Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs OneLogin comparison

Microsoft and One Identity are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7, while One Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 3.2% mindshare in IAMS, compared to One Identity’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Read 13 Microsoft Entra ID Governance reviews

1,606 Views
1,558 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneLogin

Read 40 OneLogin reviews

5,709 Views
2,227 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

OneLogin

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

OneLogin and Microsoft Entra ID Governance are notable contenders in the identity and access management sector. OneLogin distinguishes itself through multinational flexibility and API automation, while Microsoft excels in seamless integration within its ecosystem.

Features: OneLogin improves productivity with Multi-Factor Authentication, Single Sign-On, and user provisioning. Its multinational flexibility and API automation are advantageous for global businesses. Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides access reviews, privileged identity management, and a strong integration with Microsoft applications, enhancing security and user management within its ecosystem.

Room for Improvement: OneLogin users have noted the need for more out-of-the-box connectors and enhanced analytics capabilities. Stability issues and an outdated interface were also highlighted. Microsoft Entra ID Governance could benefit from refining its workflow approval process, enhancing third-party integration, and improving documentation for more granular control over security policies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin's public cloud deployment facilitates versatile SaaS integration, but post-acquisition customer support experiences vary. Microsoft Entra ID Governance offers hybrid deployment capabilities, effectively blending on-premises and cloud services. Customer support is generally positive, although there are some challenges with support responsiveness as noted with OneLogin.

Pricing and ROI: OneLogin attracts cost-conscious organizations with competitive pricing and user-based licensing beneficial for scalability, although opinions on post-renewal price increases differ. Reports indicate strong ROI due to reduced IT workload and quicker onboarding. Microsoft Entra ID Governance offers competitive licensing for Office 365 users, though additional licensing like a P2 license may be needed for full capabilities, potentially affecting costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. OneLogin Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. OneLogin

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OneLogin

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), User Provisioning Software (5th), Identity Management (IM) (6th), Access Management (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is 3.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OneLogin is 2.6%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OneLogin	2.6%
Microsoft Entra ID Governance	3.2%
Other	94.2%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Jason Givens

Lead Cloud Systems Architect at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Access reviews and lifecycle policies have streamlined privileged account oversight and onboarding automation

I am not using the access review agent feature in Microsoft Entra ID Governance because that is in preview right now, and I do not know if that is available. My perception of Microsoft Entra ID Governance's ability to handle large volumes of users access and management tasks is good. There is a slight delay from creation of the actual access review to how long it takes to complete the actual review. For us, we are a large organization with over ten thousand employees. If we are doing a review on a larger group that has thousands of employees inside of it, it takes a while to actually complete, and then it becomes a headache for managers. If there were a way to condense that or decrease the amount of time it takes to do it, that would be better. We inspect thousands of people. Microsoft Entra ID Governance can be improved, and I actually have two tickets in with you now about improvements. I would have to dig it up because I do not know off the top of my head, but you can find it. We have two tickets that have been put in by the FastTrack team that I work with for identity governance. I think it was something about the ability to stop reviews early. When you create an access review now, and you put a time gate on it, say it is the end of this week, once the access review is finished, the managers went in there and finished the access review, you cannot finish it until the end of the week. That is a slight problem because we do not get a notification for people that are on the identity side that they have actually finished that, and I think there are two tickets in for that right now.

Read full review

Amit Rathod

Senior Analyst - IDAM at Toll Holdings Limited

Unified sign-in has simplified access control and has supported end-to-end identity lifecycle

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests. Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Regarding Microsoft Entra ID Governance integration with Microsoft services, there is automated identity lifecycle management in the product."

"The most valuable features are multifactor authentication and account creation for the Exchange environment in Office 365."

"I am very happy with the solution."

"The solution gives me the capability to automatically move guest accounts from the tenant without any manual intervention."

"The platform's most valuable feature is the single sign-on service."

"The product's most valuable features are the robust audit trail capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance for identity management is multi-factor authentication."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance pros

"OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by helping reduce issues and save time."

"OneLogin is a great password management solution that adds security to all our business applications and consolidates password management, saving time and costs."

"Simplicity is the most valuable part of OneLogin."

"Specifically, we have seen enhanced security with OneLogin, an increase in overall security of fifty percent compared to our previous solution, and time saved since we can access all our apps within OneLogin using one password."

"OneLogin has positively impacted us in many different ways, particularly in terms of cost, as our costs have been reduced compared to what we have been spending."

"The best feature of OneLogin is the mapping feature, which stands out as the most beneficial, as the mapping works better in OneLogin, allowing me to sync users from Google Group to OneLogin role, which is crucial for role access for end users and new service requests."

"Ease of integration with AD."

"Overall it has resulted in a highly productive IT services organization."

More OneLogin pros

Cons

"If you want to conduct access review of database-based applications, then you cannot do that."

"There is a slight delay from creation of the actual access review to how long it takes to complete the actual review. For us, we are a large organization with over ten thousand employees... it takes a while to actually complete, and then it becomes a headache for managers."

"Microsoft has done a commendable job with RPAX. However, Microsoft should prioritize enhancing its ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) capabilities. Currently, Microsoft's ABAC offering falls behind AWS in comparison."

"If you want to conduct access review of database-based applications, then you cannot do that."

"The product's workflow approval process needs improvement."

"Bridging between on-premises and cloud services has the potential for improvement. For instance, it would be beneficial to be able to synchronize traditional directory schemas with Azure. I need to maintain an on-premises Active Directory server for certain required services."

"Sometimes, the solution is not super reliable."

"One area for improvement in Microsoft Entra ID Governance could be providing more granular control over security policies."

