Imanami GroupID vs OneLogin comparison

Imanami and One Identity are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Imanami is ranked #36, while One Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Imanami holds a 0.6% mindshare in IAMS, compared to One Identity’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imanami users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Imanami GroupID

Read 3 Imanami GroupID reviews

800 Views
360 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Read 40 OneLogin reviews

5,709 Views
2,227 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Imanami GroupID

OneLogin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

OneLogin and Imanami GroupID compete in the identity and access management market. OneLogin has the advantage in pricing and support, while Imanami GroupID offers more comprehensive features.

Features: OneLogin provides robust single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and seamless application integration. Imanami GroupID offers advanced group management, directory services, and is more suitable for organizations needing comprehensive directory management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Imanami GroupID is more complex to deploy but offers robust customer support beneficial for enterprises requiring specialized guidance.

Pricing and ROI: OneLogin has a competitive setup cost and quicker ROI due to efficient deployment and support. Imanami GroupID may involve higher initial costs but offers significant long-term ROI for organizations prioritizing advanced directory capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imanami GroupID

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

12th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

36th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Active Directory Management (19th)

OneLogin

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

5th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Access Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Imanami GroupID is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneLogin is 2.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin	2.6%
Imanami GroupID	0.6%
Other	96.8%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Cauthorn

Identity and Access Management Manager at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement

I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"OneLogin is efficient."

"OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by giving complete clarity of all environments in a single console."

"OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by increasing security features and making our security wall more robust as well as preventing unauthorized access from dormant accounts, making our system safer than ever before."

"Since implementing OneLogin by One Identity, the biggest positive change I've noticed is how much smoother and faster my workday feels."

"My impressions of the Identity Synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is seamless and syncs every identity seamlessly."

"In my role, the most valuable features are two-factor authentication and self-service password reset. The most helpful feature for the institution as a whole is probably the single sign-on. As an IT director, I care about security and ease of use."

"Once I made the OneLogin ID, it would essentially make user names and passwords for every application that we had."

"OneLogin's best features are the whole package, which includes the combination of the integration with Active Directory, user provisioning, and the graphical user interface."

More OneLogin pros

Cons

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."

"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."

"OneLogin could be improved if there were easy configuration options."

"OneLogin needs to increase the number of connectors available out of the box to connect to the different endpoints. The number of out-of-box connectors should be increased."

"There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features."

"This product doesn't necessarily provide us with all of the functionality that we need, such as being able to share passwords with external users."

"OneLogin could be improved with simpler user management features, though the current interface is relatively straightforward to use."

"OneLogin offers a Virtual LDAP feature that we utilize, although it differs slightly from traditional LDAP servers."

"I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability."

"The only downside I see with OneLogin is that there are some limitations with using the apps provisioning APIs that can lead to some termination or provisioning action not being completed."

More OneLogin cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Media Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

The areas of OneLogin that have room for improvement include that AI is not for me. There are tools where AI does not belong, in my opinion, and this is one of them. I don't see any benefits of hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin's use case in my organization is for the entire infrastructure because it was very outdated, not secure, and it was built Windows heavy despite us being a Mac environment. I decided to go ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

The advice I would give others looking to implement OneLogin is that there are a lot of tools out there. If this is something where the basic package fits for people or they need all those extra be...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 17% of the time

e-trust Horacius vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 17% of the time

One Identity Active Roles vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 16% of the time

Softerra Adaxes vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds Access Rights Manager vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 9% of the time

More Imanami GroupID Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

March 2026

Download Imanami GroupID product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

March 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Also Known As

No data available

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

Groups don’t live forever. Project teams disband, departments re-organize, and employees change status. GroupID from Imanami leverages the pervasiveness of Microsoft® Active Directory and empowers IT professionals with the tools needed to effectively provision and manage users. Users can be quickly entered into the correct distribution and security groups, and are easily managed across multiple systems.

There Are Three Main Benefits To A Complete Group Management Solution:

Reduce the load on the IT staff and helpdesk
Improve employee productivity by putting users in the correct distribution groups immediately
Improve security by having each security group’s membership accurate immediately

Groups Are Never Out Of Date.

Users are empowered to solve common problems independently. Security and access aren’t compromised. IT is empowered with the right tools to help employees. Staff productivity goes up. What more could you want?

Imanami

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Grant Thornton LLP

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin

March 2026

Free Report: Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin

Find out what your peers are saying about Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors and best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.