OneLogin vs Symantec Siteminder comparison

One Identity and Broadcom are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. One Identity is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #13 with an average rating of 6.8. One Identity holds a 4.0% mindshare in SSO, compared to Broadcom’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of One Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

OneLogin

Read 40 OneLogin reviews

5,709 Views
2,797 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Symantec Siteminder

Read 75 Symantec Siteminder reviews

2,692 Views
1,723 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Symantec Siteminder

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Symantec Siteminder and OneLogin are products in the identity and access management sector. Symantec Siteminder excels in support and pricing, whereas OneLogin, with its robust features, presents strong competition for those prioritizing capabilities over cost.

Features: Symantec Siteminder offers enterprise-grade security, extensive policy management, and flexible authentication methods, ideal for large organizations. OneLogin, on the other hand, provides versatile integrations, user-friendly SSO functionalities, and seamless user provisioning, making it attractive to businesses seeking comprehensive and easy-to-use solutions.

Room for Improvement: Symantec Siteminder could enhance ease of deployment, streamline integration with modern systems, and improve scalability for cloud environments. OneLogin might refine its pricing structure, expand customer support hours, and increase its offline capabilities for broader organizational use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Siteminder requires significant technical expertise during deployment but benefits from reliable customer service. OneLogin leverages a cloud-based model for quicker setup and scaling, with responsive support tailored for faster resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec Siteminder is more cost-effective initially but slower in ROI due to its complex deployment. OneLogin may have a higher upfront cost but offers faster implementation and operational efficiencies, resulting in a quicker ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OneLogin vs. Symantec Siteminder Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin vs. Symantec Siteminder

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OneLogin

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

6th

Ranking in Access Management

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (5th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th)

Symantec Siteminder

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

13th

Ranking in Access Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Access Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of OneLogin is 4.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Siteminder is 2.6%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin	4.0%
Symantec Siteminder	2.6%
Other	93.4%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Muzi Lubisi

Senior technical Consultant at CA Africa

Improved user experience with seamless integration and easy installation

The feature that I mostly valued is the ease of installation on different systems, especially on Windows. Additionally, it is very beneficial for deploying single sign-on sessions between different windows on a web browser, provided I am connected to the right identity provider. That seamless integration significantly improves user experience and efficiency.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Documentation."

"The directory integration and SCIM provisioning are probably the best features compared to competitors."

"Ease of integration with AD."

"SmartFactor Authentication stands out for me because it supports no compromise."

"Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin."

"When it comes to access management, the solution's single pane of glass is extremely important. The single pane of glass for access management enables collaborative work between IT and security. We have access to certain applications that require device trust. Based on the role, we can access those applications through OneLogin Desktop."

"The best feature of OneLogin is the mapping feature, which stands out as the most beneficial, as the mapping works better in OneLogin, allowing me to sync users from Google Group to OneLogin role, which is crucial for role access for end users and new service requests."

"The best features of OneLogin are probably the multi-region capabilities because for multinational companies that have offices around the world in different countries with different languages, OneLogin has native capabilities to help integrate all of that."

More OneLogin pros

"The security and single sign-on (SSO) features are the most valuable."

"If you look at our organization, and really all financial institutions, we have a lot of legacy apps. So it really helps to get Single Sign-On."

"It is pretty easy to learn."

"They really made life simple for the user and the user experience has improved."

"It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate."

"It really improved the speed to market from account creation through provisioning and onboarding, and as users move from system to system, their account access follows them so you don't need to create new credentials every time."

"It restricts cookie replacement and provides enhanced ones, so the applications are safer, helping keep our data secure in a much better way without affecting user experience."

"It helps protect our applications and provides identity management."

More Symantec Siteminder pros

Cons

"OneLogin could be improved with simpler user management features, though the current interface is relatively straightforward to use."

"As of now, I have not seen a return on investment."

"More off-hour support."

"Performance is lacking sometimes and having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

"The areas for improvement in OneLogin include better analytics since we do not have very end-to-end visualization of user access logs."

"In terms of managing the users on a large scale, it would be easier if they had some kind of user management portal."

"You should build the documentation a little better and more clearly because it is currently a convoluted mess, but that goes for every One Identity product."

"The only downside I see with OneLogin is that there are some limitations with using the apps provisioning APIs that can lead to some termination or provisioning action not being completed."

More OneLogin cons

"Unfortunately, SSO doesn't really allow us to do that. We have to basically do it through brute force."

"In future releases, I would like to see maybe more capabilities with some more modern authentication."

"It's a hit and miss thing, like all support organizations. For the most part, for simple problems they can get to a resolution fairly quickly, but if the problem is a little more complicated, they really struggle with getting us a solution."

"While I have some integration with a few major providers, support for more would be advantageous."

"The tech support has not been very good for us so we don't use them anymore."

"We installed one version and there is a bug in it; from a customer perspective I would want that particular issue to be fixed rather than getting an answer that the bug will be fixed in the next version."

"Some of the features need to be improved. For example, the Federation feature."

"Upgrade planning is extensive and costly and involves a lot of applications, so we’d like to see that improved."

More Symantec Siteminder cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Siteminder is a little costly. You pay for licensing, and they offer packages, so if you have less users, then you have to buy different products at different prices. If you have more of a user base, then the package is different. They also include other features—for example, if you have a database and you're using Siteminder, then it's good to use a Semantic-specific database, but if you are using less, then you have to purchase the database separately. Whereas if you are going for a bigger license, then it comes within the package. It depends on which plan you are using."

"CA solutions are generally expensive but for the customer the ROI is big."

"The price is quite comparable to the other enterprise-level solutions in that market."

"The solution's pricing is competitive."

"I recommend conducting a PoC on every available product before choose one."

"The licensing is fair for this solution."

"Symantec Siteminder is expensive; they could definitely do better on the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

23%

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	32

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	69

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

The areas of OneLogin that have room for improvement include that AI is not for me. There are tools where AI does not belong, in my opinion, and this is one of them. I don't see any benefits of hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin's use case in my organization is for the entire infrastructure because it was very outdated, not secure, and it was built Windows heavy despite us being a Mac environment. I decided to go ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

The advice I would give others looking to implement OneLogin is that there are a lot of tools out there. If this is something where the basic package fits for people or they need all those extra be...

See all answers

What do you like most about Symantec Siteminder?

It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Siteminder?

My experience with pricing is that it is all good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Siteminder?

Symantec Siteminder needs to have adaptive authentication and multi-factor authentication as integrated features. Currently, multi-factor authentication is available as a separate solution, and it ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Ping Identity Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 13% of the time

Okta Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 11% of the time

Keeper Enterprise Password Manager vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 7% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs Symantec Siteminder

Compared 7% of the time

More Symantec Siteminder Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

March 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Siteminder

February 2026

Download Symantec Siteminder product report

Also Known As

OneLogin Workforce Identity

SiteMinder, CA SSO, Layer7 SiteMinder

Overview

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Symantec® SiteMinder is designed to secure the modern enterprise through a unified access management platform that applies the appropriate authentication mechanism to positively identify users; provides single sign-on and identity federation for seamless access to any application; enforces granular security policies to stop unauthorized access to sensitive resources; and monitors and manages the entire user session to prevent session hijacking. Finally, Symantec SiteMinder is battle-tested and has been deployed in the largest IT environments in the world.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

British Telecom, CoreBlox, DBS, HMS, Itera ASA and Simeo

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin vs. Symantec Siteminder

March 2026

Free Report: OneLogin vs. Symantec Siteminder

Find out what your peers are saying about OneLogin vs. Symantec Siteminder and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OneLogin vs. Symantec Siteminder report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.