Jira vs LiquidPlanner comparison

Atlassian and LiquidPlanner are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Atlassian is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while LiquidPlanner is ranked #29. Atlassian holds a 3.8% mindshare in PMS, compared to LiquidPlanner’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of LiquidPlanner users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 279 Jira reviews

14,524 Views
2,905 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

LiquidPlanner

Read 3 LiquidPlanner reviews

806 Views
653 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Jira

LiquidPlanner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Jira and LiquidPlanner are project management solutions that cater to different needs. LiquidPlanner seems to have the upper hand in features with advanced capabilities, making it worth its higher price.

Features: Jira offers extensive integrations, agile capabilities, and customizable dashboards appealing to software development teams prioritizing flexibility. LiquidPlanner provides predictive scheduling, advanced resource management, and more detailed planning tools, attracting teams looking for precision in complex project environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira allows flexible deployment options such as cloud or on-premises setups and has comprehensive support, including documentation and a large community. LiquidPlanner, being a cloud-based solution, emphasizes straightforward deployment along with dedicated customer support, ensuring smoother adoption for specific teams.

Pricing and ROI: Jira offers a lower setup cost with a straightforward pricing model, making it cost-effective for large teams focusing on scalable project management. LiquidPlanner, though having a higher initial setup cost, is seen as delivering a greater ROI due to its advanced project estimates and resource allocation, justifying its investment for teams needing detailed planning and predictability.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. LiquidPlanner Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Project Management Software

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

279

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd)

LiquidPlanner

Ranking in Project Management Software

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Jira is 3.8%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Jira	3.8%
LiquidPlanner	1.2%
Other	95.0%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

Paul Gruver

Sr. Project Manager at Stradley Ronon

Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management

It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everything is tracked in one place."

"It benefits us because we have globally located teams. Our team members work in different geographies, so the product is a better way to manage progress and see the status of different tasks"

"The solution is easy to use and user-friendly."

"The way it interfaces with Bitbucket and other things like that is valuable. Reporting and being able to link various issues or stories together are also valuable. We call them stories, and they're general reports."

"The most valuable feature is that it is somewhat flexible."

"I found it super useful, as it is customizable for different teams and users."

"The most valuable feature of Jira is the project package for development."

"It is a stable solution, and we have had no issues with stability."

More Jira pros

"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."

Cons

"Something I do not like about the new version is that there is a need to browse all the way back to the beginning, should a person click on a task that is specifically for his group and wish to go back and look at the other portfolios or people."

"There could be an improvement in loading files and images for more than 50 MB. It would be good if it allowed more than 100 MB."

"The biggest complaint industry-wide about JIRA is they need to purchase additional extensions, such as reporting automation. If they could provide some additional extensions from the initial purchase it would be a huge benefit."

"Having more seamless integration with Confluence would really help us track our product management activity and other product details in one place."

"Lacks field-level permission in the cloud version."

"It is a bit harder for management or the business partners. I used to search the Atlassian Community online for some troubleshooting issues and I think there were some issues that seemed to not be a big problem for other similar applications, like Microsoft Teams, that were not considered by Jira."

"We would like to see the integration of a lite-version of Confluence, just to manage some of the templates and documents."

"The Jira dashboards could be more useful. The dashboards have good widgets but the comparison of data over time or extraction of trends from the data is not easy."

More Jira cons

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is yearly. It is a large, long-running program."

"The licensing cost for Jira is typically around seven dollars per user, though it may vary depending on regional variations. This cost is for a subscription-based model rather than a one-time purchase. I rate its pricing a seven out of ten."

"I don't have the number, but I sure wish Jira was less expensive. Its price point should be a little lower, and it should be more flexible for users who are just ticket viewers."

"It is subscription-based, and we probably pay yearly. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of price."

"There are no additional costs to the standard licensing."

"It is an affordable tool."

"I understand JIRA is quite expensive."

"The cost is about $10 per user, per month."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	107
Midsize Enterprise	57
Large Enterprise	150

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 7% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 5% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Planview ProjectPlace vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 11% of the time

Smartsheet vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 10% of the time

Wrike vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 9% of the time

Procore Project Management vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 9% of the time

Planview Daptiv vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 5% of the time

More LiquidPlanner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

March 2026

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

March 2026

Download LiquidPlanner product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

No data available

Overview

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

Atlassian

LiquidPlanner is predictive, online project management for modern business. Our software enables people, teams and business leaders to plan, manage, collaborate and report on single projects, or an entire portfolio of projects, in real-time. LiquidPlanner’s award-winning and patent-pending predictive scheduling engine calculates project completion dates automatically based on three key factors; priority of work, the effort needed to compete the work, and resource availability. The LiquidPlanner scheduling engine uses this information in conjunction with sophisticated risk assessment modeling to accurately predict when work will be completed with 98 percent accuracy.

For more details visit our website

LiquidPlanner

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

March 2026

Free Report: Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. LiquidPlanner and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. LiquidPlanner report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.