Juniper WLC Series vs Mojo Networks comparison

Juniper and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Juniper is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.5, while Arista is ranked #24. Juniper holds a 1.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Juniper WLC Series

Read 14 Juniper WLC Series reviews

1,859 Views
1,840 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

1,809 Views
1,773 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Juniper WLC Series

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Juniper WLC Series and Mojo Networks compete in the wireless network management category. Mojo Networks appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and cost-effectiveness, despite Juniper's established performance and scalability.

Features: Juniper WLC Series offers robust scalability, supporting up to 256 access points, high-speed connectivity, and the RingMaster management tool. Mojo Networks provides a cloud-based architecture, strong security features like wireless intrusion prevention system, and comprehensive analytics with Cognitive WiFi.

Room for Improvement: Juniper WLC Series needs better support for modern wireless standards like WPA3, improved traffic monitoring, and enhanced API capabilities. Its setup and compatibility with other products also require enhancement. Mojo Networks could improve by creating a more unified management portal and expanding its API functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Juniper WLC Series operates primarily on-premises, with mixed reviews indicating issues in technical support due to halted development. Mojo Networks uses a mix of deployment options, including cloud, and offers excellent customer service known for its responsiveness. Mojo's ease of setup is also noted positively compared to Juniper's complex deployment process.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper WLC Series is considered pricey but offers a good return on investment with reliable performance and cost benefits. Mojo Networks presents a more cost-effective option providing significant savings over competitors like Meraki. Users commend Mojo for its comprehensive features at competitive prices, highlighting its value for security and cost-efficiency-focused users.

To learn more, read our detailed Juniper WLC Series vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Juniper WLC Series vs. Mojo Networks

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Juniper WLC Series

Ranking in Wireless LAN

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

24th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Juniper WLC Series is 1.5%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Juniper WLC Series	1.5%
Mojo Networks	1.5%
Other	97.0%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Matilda Elwell

Technical Team Leader - Network &Security at STAFFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

Offers visibility and cost benefits

The tool has given us more visibility, but I'm not very technical, so I can't comment on specific features. However, the diagnostic tools for identifying system issues have greatly improved, which we appreciate. We still use Cisco ICE for authentication on the Juniper network, as we did before. We've seen cost benefits with the Juniper WLC Series, which was a key factor in our decision-making during the proof of concept. Besides cost improvements, we've also noticed better resolution of issues and faults in our help desk, thanks to the enhanced features.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer service is very good, and they have very experienced engineers on the site I worked on."

"The installation process is very easy."

"The tool has given us more visibility, but I'm not very technical, so I can't comment on specific features. However, the diagnostic tools for identifying system issues have greatly improved, which we appreciate. We still use Cisco ICE for authentication on the Juniper network, as we did before. We've seen cost benefits with the Juniper WLC Series, which was a key factor in our decision-making during the proof of concept. Besides cost improvements, we've also noticed better resolution of issues and faults in our help desk, thanks to the enhanced features."

"The AI integration with Marvis is very valuable."

"It is a very, very scalable solution and also has very, very good and very powerful programmability and open API interfaces."

"Its cloud machine has AI and machine learning, and therefore, it can help ensure IT has good monitoring and quicker response time as well as good troubleshooting capabilities."

"There weren't any scalability issues, the product did what it had to do."

"The installation process is nice and easy."

More Juniper WLC Series pros

"The technical support for the solution is very helpful."

"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."

"In summary, there is very little that can be improved with this product."

"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."

"The technical support is pretty good."

"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."

"The security is a valuable feature."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"Juniper WLC Series has certain shortcomings in traffic monitoring."

"There could be more information from the controller, and it could be easier to work with the controller lights. It's not easy to bring up the upgrades."

"There could be a high level of security."

"Juniper lacks a network access control agent similar to solutions like Alubakya Path and Cisco ISE."

"WLCv was a product at the being of its evolution, so there was room for improvement there."

"The support on offer to other vendors switching - like Aruba or Ruckus - could be improved."

"In my region, access to the product is very difficult and presents a logistical nightmare. Also, pricing is a big problem and a barrier to entry when selling Juniper against competitors."

"The biggest issue was that Juniper stopped developing, so we had to look for another solution."

More Juniper WLC Series cons

"The user interface needs improvement. It could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"My only complaint about this product is its availability. Not many people can stock it and ordering from overseas is a challenge."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"Something that could be improved is the ability to easily and quickly see what speed someone is on and if there are any issues on the network. We are using the older software technology, so maybe their newest version is able to do that."

"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The user interface needs improvement to make navigation even more simplistic."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost is quite high, but considering it's an enterprise solution, the complexity justifies the price."

"The product is relatively affordable for enterprise companies."

"Juniper WLC Series is a bit pricey but worth its cost."

