Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
OneLogin Logo

Top 10 OneLogin Alternatives

Vendor: One Identity
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top OneLogin Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OneLogin based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, and Omada Identity. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. OneLogin surpasses its competitors by offering robust single sign-on and multi-factor authentication features, enhancing security and user experience, while providing seamless integration with popular business applications and an intuitive interface for efficient identity management.

One Identity Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with One Identity, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
OneLogin Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Microsoft Entra ID
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin offers efficient onboarding, user-friendly management, and seamless remote work integration, making it ideal for cloud-focused organizations. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID's extensive application integration and multifactor authentication advantage larger enterprises seeking comprehensive security and flexible deployment.
Download Microsoft Entra ID vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin has competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Entra ID presents a more complex pricing structure.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin has competitive setup costs, while Microsoft Entra ID presents a more complex pricing structure.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
4.1 out of 5
SailPoint offers robust compliance capabilities with strong out-of-the-box features, ideal for organizations prioritizing governance. In comparison, OneLogin's strengths lie in seamless user onboarding and cost-effective pricing, making it an attractive option for businesses focusing on efficient cloud integration and authentication.
Download OneLogin vs. SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Report
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud has a higher setup cost, while OneLogin offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud has a higher setup cost, while OneLogin offers more budget-friendly initial expenses.
OneLogin Logo
Omada Identity
4.0 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Omada Identity
4.0 out of 5
Omada Identity offers robust governance and automation features ideal for complex requirements involving Microsoft integrations. In comparison, OneLogin's ease of integration and strong SSO capabilities make it appealing for businesses seeking simple user management and robust security, especially in cloud environments.
Download Omada Identity vs. OneLogin Report
Omada Identity has a more affordable setup cost compared to OneLogin, highlighting a key pricing difference for budget-conscious clients.
View comparison
Pricing
Omada Identity has a more affordable setup cost compared to OneLogin, highlighting a key pricing difference for budget-conscious clients.
OneLogin Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
OneLogin excels with features like Desktop SSO and multifactor authentication for seamless directory integration. In comparison, Cloudflare One emphasizes simplicity and robust security, including DDoS protection. OneLogin's public cloud focus contrasts with Cloudflare's flexibility, appealing to diverse deployment needs.
Download Cloudflare One vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin presents a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cloudflare One involves higher initial fees.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin presents a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cloudflare One involves higher initial fees.
OneLogin Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Okta Platform
4.3 out of 5
Okta offers adaptive MFA and lifecycle management for complex environments. In comparison, OneLogin is known for real-time authentication suitable for remote work. Okta's robust feature set suits large enterprises, while OneLogin's cost-effectiveness benefits mid-sized organizations.
Download Okta Platform vs. OneLogin Report
Okta Platform requires a higher initial setup cost, while OneLogin offers a more budget-friendly entry.
View comparison
Pricing
Okta Platform requires a higher initial setup cost, while OneLogin offers a more budget-friendly entry.
OneLogin Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Workspace ONE UEM
4.1 out of 5
OneLogin excels with single sign-on and AD integration, offering centralized access management. In comparison, Workspace ONE UEM provides expansive device management and VMware integration. Tech buyers seeking identity management might prefer OneLogin, while those needing broad device control may choose Workspace ONE UEM.
Download OneLogin vs. Workspace ONE UEM Report
OneLogin has a lower setup cost compared to Workspace ONE UEM, which offers a more comprehensive range of initial features.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin has a lower setup cost compared to Workspace ONE UEM, which offers a more comprehensive range of initial features.
OneLogin Logo
Saviynt
3.7 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Saviynt
3.7 out of 5
OneLogin excels with easy integration and multifactor authentication, simplifying identity management for businesses. In comparison, Saviynt offers advanced workflows and deep enterprise integration, providing a comprehensive governance solution, appealing to organizations needing detailed access insights and extensive deployment options.
Download OneLogin vs. Saviynt Report
OneLogin setup cost is lower and more straightforward compared to Saviynt, which has a higher and more complex initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin setup cost is lower and more straightforward compared to Saviynt, which has a higher and more complex initial cost.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator
4.0 out of 5
OneLogin shines with single sign-on and easy Active Directory integration, ideal for agile deployments. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator excels in robust two-factor authentication with on-premises control. OneLogin's competitive pricing suits various sectors, while Fortinet offers cost-effective security within Fortinet's ecosystem.
Download Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin typically incurs lower setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, which could impact budget considerations significantly. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator requires a more substantial initial investment, differentiating the two solutions notably in terms of cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin typically incurs lower setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, which could impact budget considerations significantly. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator requires a more substantial initial investment, differentiating the two solutions notably in terms of cost structure.
