployment is the most useful feature for scalability. It has many features within the standard WebSphere Application Server edition."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is Portal Virtualization."

"Ease of administration: It has an Integrated Solutions Console, what we call the administrative console, with very detailed configurations and Help pages for each configurable item."

"IBM WAS is the backbone for our enterprise content management suite which delivers the primary processes for our customers. Without a good application server, it would be hard to provide a secure layer of midddleware upon which the other applications run. IBM WAS improves the stability of the entire solution and provides a high quality platform for running web-based solutions."

"The most valuable features are its user-friendliness and reliability in terms of application hosting."

"The integration between IBM tools and applications is very well executed, and the support from IBM is quite good, providing a solid support structure."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pros

"The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution."

"The most valuable feature of WebLogic is it has excellent performance and stability compared to the previous solution we used."

"The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment."

"Robust solution; console and enterprise management tools are really easy to work."

"The transaction handling of WebLogic and the way it is designed is excellent."

"It integrates various applications easily, provided there is a coder available."

"What I've been seeing as the most valuable characteristics of WebLogic Suite include robustness and scalability. It's a really good solution, and I'm not saying this because my company is a partner of WebLogic Suite. I also like that with the newer versions of the solution, you can deploy WebLogic Suite faster. Oracle also provides excellent technical support."

"WebLogic Suite provides a stable application server experience."

More WebLogic Suite pros

Cons

"The business logic side of it is sort of missing in the sense that if I want to track and measure velocity, it is not really available. You have to buy another application and embark on a separate implementation. Instead of having different licensing, IBM DataPower should be integrated with WebSphere. It will allow us to build the business layer and rules a lot more efficiently, rather than developing rules within the application. It would be good if we can set up the business layer through parametrization rather than development. IBM DataPower has the business rule and the controls, and if it can be integrated, it would be fantastic. It will help the application in working better in terms of security features and business logic. If you're going to use it for open banking, you will be able to monitor velocity on the total pricing."

"IBM needs to pay attention to market changes more quickly. We now have Java 9 and very soon Java EE8. We do not want to wait for two or three years after their release until they are supported by the new version."

"I find the server okay, however, using the Maker instance, the Moving instance, and the Change instance is a little bit complicated without WebSphere knowledge."

"Some things are very difficult to do, so the interface and usage could be more intuitive for those."

"While WebSphere mostly supports IBM HTTP Server (IHS) as the web server plugin, I think it would be beneficial if it also supported Apache and NGINX web servers. That would give customers more flexibility in their choices."

"WebSphere is very cumbersome and not user-friendly. It used to have its own JVM, which presented challenges such as different architecture and memory leaks."

"The solution could improve the integration."

"WebSphere Application Server doesn't have an automated deployment option, forcing us to use third-party tools like Jenkins UCD and Palo Automated Deployment."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server cons

"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better."

"There are sometimes issues with clusters."

"I would like to see the licensing policy simplified."

"WebLogic requires a person with coding knowledge for easy configuration and quick integrations."

"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."

"For access management, WebLogic Suite is a heavy application. This application requires more time for installation compared to other products."

"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."

"This solution doesn't have connectors to other external applications."

More WebLogic Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If your application is just a web app that does not need to scale big, you can obtain a single core license of WAS Express edition, which has almost the same features with limited processing cores. If you manage a very big application farm (i.e. need to run 10 or more WAS servers) it is better to get IBM WAS Hypervisor Edition."

"The licensing policy is based on the PVU base."

"The price of IBM WebSphere Application Server could be less expensive and there is an annual license required for this solution."

"WebSphere Application Server is expensive, so it may not be a good option for small companies."

"It's expensive."

"It is very expensive."

"The price of this product is higher than that of competitors."

"The licensing cost is 1,000 of euros for a 30-year table."

More IBM WebSphere Application Server pricing and cost advice

"Technical support is very costly."

"There is a license required for this solution and the price could be reduced."

"The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support."

"Scaling is costly."

"The cost of the WebLogic Suite license is a bit high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM WebSphere Application Server?

Network Deployment is the most useful feature for scalability. It has many features within the standard WebSphere Application Server edition.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM WebSphere Application Server?

In Korea, when you buy IBM iOS, the WebSphere base version is included with iOS. That means no additional cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Application Server?

I find the server okay, however, using the Maker instance, the Moving instance, and the Change instance is a little bit complicated without WebSphere knowledge.

See all answers

What do you like most about WebLogic Suite?

The solution is useful for centralizing data.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WebLogic Suite?