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance cons

"Performance is lacking sometimes and having a RESTful implementation instead of RPC would have been more desirable."

"Customer support is very poor."

"As of now, I have not seen a return on investment."

"The only downside I see with OneLogin is that there are some limitations with using the apps provisioning APIs that can lead to some termination or provisioning action not being completed."

"The solution keeps going down for many hours, which impacts the entire company. You can't access any applications. OneLogin Desktop has a huge problem where it locks your computers and you need to reset the whole computer, which is pretty insane."

"This product doesn't necessarily provide us with all of the functionality that we need, such as being able to share passwords with external users."

"The tool must be made more robust."

"OneLogin could be improved with simpler user management features, though the current interface is relatively straightforward to use."

More OneLogin cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While other products give the pricing for their application, Microsoft Entra ID Governance has a per-user-based license model."

"There are no additional costs besides the standard licensing fees."

"The solution's pricing is not low but reasonable."

"In the education sector where I work, the annual cost for my Google and Microsoft environments is approximately $35,000. This covers the needs of 3,400 students and 800 faculty and staff members."

"It was cheap in the beginning, and then it became very expensive. We were initially charged $2 per user per month, which was fine, but by the second year, they increased it to $5 per user. That became very expensive for us because we had about 1,500 users. At $2 per user, it comes out to be $3,000 a month, which is $36,000 a year. If we move to $5 per user, it comes out to be $7,500 a month. That made its cost so high. That is why we removed the product because the cost was high."

"The price of the licensing is fine."

"Surprisingly expensive given the price of on-premise solutions."

"OneLogin's pricing, from the perspective of the education sector, seems quite reasonable for the value it delivers."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. It is much cheaper than other products."

"While I wish OneLogin's pricing was more affordable, their licensing model, which is based on per user, is acceptable."

"The pricing for OneLogin seems to be okay. The pricing and licensing are affordable. If you'd consider OneLogin to be expensive, it's worth it."

"We were happy with the price we got when we signed up, but I don't know what will happen when the time comes to renew because it is a different company now. We haven't seen any pricing models or had that discussion yet. My renewal is a year and a half away. It's worth what we're paying for it. There's no way we could provide the level of service for cheaper or try to do the same in-house."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

University

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Entra ID Governance is access reviews.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

My main use cases for Microsoft Entra ID Governance are access reviews, but specifically Privileged Identity Management access reviews. I am utilizing the user-centric access reviews in Microsoft E...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OneLogin by One Identity?

The areas of OneLogin that have room for improvement include that AI is not for me. There are tools where AI does not belong, in my opinion, and this is one of them. I don't see any benefits of hav...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OneLogin by One Identity?

OneLogin's use case in my organization is for the entire infrastructure because it was very outdated, not secure, and it was built Windows heavy despite us being a Mac environment. I decided to go ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OneLogin by One Identity?

The advice I would give others looking to implement OneLogin is that there are a lot of tools out there. If this is something where the basic package fits for people or they need all those extra be...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 21% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 19% of the time

Netwrix Directory Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 18% of the time

Netwrix Identity Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 15% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Microsoft Entra ID Governance

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Governance Competitors

Okta Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 Platform vs OneLogin

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

LastPass Business vs OneLogin

Compared 5% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs OneLogin

Compared 4% of the time

More OneLogin Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance

March 2026

Download Microsoft Entra ID Governance product report

Buyer's Guide

OneLogin

March 2026

Download OneLogin product report

Also Known As

No data available

OneLogin Workforce Identity

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID Governance empowers organizations with advanced identity management, security enforcement, and seamless access management across environments, offering robust multi-factor authentication and audit capabilities.

Microsoft Entra ID Governance provides comprehensive identity and security management through features like single sign-on and privileged identity management. It enhances user management with user behavior analytics, entitlement management, and access reviews while integrating on-premises solutions with cloud services like Office 365. By ensuring secure access and resource protection within Azure, organizations manage access, automate user access rules, and govern external identities effectively.

What features make Microsoft Entra ID Governance stand out?

Audit Trail Capabilities: Thorough tracking for security compliance.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Enhanced protection across platforms.
Single Sign-On: Efficient management across different systems.
Privileged Identity Management: Control just-in-time access with analytics.
Entitlement Management: Automate guest account management.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of Microsoft Entra ID Governance?

Enhanced Security: Strong authentication and auditing for secure environments.
Efficient User Management: Streamlined access processes through SSO.
Unified Identity Solutions: Integration with cloud and on-premises platforms.
Automated Access Rules: Reduced manual oversight with automation.

Financial services utilize Microsoft Entra ID Governance to protect sensitive data while automating user access rules and managing compliance. In education, it facilitates user account management and access provisioning for students and faculty, ensuring secure collaboration through Exchange and Teams.

Microsoft

OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.

Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.

What are the key features of OneLogin?

Single Sign-On: Provides centralized access to applications.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security with multiple verification steps.
Self-Service Password Resets: Empowers users to manage their passwords.
Ease of Integration: Connects seamlessly with cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits can users expect?

Improved Time Management: Streamlines user access processes.
Reduced Security Incidents: Strengthens authentication measures.
Efficient Interface: Facilitates smooth user navigation.
Enhanced Remote Work: Supports flexible workforce needs.

Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

OneLogin has thousands of customers across multiple industries and from around the globe such as Uber, Airbnb, Noom, Petco, Sony, Lucky Brand, Tesco, Airbus, Japan Airlines, Aetna, Compass, Kaplan, Susan G. Komen, AAA and PennyMac.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. OneLogin

March 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. OneLogin

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. OneLogin and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID Governance vs. OneLogin report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.