OneLogin Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Cisco Duo
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Duo emphasizes robust security with features like multi-factor authentication, appealing to those needing seamless integration within Cisco's ecosystem. In comparison, OneLogin excels in comprehensive identity management, offering single sign-on and broad platform integration, ideal for diverse environments.
Download Cisco Duo vs. OneLogin Report
Cisco Duo requires a minimal setup cost, while OneLogin's initial investment is more significant.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Duo requires a minimal setup cost, while OneLogin's initial investment is more significant.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Ping Identity Platform
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin focuses on Active Directory integration, single sign-on, and user-friendly onboarding, appealing to cloud-centric organizations. In comparison, Ping Identity Platform offers extensive developer tools and customization options, making it ideal for enterprises needing robust authentication and identity management across hybrid environments.
Download OneLogin vs. Ping Identity Platform Report
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Ping Identity Platform tends to have a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Ping Identity Platform tends to have a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and customization options.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Google Cloud Identity
3.8 out of 5
OneLogin focuses on seamless desktop SSO and centralized access management with strong integration capabilities. In comparison, Google Cloud Identity provides a user-friendly interface and comprehensive security features, making it suitable for diverse environments. Each offers specific advantages in access management and security.
Download Google Cloud Identity vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin has a setup cost that suits large enterprises, whereas Google Cloud Identity offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to smaller businesses. The difference in setup costs highlights the target market for each service.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin has a setup cost that suits large enterprises, whereas Google Cloud Identity offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to smaller businesses. The difference in setup costs highlights the target market for each service.
OneLogin Logo
Auth0 Platform
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Auth0 Platform
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin excels in integrating with Active Directory and offers features like SSO and user provisioning. In comparison, Auth0 provides robust security, compliance, and API support, making it flexible for developers. Both platforms need improvements in support response and flexibility.
Download Auth0 Platform vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin typically features a lower setup cost, while Auth0 Platform tends to have a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin typically features a lower setup cost, while Auth0 Platform tends to have a higher initial investment.
OneLogin Logo
ForgeRock
4.0 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
ForgeRock
4.0 out of 5
ForgeRock appeals to large enterprises with its robust integration capabilities, while OneLogin attracts smaller businesses with its ease of use. In comparison, OneLogin's quick deployment and strong security features make it ideal for organizations prioritizing accessibility, contrasting ForgeRock's extensive customization for complex environments.
Download ForgeRock vs. OneLogin Report
ForgeRock has a higher setup cost compared to OneLogin, highlighting a price distinction between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ForgeRock has a higher setup cost compared to OneLogin, highlighting a price distinction between the two solutions.
OneLogin Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
CyberArk Identity
4.1 out of 5
OneLogin offers simplified remote work with single sign-on and easy integration, enhancing onboarding efficiency. In comparison, CyberArk Identity focuses on advanced security and session monitoring suited for complex environments. OneLogin is cost-effective, while CyberArk Identity provides flexible deployment despite higher expenses.
Download CyberArk Identity vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin typically involves lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly for businesses starting out, while CyberArk Identity often includes higher setup costs, reflecting its comprehensive security features and robust identity management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin typically involves lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly for businesses starting out, while CyberArk Identity often includes higher setup costs, reflecting its comprehensive security features and robust identity management capabilities.
OneLogin Logo
JumpCloud
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
JumpCloud
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin excels in seamless desktop SSO and robust Active Directory integration, appealing to those favoring user-friendly management. In comparison, JumpCloud offers strong device management and flexible system compatibility, making it ideal for organizations needing comprehensive cross-platform capabilities and central authentication solutions.
Download JumpCloud vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup with limited upfront costs, while JumpCloud may involve higher initial expenses, highlighting distinct differences in their onboarding processes.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup with limited upfront costs, while JumpCloud may involve higher initial expenses, highlighting distinct differences in their onboarding processes.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM)
4.1 out of 5
OneLogin simplifies integration with AD, enhancing security with multifactor authentication and centralized management. In comparison, F5 BIG-IP APM handles complex configurations with robust load balancing, excelling in security protocols like SAML and OAuth for comprehensive support.
Download F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin has significantly lower setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which generally involves a more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin has significantly lower setup costs compared to F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), which generally involves a more substantial initial investment.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Tenable Cloud Security
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin focuses on identity management with benefits like quick deployment and cost-effectiveness for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Tenable Cloud Security emphasizes security insights with robust vulnerability scanning and monitoring, justifying higher costs through comprehensive security coverage for long-term value.
