OneLogin vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

One Identity and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. One Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Red Hat is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.0. One Identity holds a 4.1% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

OneLogin

Read 95 OneLogin reviews

9,442 Views
4,627 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

1,424 Views
1,410 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

OneLogin and Red Hat Single Sign On are key competitors in the identity and access management sector. Red Hat Single Sign On holds an advantage with its open-source flexibility and strong community support, enabling higher customization and extensibility.

Features: OneLogin provides comprehensive features including Single Sign-On (SSO), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and extensive user provisioning with SSO connectors and SAML integrations that support a wide application range. It also offers API automation and directory synchronization facilities. Red Hat Single Sign On excels in open-source flexibility, integration with microservices using OIDC protocols, and high customization and extensibility options.

Room for Improvement: OneLogin could see enhancements in analytical reporting, third-party application integrations, and custom login experience improvements. Red Hat Single Sign On might benefit from improved technical support services, enhanced scalability, and better security features similar to cloud-based solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin is typically deployed in Public Cloud environments, with private and hybrid options available but receives mixed reviews on customer support, particularly after One Identity's acquisition. Red Hat SSO offers on-premises and hybrid cloud deployment options, gaining positive feedback for reliable customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OneLogin's pricing is viewed as reasonable relative to competitors like Okta by some, though others find it expensive, with a per-user model offering decent ROI in time savings and reduced IT workload. Red Hat SSO is generally seen as affordable, especially alongside an OpenShift subscription, providing excellent value for cost-conscious organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed OneLogin vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OneLogin

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (4th), Identity Management (IM) (4th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (3rd), Access Management (4th)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of OneLogin is 4.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 1.6%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin	4.1%
Red Hat Single Sign On	1.6%
Other	94.3%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Around 30 to 40 percent of time is saved since using OneLogin, and the error has been reduced because a single login manages all the applications, significantly cutting down on errors."

"It improves access management, simplifies authentication with SSO, and helps reduce manual effort for onboarding and offboarding."

"Overall, it not only strengthens security but also simplifies the access management process, making daily operations more efficient and manageable."

"SmartFactor Authentication stands out for me because it supports no compromise."

"We have been able to save sixty-five to seventy percent of time, and we have also seen enhanced security overall."

"The most valuable feature is the ease with which we can manage the sign-on feature."

"Overall it has resulted in a highly productive IT services organization."

"OneLogin has positively impacted my organization because it gives me audit logs and compliance, both of which are very important for many of my clients, especially for this oncology hospital."

More OneLogin pros

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"I like that the solution is open source and you can use a commercial edition of it without any charge."

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

Cons

"You should build the documentation a little better and more clearly because it is currently a convoluted mess, but that goes for every One Identity product."

"OneLogin could improve a bit in loading speed or in the interface so that it is even more intuitive, but overall it works very well."

"Performance is lacking sometimes and having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

"I would like better reporting from SmartFactor Authentication when a user is not able to sign in due to a new location, new IP, new device, et cetera."

"Based on my experience, I would recommend OneLogin for its simplicity and easier administration for small organizations, but I would not recommend it for organizations seeking more feature-oriented and deeper IAM capabilities."

"Sometimes there is a slight delay in getting the code, but overall it is smooth and reliable."

"Currently, I'm much more focused on Okta, as the solution hasn't really met our requirements."

"The areas for improvement in OneLogin include better analytics since we do not have very end-to-end visualization of user access logs."

More OneLogin cons

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

"Security could be improved."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"I think they could provide additional features in terms of users trying to manipulate the system with regard to security."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Government

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	125
Midsize Enterprise	30
Large Enterprise	66

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

During implementation, there were not many features that I remember not using in practice. Mostly, there were certain APIs that we were experimenting with earlier but did not use, so we created cus...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

My main use case for OneLogin is to enforce workforce identity, and we implemented this in Malaysia's biggest retail client, so all of their employees' applications can be securely accessed through...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

When I am working in OneLogin on a normal day or week, the first thing I typically do in the platform is handling SSO configurations, so I add applications and interact with application stakeholder...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?

Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Single Sign On?

Earlier, customers used to authenticate the user before they used the application. With the help of Single Sign On, the customer logs in and uses all of the customer's applications without authenti...

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 21% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 19% of the time

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 7% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 6% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

June 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

June 2026

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Red Hat Single Sign On is an open-source platform offering fast, scalable, and customizable SSO solutions. It supports popular protocols and integrates with social logins and enterprise solutions to provide seamless authentication across applications.

Red Hat Single Sign On provides fast and flexible authentication, enhancing security across different applications. It supports standardized SSO protocols like OpenID Connect and integrates easily with multiple platforms. Its open-source nature, backed by Red Hat's commercial support, allows community contributions and adaptable capabilities. However, it could improve its integration with Windows products and enhance its security features, including detection mechanisms and audit reports. Scalability and documentation are key areas for development, and users seek advanced tracking for unauthorized access attempts.

What are the key features of Red Hat Single Sign On?

Open Source: Community-driven with extensive documentation and flexibility for customization.
SSO Protocol Support: Compatible with standard protocols like OpenID Connect for seamless integration.
Social Login Integration: Easily integrates with social platforms, enhancing user experience.
Scalable Design: Efficiently handles authentication across multiple clusters.
Commercial Support: Backed by Red Hat for professional support and reliability.

What benefits or ROI should be evaluated when considering Red Hat Single Sign On?

Enhanced Security: Streamlined processes reduce risk, ensuring secure access across applications.
Flexibility: Open-source nature offers adaptable functionality for diverse requirements.
Community Contributions: Benefits from continuous improvements and new features.
Cost-Effective: Transition from Keycloak to paid subscription offers robust capabilities.

Industries, especially those requiring robust security and scalability, implement Red Hat Single Sign On to manage authentication. It integrates with enterprise solutions and identity providers, streamlining login processes and reducing complexities. Organizations appreciate its adaptability when transitioning from Keycloak, experiencing enhanced application authentication and password security.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

June 2026

Free Report: OneLogin vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about OneLogin vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OneLogin vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.