

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform compete in the software development lifecycle category. JFrog seems to have the upper hand with its wide-ranging features suited for modern DevOps environments, while OpenText focuses on security testing.
Features: OpenText offers robust security testing elements, integration capabilities, and automation for security processes. JFrog provides support for continuous integration and deployment, artifact management, and container security.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers a secure and structured deployment process with support focused on security. JFrog provides an agile deployment experience with support facilitating the integration of DevOps tools.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText has a higher upfront cost, offering return in scenarios demanding security compliance. JFrog provides competitive pricing reflecting its broad feature set, appealing to organizations prioritizing an all-in-one DevOps solution.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing | 7.1% |
| JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform | 3.7% |
| Other | 89.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.
This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.
What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.