Download OneLogin vs. Tenable Cloud Security Report
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Tenable Cloud Security involves a more complex setup that may incur higher expenses. Both solutions have unique strengths tailored to specific operational needs and infrastructures.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Tenable Cloud Security involves a more complex setup that may incur higher expenses. Both solutions have unique strengths tailored to specific operational needs and infrastructures.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
IBM Security Verify Access
3.9 out of 5
OneLogin offers user-friendly experiences with features like single sign-on and efficient management options, ideal for organizations seeking streamlined operations. In comparison, IBM Security Verify Access provides robust multifactor authentication and system integration, making it suitable for large enterprises with specific security needs.
Download IBM Security Verify Access vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin offers a lower setup cost compared to IBM Security Verify Access, making it more budget-friendly for smaller businesses, while IBM's solution might justify higher costs with advanced security features appealing to larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a lower setup cost compared to IBM Security Verify Access, making it more budget-friendly for smaller businesses, while IBM's solution might justify higher costs with advanced security features appealing to larger enterprises.
OneLogin Logo
LastPass Business
3.7 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
LastPass Business
3.7 out of 5
OneLogin excels with enterprise integrations and multifactor authentication, appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, LastPass Business focuses on simplicity and strong security, attractive to those prioritizing ease of use. OneLogin emphasizes scalability, whereas LastPass Business simplifies password management for quick deployment.
Download LastPass Business vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while LastPass Business, with a higher initial cost, offers more robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while LastPass Business, with a higher initial cost, offers more robust features.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Microsoft Active Directory
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin offers cloud-based deployment flexibility and strong integration with various applications, enhancing user management with robust features like SSO and multifactor authentication. In comparison, Microsoft Active Directory excels in integrating within Microsoft environments, offering stability and familiar on-premises and hybrid deployment options.
Download Microsoft Active Directory vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin offers competitive and straightforward setup costs, while Microsoft Active Directory presents higher initial expenses, reflecting its extensive integration and enterprise capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers competitive and straightforward setup costs, while Microsoft Active Directory presents higher initial expenses, reflecting its extensive integration and enterprise capabilities.
OneLogin Logo
Amazon Cognito
3.8 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Amazon Cognito
3.8 out of 5
OneLogin excels in ease of integration and centralized management with features like SmartFactor Authentication, simplifying onboarding for non-technical users. In comparison, Amazon Cognito's strength lies in scalability and integration with AWS services, though it often requires handling complex configurations.
Download Amazon Cognito vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin has a low setup cost, attracting small businesses, while Amazon Cognito requires a larger initial investment, appealing to enterprises seeking scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin has a low setup cost, attracting small businesses, while Amazon Cognito requires a larger initial investment, appealing to enterprises seeking scalability.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Oracle Identity Governance
3.7 out of 5
OneLogin offers user-friendly identity management with single sign-on and multifactor authentication, enhancing security. In comparison, Oracle Identity Governance provides detailed lifecycle management and audit capabilities, catering to enterprises needing comprehensive governance. Both suit different infrastructure and pricing needs, appealing to distinct market segments.
Download OneLogin vs. Oracle Identity Governance Report
OneLogin setup cost is straightforward and budget-friendly, while Oracle Identity Governance can involve more complex and higher initial fees, highlighting a key distinction in cost structure between these identity management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin setup cost is straightforward and budget-friendly, while Oracle Identity Governance can involve more complex and higher initial fees, highlighting a key distinction in cost structure between these identity management solutions.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Symantec Siteminder
4.0 out of 5
Symantec Siteminder is favored for its robust support and competitive pricing, appealing to enterprises with complex needs. In comparison, OneLogin excels in ease of integration and usability, offering advanced features for dynamic environments seeking scalable cloud-focused solutions.
Download OneLogin vs. Symantec Siteminder Report
Symantec Siteminder incurs higher setup costs compared to OneLogin, which offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Siteminder incurs higher setup costs compared to OneLogin, which offers a more economical initial investment.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration is ideal for enterprises needing extensive policy management and workflow customization. In comparison, OneLogin offers seamless cloud integration with single sign-on and multifactor authentication, appealing to organizations prioritizing cloud security and ease of use.
Download OneLogin vs. Symantec Identity Governance and Administration Report
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration has a higher setup cost compared to OneLogin, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Identity Governance and Administration has a higher setup cost compared to OneLogin, which offers a more affordable initial setup.
