Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Infor dEPM vs KiSSFLOW comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infor dEPM
Ranking in Business Performance Management
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
KiSSFLOW
Ranking in Business Performance Management
24th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), Rapid Application Development Software (28th), Low-Code Development Platforms (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Business Performance Management category, the mindshare of Infor dEPM is 3.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KiSSFLOW is 2.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Performance Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Infor dEPM3.1%
KiSSFLOW2.0%
Other94.9%
Business Performance Management
 

Featured Reviews

Dietmar Müller - PeerSpot reviewer
Key Account Manager at Cronon GmbH
Customizable features streamline installation and integration challenges remain
Our company is a partner of Infor in Germany. We mainly use Infor DEPM for finance solutions Infor DEPM has features that are well-prepared by Infor. I do not need to have my own tools; I only need to customize many elements. This makes it easier to install and work with. With the prepared…
Julius Jagdon - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Tools at Motorola Solutions
The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver
When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user. For example, our RSN needs to approve the ticket first before it's moved to the next person rather than having them all grouped. It would be better if we could see all the tickets grouped at the same time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Infor dEPM's got the best end-user reporting solution that keeps us motivated and moving forward with this solution only."
"Integration with other software applications is so user friendly and also it's a single ledger designed system."
"All our customers have experienced a return on investment, as they have been included on the list of calls."
"The robustness of the Infocubes, and the possibility of integrating both strong data analysis characteristics with pleasant aesthetic features."
"The planning capability is the most valuable feature."
"This is a perfect, secure, safe and fast product."
"It was useful for consolidating data from subsidiaries and having global reports."
"Our customers have the solution deployed on the cloud or on-premises. The deployment took about a month."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The support team responds fast."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
 

Cons

"Flexibility to modify an existing Infocube, and better integration with other ETL tools on the market."
"Only sometimes, there are server start-up issues."
"The Inventory module is not so strong when compared with the other software applications in its category!"
"The latest version has been cloud-enabled, but it requires a deeper understanding of programming skills compared to the previous versions, which were more user-friendly."
"A web-based version would provide greater usability and I believe is still in the development pipeline."
"The bigger the database with accelerators the more unstable it is, but without accelerators the model would not run."
"The initial setup from a user perspective can be cumbersome and has room for improvement."
"However, I found it buggy, clunky, and very stiff."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive."
"It's a very expensive product, and I would rate it at nine out of ten, with ten being the most expensive. There are yearly licensing costs."
"While the licensing cost of Infor dEPM may be costly, it is still more affordable than SAP BusinessObjects EPM, for example."
"The product costs $15 per user per month."
"Kissflow's licensing cost is lower than other products. However, the contract has changed with the second version they have given us, which is the low-code one."
"This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription."
"The license is very expensive."
"Your company must subscribe to the solution if you create a business account."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Performance Management solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Retailer
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Performing Arts
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor dEPM?
From my perspective, I think Infor dEPM is a good solution for clients who want to deep dive into data analysis in finance, but it may be complicated. The user cannot make decisions independently a...
What is your primary use case for Infor dEPM?
With Infor dEPM, I usually recommend it for finance, insurance companies, oil and gas companies, and hospitality industries. I have one client in education who currently wants to deploy Infor dEPM ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Infor Dynamic Enterprise Performance Management, Infor PM
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DAB Group
KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.
Find out what your peers are saying about Infor dEPM vs. KiSSFLOW and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.