WebLogic Suite is high-priced, akin to a Lamborghini. Its affordability suits enterprise-level organizations with digital footprints requiring robust financial resources.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WebLogic Suite?

One area for improvement in WebLogic Suite is the installation time. Otherwise, there are no other disadvantages, and they have good support from Oracle. The installation time can be an issue. It i...

See all answers

Comparisons

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 25% of the time

Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 22% of the time

Tomcat vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle WebLogic Server vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs IBM WebSphere Application Server

Compared 2% of the time

More IBM WebSphere Application Server Competitors

Oracle SOA Suite vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 54% of the time

Oracle WebCenter vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 15% of the time

Azul Zulu vs WebLogic Suite

Compared 14% of the time

More WebLogic Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Application Server

August 2025

Download IBM WebSphere Application Server product report

Buyer's Guide

WebLogic Suite

July 2025

Download WebLogic Suite product report

Also Known As

WebSphere Application Server

No data available

Overview

IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) is a middleware platform developed by IBM. It provides a range of services and tools to help organizations develop, deploy, and manage Java-based applications. WAS is part of IBM's WebSphere product family and provides a secure, scalable, and highly available platform for developing and running web-based applications. WAS provides a secure, scalable, and highly available platform, making it an attractive solution for organizations looking to develop and deploy enterprise-grade applications.

IBM WebSphere Application Server Features

IBM WebSphere Application Server has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Application deployment: IBM WAS enables organizations to deploy and manage applications in a secure and scalable environment.

Clustering: The clustering feature can help organizations ensure high availability and improve application performance.

Load balancing: The solution Includes load balancing capabilities to distribute application workloads and improve performance.

Security: IBM WAS offers a range of security features, including authentication, authorization, and encryption, to help organizations secure their applications and data.

Monitoring and management: The solution’s range of tools for monitoring and managing applications, including the IBM WebSphere Administrative Console allows organizations to optimize application performance and resolve issues easily.

Integration: IBM WAS integrates with a range of IBM and third-party products, including IBM WebSphere MQ, IBM DB2, and more, to provide a comprehensive platform for developing and running web-based applications.

IBM WebSphere Application Server Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing IBM WebSphere Application Server. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Improved application performance: The IBM WAS platform offers a scalable and secure platform for deploying and managing applications, enabling organizations to improve application performance and reduce downtime.

High availability: IBM WAS provides clustering and load-balancing capabilities to help organizations ensure high availability.

Improved security: With a large range of security features, including authentication, authorization, and encryption, the solution helps organizations secure their applications and data.

Simplified management: IBM WAS is designed with a set of tools for monitoring and managing applications, enabling organizations to optimize performance and resolve issues efficiently.

Increased flexibility: The solution integrates with a range of IBM and third-party products, providing organizations with a flexible platform for developing and running web-based applications.

Improved developer productivity: It supports the latest Java EE specifications, allowing developers to use the latest technologies and development methodologies when building applications.

Better customer experience: Organizations can deliver faster and more reliable applications, improving the overall customer experience.

Scalability: IBM WAS provides a scalable and secure platform for deploying and managing applications, so organizations can quickly respond to changing business requirements.

Reviews from Real Users

IBM WebSphere Application Server is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Some of its major advantages are that it is stable, supports many languages, and is resilient.

Princewill O., Head Banking Application Customization and Reporting at a financial services firm, states, “[The solution is] very stable, supports many languages, and helpful for faster time to market.”

"What's most valuable in IBM WebSphere Application Server is its resilience. When you use the solution, you know that after the communication has been done, there will be no doubt that the data has reached its destination,” says Nicolae C., System and Solutions Architect at Seidor.

Another PeerSpot reviewer, an Enterprise Technical Leader at a tech services company mentions, “[It is an] enterprise-level product with extensive console capabilities, including the ability to control multiple JVM containers.”

IBM

Oracle WebLogic Suite is an integrated solution for building onpremise cloud application infrastructures that span web server, application server and data grid technology tiers. It includes Oracle WebLogic Server, an application server for developing and deploying applications across conventional and cloud environments, Oracle Coherence Enterprise Edition, Oracle Web Tier, Oracle TopLink, Oracle Java Mission Control and Flight Recorder, and other component technologies.

Oracle

Sample Customers

TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal League

State Revenue Office Victoria, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Reliance Commercial Finance, Center for Railway Information Systems, Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, MCB Bank, Pacfico Seguros Generales

Buyer's Guide

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. WebLogic Suite

July 2025

Free Report: IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. WebLogic Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. WebLogic Suite and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. WebLogic Suite report.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.