Imanami GroupID vs OneLogin comparison

Imanami and One Identity are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Imanami is ranked #35, while One Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.5. Imanami holds a 0.8% mindshare in IAMS, compared to One Identity’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imanami users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Imanami GroupID

Read 3 Imanami GroupID reviews

1,135 Views
522 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Read 72 OneLogin reviews

7,984 Views
3,194 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Imanami GroupID

OneLogin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

OneLogin and Imanami GroupID compete in the identity and access management market. OneLogin has the advantage in pricing and support, while Imanami GroupID offers more comprehensive features.

Features: OneLogin provides robust single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and seamless application integration. Imanami GroupID offers advanced group management, directory services, and is more suitable for organizations needing comprehensive directory management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Imanami GroupID is more complex to deploy but offers robust customer support beneficial for enterprises requiring specialized guidance.

Pricing and ROI: OneLogin has a competitive setup cost and quicker ROI due to efficient deployment and support. Imanami GroupID may involve higher initial costs but offers significant long-term ROI for organizations prioritizing advanced directory capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imanami GroupID

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

13th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Active Directory Management (19th)

OneLogin

Ranking in User Provisioning Software

4th

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Access Management (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Imanami GroupID is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneLogin is 2.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin	2.8%
Imanami GroupID	0.8%
Other	96.4%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Cauthorn

Identity and Access Management Manager at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement

I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system, and based on that job code, we use the query tool so that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should, which runs every night so that the next day everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."

"The most valuable feature is the ease with which we can manage the sign-on feature."

"OneLogin helps improve security posture, increases user productivity by allowing access to multiple applications with a single password, and has reduced support tickets once users fully learned how to use the tool."

"When it comes to access management, the solution's single pane of glass is extremely important. The single pane of glass for access management enables collaborative work between IT and security. We have access to certain applications that require device trust. Based on the role, we can access those applications through OneLogin Desktop."

"The best feature of OneLogin is the mapping feature, which stands out as the most beneficial, as the mapping works better in OneLogin, allowing me to sync users from Google Group to OneLogin role, which is crucial for role access for end users and new service requests."

"My impression of OneLogin providing a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating is positive because I never had any issues or glitches."

"The best feature that OneLogin offers in my experience is how much time it saves everyone, not just IT but every single employee in the organization."

"Security incidents have gone down because of the stronger authentication, and our IT team has saved a lot of time on access issues."

"The single sign-on feature of OneLogin is the most valuable and useful for me, as it allows one-click access to all apps, eliminating password juggling and frustration while providing centralized access control."

More OneLogin pros

Cons

"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky."

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."

"OneLogin has been a good experience, but there is a scope of improvement in every application, especially in the admin user interface and overall usability."

"While I initially used OneLogin's desktop feature to extend SSO, I discontinued it two years ago due to limitations."

"However, if there were multiple documentations about the technical points and what each tab on the GUI is used for, it would be very helpful for others who want to learn, because I did not find a lot of resources about it on the internet."

"Customer support is very poor."

"having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

"One thing that can be improved is that we got some false positives when remote employees were switching networks in the first week, which took some time to fine-tune and settle as per our environment, so that can be more simplified in the initial start."

"Performance is lacking sometimes and having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

"OneLogin should provide better documentation on configuring policies and roles and ensure that customer support is available 24/7 with experienced staff to improve the complexity of the deployment process."

More OneLogin cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Media Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

16%

University

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	91
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

Overall, OneLogin is a strong solution, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. One area is the user interface. It is functional, but at times, it can feel a bit less intuitive, espec...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

The main reason we use OneLogin is to securely manage employee access to different applications from a single platform. It helps us streamline logins through single sign-on, so users do not have to...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

My advice would be to first clearly understand your organization's identity and access requirements before implementing OneLogin. It is a powerful platform, but you will get the most value when you...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 18% of the time

One Identity Active Roles vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 16% of the time

e-trust Horacius vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 12% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 10% of the time

Softerra Adaxes vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 8% of the time

More Imanami GroupID Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

April 2026

Download Imanami GroupID product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

April 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Also Known As

No data available

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

Imanami GroupID offers a sophisticated group management and automation solution, streamlining user provisioning and access control. Designed for IT professionals, it enhances operational efficiency and security.

Imanami GroupID specializes in providing automated solutions for group management challenges faced by IT departments. By simplifying access control, it ensures that users have the necessary permissions while preventing unauthorized access. Automated provisioning and dynamic management of Active Directory groups help maintain security and compliance. Integration capabilities with existing systems further amplify its functionality.

What are the standout features of Imanami GroupID?

Dynamic Group Management: Automates group membership based on set policies, ensuring accurate access permissions.
Automated Provisioning: Simplifies user account creation and rights assignment, reducing administrative burden.
Self-Service Portal: Allows users to manage memberships, reducing IT department dependence for minor changes.
Audit and Compliance: Provides reporting tools to track changes and maintain regulatory adherence.
Integration Support: Compatible with systems like LDAP and various identity platforms for seamless operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Imanami GroupID?

Enhanced Security: Automating access controls minimizes unauthorized access, safeguarding data.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, freeing IT resources for strategic initiatives.
Cost Savings: Lower administrative costs through automation and better resource utilization.
Compliance Assurance: Automated audit trails ensure compliance with industry regulations.
User Empowerment: Self-service capabilities improve user satisfaction and productivity.

Industries with strict access control requirements, such as finance and healthcare, often deploy Imanami GroupID to enforce security protocols effectively. Educational institutions use it to manage faculty and student access to various resources efficiently. Its adaptability to different industry needs makes it a versatile choice for enhancing access management across sectors.

Imanami

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Grant Thornton LLP

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Buyer's Guide

Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin

April 2026

Free Report: Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin

Find out what your peers are saying about Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors and best User Provisioning Software vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.