OneLogin Logo
Axiad Conductor
4.8 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Axiad Conductor
4.8 out of 5
OneLogin offers competitive pricing and strong support for efficient identity management. In comparison, Axiad Conductor delivers robust features with comprehensive authentication and credential management, catering to complex security needs and maximizing ROI, appealing to tech buyers seeking enhanced security despite higher initial investment.
Download Axiad Conductor vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin's setup cost is lower than Axiad Conductor's, making it the more affordable choice for small businesses. Axiad Conductor offers a higher setup cost, which could indicate a more comprehensive setup feature.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin's setup cost is lower than Axiad Conductor's, making it the more affordable choice for small businesses. Axiad Conductor offers a higher setup cost, which could indicate a more comprehensive setup feature.
OneLogin Logo
Imprivata OneSign
4.5 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Imprivata OneSign
4.5 out of 5
Imprivata OneSign focuses on healthcare compliance with strong biometric authentication. In comparison, OneLogin emphasizes flexibility with vast cloud integrations. Imprivata appeals to sectors needing specialized support, while OneLogin’s scalable pricing and broad application attract businesses prioritizing budget management and rapid expansion.
Download Imprivata OneSign vs. OneLogin Report
Imprivata OneSign has a notably higher setup cost compared to OneLogin, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Imprivata OneSign has a notably higher setup cost compared to OneLogin, which offers a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
ManageEngine Password Manager Pro
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Password Manager Pro offers cost-effective pricing and strong support for budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, OneLogin provides advanced security features and integration capabilities, appealing to those seeking a comprehensive, robust solution despite the higher investment.
Download ManageEngine Password Manager Pro vs. OneLogin Report
ManageEngine Password Manager Pro offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive feature set, whereas OneLogin presents a more budget-friendly option but with limited initial features.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Password Manager Pro offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its comprehensive feature set, whereas OneLogin presents a more budget-friendly option but with limited initial features.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin is favored for its easy deployment and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla provides extensive security features for complex identity needs. OneLogin attracts those prioritizing straightforward setup, while CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla suits enterprises requiring advanced identity management capabilities.
Download CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin offers competitive setup costs, while CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla presents a more robust pricing structure. CyberArk's advanced features may justify its cost for larger enterprises, contrasting OneLogin's affordability for smaller teams.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers competitive setup costs, while CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla presents a more robust pricing structure. CyberArk's advanced features may justify its cost for larger enterprises, contrasting OneLogin's affordability for smaller teams.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Thales SafeNet Trusted Access
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin provides cost-effective pricing and excellent support. In comparison, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access offers comprehensive features suitable for complex needs. OneLogin's ease of deployment attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access appeals to those prioritizing functionality and advanced access management.
Download OneLogin vs. Thales SafeNet Trusted Access Report
OneLogin offers competitive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access may involve higher initial setup expenses but provides robust security features.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers competitive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access may involve higher initial setup expenses but provides robust security features.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Microsoft Entra ID Governance
3.8 out of 5
OneLogin is known for effortless integration with Active Directory and efficient remote work management. In comparison, Microsoft Entra ID Governance excels within Microsoft ecosystems with powerful multifactor authentication. OneLogin appeals to cloud-centric operations, while Microsoft Entra suits businesses leveraging Microsoft applications.
Download Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Microsoft Entra ID Governance may involve a more complex setup with potentially higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while Microsoft Entra ID Governance may involve a more complex setup with potentially higher expenses.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
AWS IAM Identity Center
4.4 out of 5
OneLogin excels with its user-friendly identity management, ideal for remote work, combining SSO and multifactor authentication. In comparison, AWS IAM Identity Center offers extensive security configurations with automation and centralized permissions, appealing to large enterprises seeking cost-effective access management solutions.
Download AWS IAM Identity Center vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup experience, while AWS IAM Identity Center requires more initial configuration effort. OneLogin's setup cost may be higher due to ease of use, contrasting with AWS IAM Identity Center's more demanding setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup experience, while AWS IAM Identity Center requires more initial configuration effort. OneLogin's setup cost may be higher due to ease of use, contrasting with AWS IAM Identity Center's more demanding setup process.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
SecureAuth Identity Platform
2.8 out of 5
SecureAuth Identity Platform excels in security with advanced multifactor authentication, offering extensive customization. In comparison, OneLogin provides seamless integration and quick deployment via cloud-based models. A tech buyer might choose SecureAuth for its robust security or OneLogin for its cost-efficiency and integration speed.
