Imprivata OneSign vs Microsoft Entra ID comparison

Imprivata and Microsoft are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Imprivata is ranked #18, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. Imprivata holds a 2.1% mindshare in SSO, compared to Microsoft’s 27.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imprivata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Imprivata OneSign

Read 3 Imprivata OneSign reviews

872 Views
468 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 234 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

8,667 Views
6,558 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Imprivata OneSign

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Imprivata OneSign and Microsoft Entra ID are both prominent solutions in identity and access management. Microsoft Entra ID seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and integration capabilities favored by user reviews.

Features: Imprivata OneSign offers efficient single sign-on (SSO), authentication management, and strong support, particularly effective in healthcare environments. Microsoft Entra ID is noted for advanced identity governance, comprehensive security features, and broader functionalities beneficial for larger enterprises.

Room for Improvement: Imprivata OneSign users suggest enhancements in scalability, reporting capabilities, and integration with a variety of systems. Microsoft Entra ID users request better customer support, more intuitive integration processes, and improved documentation for deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imprivata OneSign is praised for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Microsoft Entra ID provides extensive guidance and support documentation but faces criticism for its complexity during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Imprivata OneSign is perceived as cost-effective with a quick return on investment, especially in specialized sectors like healthcare. Microsoft Entra ID, while more expensive, is seen as valuable for its robust features and integration, delivering substantial ROI through enhanced security and functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Imprivata OneSign

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

234

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (1st), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Imprivata OneSign is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 27.2%, up from 25.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Iszaini Sejet

Finance & Admin at a pharma/biotech company with 1-10 employees

Positive impact on password management through AI-powered single sign-on

The best features of Imprivata OneSign include the single sign-on with its own AI, meaning that customers don't have to modify their coding. The AI remembers the password and login, so when users enter the system, the AI will input the login and password automatically. The beauty of Imprivata OneSign is that it can use single sign-on with legacy systems such as mainframe terminal products. Most of the latest single sign-on solutions cannot use mainframe systems. Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security.

Read full review

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."

"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."

"Imprivata OneSign helps customers minimize their work in remembering passwords and enhances their security."

"The scalability capabilities are quite high."

"My two preferred features are conditional access and privileged identity management."

"After implementing Microsoft Entra ID, secure access to apps has become seamless."

"It's something we have to deal with every day. It is present. If you're in a domain environment, you'll need it to log in. If you work in a Microsoft-centric environment, you can't avoid it."

"We do not have to deploy lots of machines all over the place to run things as a service, which is how we like to deploy things, just as a service."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."

"Many of its features are valuable, including: facilitating application authentication, privileged access management, processes for attestation, and access reviews."

"Microsoft Entra ID has streamlined and centralized our device management and threat response processes."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"They should have a landing page."

"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."

"Imprivata OneSign should have a landing page because most customers prefer this feature, which is currently a strong point for competitors."

"The visibility in the GUI is not good for management. There are a lot of improvements that could make it better. It should be more user-friendly overall. It is not user-friendly because everything keeps changing on the platform. I can understand it because I know the platform, am familiar with it, and use it every day. However, for a lot of clients, they don't use it every day or are not familiar with it, so it should be more user friendly."

"It could be better if a simple member could understand more easily the prices of the products and packages offered by Microsoft."

"Entra ID is not battle-tested or stable enough to support a business of our size. There are some design issues specifically around support for legacy services."

"When you fix the rules and permissions, working directly on the manifest, you really need to have in-depth knowledge. If there were a graphical user interface to update the manifest, that would be good."

"When it comes to identity and access life cycle management for applications that are run on-premises, as well as access governance, if those kinds of capabilities could be built into Azure Active Directory, that would be good."

"There have been a couple of outages so that I would rate the stability around a seven out of 10."

"The Cloud Provisioning Agent cannot provision a lot of the information that AD Connect does. For starters, the lightweight version cannot synchronize device information. If you have computers on-premises, the information about them will not be synchronized by the Cloud Provisioning Agent. In addition, if you have a user on the cloud and he changes his password, that information should be written back to the on-premises instance. But that workflow cannot be done with the lightweight agent. It can only be done with the more robust version."

"Microsoft should work on enhancing its machine-learning algorithm to prevent unnecessary lockouts of users."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At the moment, I believe the price is reasonable."

"The price is reasonable, it's an affordable solution."

"The solution costs us 60,000 Rupees annually, just over $700, and there are no additional costs."

"It is not too expensive."

"We got a good deal. If you get rid of all the products providing features that Azure Suite can provide, then it makes sense cost-wise."

"We have a yearly license."

"Compared to other Microsoft products, the cost is not too expensive. There's a free tier available, though it doesn't include all features. Overall, it's well-priced."

"The licensing model is straightforward. I don't think there are any issues with the E3 license or E5 license."

"I'd recommend Azure Active Directory if you are a big company. For small or medium companies, it's probably not the best idea in the world because of the pricing. If you are a small company, you can probably deploy your own solutions because you're not handling a website with tons of traffic. If you are not like Adidas, Nike, or Walmart, you can do it in a way that is more localized than handling everything through a big price solution. However, Azure tends to provide you with solutions that are easier to use. If it was cheaper, I'd definitely recommend going for it."

"The price of the solution was reasonable."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

28%

Healthcare Company

24%

Computer Software Company

Government

Educational Organization

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Regarding pricing, for the services we receive, it seems within the market range and about average.

See all answers

Comparisons

Okta Workforce Identity vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 10% of the time

Evidian Enterprise SSO vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

Keeper vs Imprivata OneSign

Compared 9% of the time

More Imprivata OneSign Competitors

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 10% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

April 2025

Download Imprivata OneSign product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

May 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

OneSign, Imprivata OneSign Authentication Management

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Imprivata

Microsoft

Overview

Imprivata OneSign delivers fast, secure no-click-access to the applications and information that care providers need, whenever and wherever they need it.

Security and regulatory compliance requirements mandate user authentication technology for accessing workstations and applications. As a result, care providers need to enter unique usernames and passwords (or PINs) for order signing, documentation signing, medication reconciliation and most other applications throughout their workflow. These laborious login requirements can disrupt clinical focus and obstruct patient care.

Imprivata

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

AZ Groeninge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Mahaska Health Partnership, Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Boulder Community Hospital, City of Marietta, Spencer Hospital, Southwest Washington Medical Center, South Shore Hospital

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID

April 2025

Free Report: Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID

Find out what your peers are saying about Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.