Jira vs LiquidPlanner comparison

Atlassian and LiquidPlanner are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Atlassian is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while LiquidPlanner is ranked #29. Atlassian holds a 3.8% mindshare in PMS, compared to LiquidPlanner’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of LiquidPlanner users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 278 Jira reviews

13,931 Views
2,508 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

LiquidPlanner

Read 3 LiquidPlanner reviews

712 Views
577 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Jira

LiquidPlanner

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Jira and LiquidPlanner are project management solutions that cater to different needs. LiquidPlanner seems to have the upper hand in features with advanced capabilities, making it worth its higher price.

Features: Jira offers extensive integrations, agile capabilities, and customizable dashboards appealing to software development teams prioritizing flexibility. LiquidPlanner provides predictive scheduling, advanced resource management, and more detailed planning tools, attracting teams looking for precision in complex project environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira allows flexible deployment options such as cloud or on-premises setups and has comprehensive support, including documentation and a large community. LiquidPlanner, being a cloud-based solution, emphasizes straightforward deployment along with dedicated customer support, ensuring smoother adoption for specific teams.

Pricing and ROI: Jira offers a lower setup cost with a straightforward pricing model, making it cost-effective for large teams focusing on scalable project management. LiquidPlanner, though having a higher initial setup cost, is seen as delivering a greater ROI due to its advanced project estimates and resource allocation, justifying its investment for teams needing detailed planning and predictability.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. LiquidPlanner Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Project Management Software

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

278

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd)

LiquidPlanner

Ranking in Project Management Software

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Jira is 3.8%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jira	3.8%
LiquidPlanner	1.1%
Other	95.1%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Akhil Viswam

Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Agile workflows have streamlined sprint planning and tracking for faster feature delivery

Jira has a very good interface and it is very easy to manage sprints, tasks, and epics. The main feature is the hierarchy, as features can be converted into epics and topics, allowing bigger tasks to be partitioned into smaller ones. The hierarchy feature in Jira helps the team significantly compared to other tools that have been used, such as Trello, which is mainly useful only for a waterfall model. For modern Agile practices, Jira is the most adapted tool in the industry. Another valuable feature is that Jira APIs have been used for data science projects to analyze tasks and get insights. This has also been very helpful in the project.

Read full review

Paul Gruver

Sr. Project Manager at Stradley Ronon

Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management

It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features on offer are great. It has everything we need."

"With the help of Jira, tasks are less likely to remain stagnant for a long time. We always see them somewhere on the board."

"The most useful features are the Kanban dashboard, the ability to create tasks, bugs, epics with child issues, time estimation, and Jira reports."

"I like the test cases in Jira. The orange dash items view was great, and I like the features and layout of the data. It's quite different, and people are now getting their items so quickly."

"The configurable workflows and boards make it easy for us to execute and oversee our own unique process."

"It is very flexible, so we can do pretty much what we want with it."

"It provides very good visibility and traceability. You can clearly see each and every part of a process. It is also user-friendly and robust. It is working well, and there are a lot of add-ons or plug-ins out there that you can use."

"It gave us control over all test artifacts in one place, along with easy traceability, mapping between stories, bugs, test cases, and test cycles."

More Jira pros

"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable. We are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."

Cons

"They can maybe dumb down the directions for building the automation a little bit because to be able to build out the automation, I had to play around with it and learn what all the fields meant and what they were referencing. I don't have an IT background originally. My background is in biology, and I got into project management by chance. I am good at it, but I haven't really worked with coding languages. In terms of writing automation, it is easier for devs because they intuitively know what they're being asked, but as a PM who originally didn't have IT experience, it was a little bit daunting at first. It could also have an extra hierarchy to be able to allow tasks under stories. It could be the way it is set up at our organization, but currently, under stories, you can have sub-tasks, but you can't create a task. Being able to customize your hierarchy a little bit more would be beneficial because sometimes, the devs would say, "Well, here's a story, and now we need sub-tasks," but as we were building out the sub-tasks, sometimes we had to go a step lower to dig in a little bit more, and we couldn't do that."

"Sometimes, we create the same bug with two or three different Jira tickets in my company, which leads to duplication, making it an area where improvements are required."

"It's also difficult to migrate through, things don't always tie-up. It's not easy to use."

"Something I would like to see improved is the traceability feature. When you have a user story, if you can see all the test cases, it would be an improvement if you could see any design documents or any change management."

"End-to-end management from product backlog to test completion could be improved."

"A lot of the user interface could be updated."

"Lacks field-level permission in the cloud version."

"Although it covers the overall requirements and measurements, it'll help if they had their own test execution feature."

More Jira cons

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you get larger, the pricing becomes very, very steep."

"One of my customers told me that they were receiving better pricing for a similar tool from Microsoft."

"It is certainly a long-term solution for our company and for previous companies that I have worked for. They have these long-term term licenses, but I'm not sure if they really pay on a yearly basis. They are certainly using it for a really long period and for a lot of users."

"The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you."

"The price at the moment for Jira is okay. I'm absolutely not amused with the plans to try to drive us to the cloud or to other licensing models. For the very simple reason that we are a company in the defense sector where cloud is problematic in a number of the domains. We are now approximately 60 users and the new policy will actually confront us with an upscale to approximately 500 users. I find it unacceptable, and may potentially lead us to look for another solution."

"The pricing is much higher than other similar solutions available in the market, and as such, the vendor should think about a price reduction to make this product more affordable."

"We are a regional research and education institute. We're using the free license provided for educational institutes."

"We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	106
Midsize Enterprise	56
Large Enterprise	150

No data available

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

Jira itself is fairly priced for the features it provides, but pricing is a bit higher than some alternatives, mostly because many plugins and add-ons are paid and licensed per user. So even if onl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Jira

Compared 7% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 7% of the time

Asana vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Jira Competitors

Smartsheet vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 16% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 15% of the time

Procore Project Management vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 14% of the time

Planview ProjectPlace vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 13% of the time

More LiquidPlanner Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

January 2026

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

January 2026

Download LiquidPlanner product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

No data available

Overview

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

Atlassian

LiquidPlanner is predictive, online project management for modern business. Our software enables people, teams and business leaders to plan, manage, collaborate and report on single projects, or an entire portfolio of projects, in real-time. LiquidPlanner’s award-winning and patent-pending predictive scheduling engine calculates project completion dates automatically based on three key factors; priority of work, the effort needed to compete the work, and resource availability. The LiquidPlanner scheduling engine uses this information in conjunction with sophisticated risk assessment modeling to accurately predict when work will be completed with 98 percent accuracy.

For more details visit our website

LiquidPlanner

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

February 2026

Free Report: Jira vs. LiquidPlanner

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. LiquidPlanner and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. LiquidPlanner report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.