Download OneLogin vs. SecureAuth Identity Platform Report
SecureAuth Identity Platform has a more customizable setup cost whereas OneLogin typically offers a straightforward pricing structure, highlighting cost flexibility versus simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
SecureAuth Identity Platform has a more customizable setup cost whereas OneLogin typically offers a straightforward pricing structure, highlighting cost flexibility versus simplicity.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management
4.0 out of 5
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management offers robust security and extensive integration, suitable for highly customized enterprise needs. In comparison, OneLogin's SSO capabilities and mobile readiness attract organizations seeking intuitive user access. i-Sprint's tailored deployment contrasts with OneLogin's quick setup and responsive service.
Download OneLogin vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Report
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management incurs higher initial costs, contrasting with OneLogin's more economical setup expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management incurs higher initial costs, contrasting with OneLogin's more economical setup expenditure.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Red Hat Single Sign On
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin is preferred for seamless integration, user-friendly interfaces, and robust multifactor authentication. In comparison, Red Hat Single Sign On is chosen for strong customization options and open-source benefits, appealing to users needing flexible deployment across diverse IT infrastructures.
Download OneLogin vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report
OneLogin typically has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Red Hat Single Sign-On can involve more complex initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin typically has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Red Hat Single Sign-On can involve more complex initial expenses.
OneLogin Logo
Gluu Flex
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Gluu Flex
4.3 out of 5
OneLogin excels in pricing and support, appealing to businesses prioritizing rapid deployment and cost efficiency. In comparison, Gluu Flex's feature richness and customization attract tech buyers seeking advanced capabilities, even if it requires a more complex setup for tailored security solutions.
Download Gluu Flex vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin's setup cost is upfront and fixed, while Gluu Flex offers a more flexible pricing model with potential for lower initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin's setup cost is upfront and fixed, while Gluu Flex offers a more flexible pricing model with potential for lower initial costs.
OneLogin Logo
Tools4ever HelloID
4.9 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Tools4ever HelloID
4.9 out of 5
OneLogin emphasizes secure single sign-on and seamless app integrations, attracting those valuing cost-effective deployment. In comparison, Tools4ever HelloID appeals with advanced provisioning and personalized support, favoring organizations desiring flexible implementation and comprehensive features despite higher upfront costs.
Download OneLogin vs. Tools4ever HelloID Report
OneLogin offers a more streamlined setup process with lower initial costs, whereas Tools4ever HelloID presents higher setup expenses but potentially richer features for complex environments.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a more streamlined setup process with lower initial costs, whereas Tools4ever HelloID presents higher setup expenses but potentially richer features for complex environments.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence
3.8 out of 5
OneLogin’s pricing and support make it appealing for budget-focused buyers. In comparison, IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence attracts those seeking comprehensive governance features. OneLogin excels in cloud-based deployment, while IBM suits complex needs with detailed compliance tools and thorough support.
Download IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup cost, while IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence involves a more complex and potentially higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin offers a straightforward setup cost, while IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence involves a more complex and potentially higher setup investment.
OneLogin Logo
Imanami GroupID
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin Logo
Imanami GroupID
4.2 out of 5
OneLogin excels in pricing with efficient deployment, favored for its single sign-on and multifactor authentication. In comparison, Imanami GroupID, appealing with advanced group management and synchronization, suits companies needing detailed active directory support, despite higher initial costs.
Download Imanami GroupID vs. OneLogin Report
OneLogin setup costs are generally higher compared to Imanami GroupID's more affordable setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin setup costs are generally higher compared to Imanami GroupID's more affordable setup expenses.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
HID Global Actividentity
1 out of 5
HID Global Actividentity appeals to buyers needing robust security and straightforward deployment. In comparison, OneLogin provides a feature-rich environment with seamless integration, appealing to those seeking advanced capabilities and scalability. HID's cost-effectiveness contrasts with OneLogin's higher upfront cost yet superior long-term value.
HID Global Actividentity presents a moderately high setup cost, while OneLogin offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
HID Global Actividentity presents a moderately high setup cost, while OneLogin offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
OneLogin Logo
OneLogin Logo
Comarch Identity and Access Management
1 out of 5
OneLogin excels in pricing and support, ideal for straightforward deployments needing basic identity features. In comparison, Comarch Identity and Access Management, with its detailed audit capabilities and compliance support, is appealing for complex environments despite a more intricate deployment and higher costs.
OneLogin requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Comarch Identity and Access Management offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
OneLogin requires a higher initial setup cost, whereas Comarch Identity and Access Management offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Related categories

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)
Single Sign-On (SSO)
User Provisioning Software