


Microsoft Defender for Cloud and JupiterOne compete in cloud security. Microsoft Defender generally has an edge in pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers, while JupiterOne is favored for superior functionality.
Features: Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers threat protection, integrates with Microsoft services, and provides a security solution for Microsoft users. JupiterOne provides asset visibility, compliance monitoring, and integration capabilities, offering insights across environments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender benefits from integration with Microsoft solutions, easing deployment for its users, supported by Microsoft’s infrastructure. JupiterOne offers cloud-native deployment, integrating with different IT environments and supported by knowledgeable service.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender has competitive setup costs, especially when bundled with Microsoft services, offering strong ROI for its users. JupiterOne's higher pricing is offset by its feature set value, providing greater security and compliance management.
We are able to scan all our assets with less human intervention and achieve overall effective outcomes.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
After implementation, that dropped to about three to four hours, saving nearly eighty percent of manual effort in that area.
With JupiterOne, I have reduced the number of employees needed due to increased automation, which has also led to significant cost savings.
Using JupiterOne has helped me reduce my total time by almost twenty percent.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
Compared to not having Microsoft Defender for Cloud in place, we definitely saw an advantage by not having downtime due to a security threat.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
Their team provided dedicated assistance for connecting integrations like AWS and GitHub, which made the first two to three weeks much smoother than expected.
Customer support for JupiterOne is good, and I find it quite strong, especially for enterprise use.
Customer support is responsive, typically answering within less than twenty-four hours of when I ask a question.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
It handles diverse daily data, supports multi-cloud environments, and accommodates thousands of users and applications.
Our organization has grown from a few cloud resource accounts to hundreds of accounts and thousands of resources without needing to deploy additional JupiterOne infrastructure.
The scalability of JupiterOne is quite good. It is built to handle enterprise-scale infrastructures with thousands of assets across multiple cloud environments.
As we have reduced our on-premises infrastructure, it is about how we can migrate workloads to the cloud to make it easier, and then having everything fully encompassed and secured within that area makes it much easier for us to scale as needed and grow.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It has a lot of scanning mechanisms, which are agentless APIs, eBPF, and cloud agents, that are highly reliable.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
I have not experienced any crashes or downtime.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
Skills development is another important area that needs attention, as teams require training in graph-based query language to effectively handle large transaction datasets.
The unified devices feature is valuable and did not used to exist, and it has been fantastic.
JupiterOne is very good when compared to other cloud asset platforms overall.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
Overall, it is not cheap, but for what it does, it is a good value.
Security has essentially no cost when compared to the cost of a breach.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
The key feature I rely on most in my daily work is the graph-based asset relationship mapping JupiterOne provides.
The ease of using queries and the new MCP feature has helped me because sometimes I would have difficulty writing the queries, but the AI within the query field in JupiterOne suggests if the query is incorrect and proposes a new query.
One of the best features JupiterOne offers is blast radius, being able to see assets that could be directly or indirectly affected by any cyber incident or to see how some assets communicate with other assets and some do not communicate with other assets.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Defender for Cloud | 2.5% |
| Qualys TotalCloud | 1.2% |
| JupiterOne | 0.5% |
| Other | 95.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 31 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 49 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
JupiterOne offers a comprehensive platform designed for cybersecurity asset management, providing streamlined solutions for security and compliance. Experts appreciate its capability to increase visibility across cloud environments.
JupiterOne simplifies asset management by integrating with multiple tools and frameworks, enabling organizations to gain insights into their security posture. It supports continuous monitoring and instant analysis, enhancing risk management and compliance reporting. By centralizing information, it reduces manual efforts, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
What are JupiterOne's key features?In healthcare, JupiterOne helps manage sensitive data compliance and security, while financial services benefit from its robust compliance reporting features. Technology companies use its automation capabilities to enhance cloud asset management, providing a scalable backbone for growth and security alignment.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security platform offering integration with Microsoft services, multi-cloud capability, AI-driven threat detection, compliance, and unified visibility for improved security operations.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud manages security operations by integrating with Microsoft services and supporting multi-cloud environments. Its features include AI-driven threat detection, compliance oversight, and advanced threat protection. It simplifies processes with unified visibility, threat intelligence, and automated workflows, enhancing security posture across various workloads. Despite its robust capabilities, improvements are needed in third-party tool integration, comprehensive AI-driven remediation, and a more intuitive dashboard. Users report complexity in licensing, inadequate documentation, and high costs, with room for enhancements in compliance reporting and multi-cloud support.
What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Cloud?Industries leverage Microsoft Defender for Cloud for security posture management and endpoint protection. Many companies integrate it with Office 365 for enhanced functionality. It provides comprehensive security overviews by monitoring cloud vulnerabilities, limiting unauthorized access, and replacing existing tools with its extensive capabilities from network security to compliance checks, securing Azure infrastructure, and enhancing client security.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.