"There is a certain amount that needs to be paid towards the licensing charges associated with the product, but though I am not sure, I feel the licenses that we have in our company are for three years."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"Pricing includes the planning tools, management, security, analytics, and advanced guest WiFi capabilities. It's always better to buy the longest term available for the best ROI. However, device will continue to function without valid cloud license."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"There are other solutions, like Ubiquiti, that have lowered their prices, which sometimes makes the argument to go with them. However, we do not bake in the WiFi for other vendors into our managed services, because they do not meet our standard offering."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Juniper WLC Series?

Juniper lacks a network access control agent similar to solutions like Alubakya Path and Cisco ISE. There should be a network access control engine. Some customers find it challenging as they do no...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Juniper WLC Series?

I work with Juniper service provider solutions. I have a service provider customer and some enterprise customers in retail.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Juniper WLC Series?

The overall solution is rated nine out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 21% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 18% of the time

Huawei Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 9% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 9% of the time

D-Link Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 3% of the time

More Juniper WLC Series Competitors

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Meraki MR Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAP vs Mojo Networks

Compared 6% of the time

SonicWall SonicWave Access Points vs Mojo Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Wireless LAN

July 2026

Download Juniper WLC Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

July 2026

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

Juniper WLAN

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Juniper WLC Series offers efficient setup with AI integration, ensuring network stability and scalability. Its advanced tools provide enhanced visibility and performance for corporate and large-scale deployments, integrating with Azure Active Directory for secure operations.

Juniper WLC Series is designed for enterprise Wi-Fi management, providing seamless wireless access across campus setups and other extensive environments. With support for multiple SSIDs and dynamic optimization via Marvis, it ensures optimal connectivity. The use of open APIs and robust programmability facilitates integration and customization, while cloud security features are bolstered by Azure Active Directory integration. Users benefit from cost savings through energy-efficient load balancing and prevention of unauthorized modifications. However, the high complexity and cost, combined with the need for enhanced compatibility with other products, pose challenges. Improvements are necessary in areas such as user interface development, portal functionality, WPA3 support, and API enrichment.

What are the most important features?

Seamless Installation: Quick setup processes for efficient deployment.
AI Integration: Enhanced with Marvis for intelligent optimization.
Network Visibility Tools: Advanced reporting and diagnostics.
Multiple SSIDs Support: Facilitates diverse network configurations.
Open API: Allows custom integrations and programmability.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

High Performance: Ensures stable and robust connectivity.
Cloud Security: Integrates with Azure Active Directory.
Cost Savings: Efficient load balancing and energy usage.
Infrastructure Consistency: Templates help reduce risks and errors.

Juniper WLC Series is deployed in enterprises, educational institutions, and public sectors, enhancing Wi-Fi management from single access points to extensive campus infrastructures. Ideal for corporate connectivity and supporting large user bases, it plays a critical role in environments lacking prior wireless options.

Juniper

Mojo Networks delivers cloud-based architecture focusing on control, visibility, security, and reliability, with support for high-density WiFi requirements and seamless integration for expanded network environments.

Mojo Networks is renowned for its cloud-based architecture, providing robust control and visibility with strong security features like WIPS. Its autonomous capabilities and adaptive analytics, such as Cognitive WiFi, add significant value by ensuring effective guest WiFi management and diagnostics. Its intuitive installation and automated configuration facilitate network expansions, further enhancing the user experience with a mesh network. Strong security means and cost efficiency set Mojo Networks apart in the competitive market space.

What are the standout features?

Cloud-Based Architecture: Integrated system offering control and visibility.
WIPS Security: Offers enhanced wireless security features.
Cognitive WiFi: Advanced analytics for network optimization.
Autonomous Capabilities: Simplifies management with automation.
Mesh Network: Guarantees seamless connectivity.

What should users look for in reviews?

Ease of Use: Simple installation and configuration process.
Scalability: Facilitates easy network expansion.
Reliability: Stable performance in high-density environments.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing across regions.
Security: Comprehensive protection against threats.

Mojo Networks is prevalent in public WiFi infrastructure and corporate guest WiFi across offices, schools, and restaurants. Its cloud-managed feature supports robust managed WiFi offerings, popularly deployed in educational institutions to ensure a secure distributed wireless environment. Businesses value its ease of management and security features with widespread application across many sectors.

Arista

Sample Customers

Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BAS Group, Borealis, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Jan Yperman Hospital, Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, MercaSID, S.A., NHTV Breda University, Parklands College and Christopher Robin Pre-Primary, San Antonio Community Hospital, Sandia National Laboratories, Springfield Public Schools (SPS), St. Catherine University, TalkTalk, The Education Village, University of Copenhagen, University of the Highlands and Islands, University of the West of Scotland (UWS), Valdosta State University, Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec), zulily

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Juniper WLC Series vs. Mojo Networks

June 2026

Free Report: Juniper WLC Series vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper WLC Series vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Juniper WLC Series vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.