Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection comparison

Kaspersky and Mimecast are both solutions in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category. Kaspersky is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.7, while Mimecast is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Kaspersky holds a 2.2% mindshare in SEG, compared to Mimecast’s 17.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kaspersky users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Read 8 Kaspersky Security for Mail Server reviews

978 Views
372 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mimecast Email and Collabor...

Read 39 Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection reviews

6,951 Views
2,224 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Mimecast Email and Collabor...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 11, 2026

Mimecast Advanced Email Security and Kaspersky Security for Mail Server compete in the email security category. Mimecast is preferred for its advanced features, while Kaspersky is appreciated for its cost-effectiveness.

Features: Mimecast Advanced Email Security includes sandboxing, spam filtering, and link inspection. The solution is noted for its stability, scalability, and robust technical support. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is recognized for reliable spam and phishing management, seamless integration with platforms like Fortinet, and cost-effectiveness.

Room for Improvement: Users seek Mimecast improvements in support response times, phishing email filtering, and more affordable data extraction options. Kaspersky could enhance customization features, encrypted attachment monitoring, and simplify license renewal procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast supports versatile deployment options, including public and hybrid cloud. However, technical support can be sluggish. Kaspersky's deployment is typically on-premises or hybrid, with users satisfied with its responsive technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast is considered premium, offering high ROI with advanced features despite its criticized pricing. Kaspersky is seen as more affordable, providing excellent value with competitive pricing compared to other solutions such as Barracuda.

To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Security for Mail...

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

10th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (27th)

Mimecast Email and Collabor...

Ranking in Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Archiving (2nd), Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (19th), Office 365 Protection (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Secure Email Gateway (SEG) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection is 17.1%, up from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection	17.1%
Kaspersky Security for Mail Server	2.2%
Other	80.7%

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Featured Reviews

KamranBhatti

Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Provides reliable real-time email protection and offers competitive pricing features

Regarding Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, I have not compared with other solutions, but I will compare and provide feedback. It is a reliable and fast security solution, and I can say it blocks better than other competitor software. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server has support for Windows and Linux, but regarding improvement, I have to dig deep and will have to do research on that. I have not checked into much detail about what can be better in Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. I have checked in general. If given some time, I can check and compare with other solutions. Regarding Kaspersky Security for Mail Server, I have found this is quite a good solution. It has a good response and good detection capability. I have not checked other products, so I cannot give any detailed or specific feedback regarding that. From what I have checked from Kaspersky mail security, it is satisfactory.

Read full review

Test Logix

Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity

Experience high detection and user-friendly policies with reliable email security implementation

The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary. As an IT engineer, I understand how it works, but explaining it to another IT person can be difficult. Having more user-friendly dashboards would improve the work experience. In Mimecast Email Security, checking policies in the dictionary or gateway is very complicated, and not everyone understands this process. If you examine the Check Point portal, it's user-friendly with easily accessible tabs that anyone can explore. With Mimecast Email Security, making changes might impact existing mailboxes. The portal is complicated compared to Check Point's user-friendly interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can install the plugins on the same machine hosting your exchange solution. It's a good complement for Sophos security, which scans the traffic before it reaches your mail service. Kaspersky is on the mail server itself while Sophos handles the incoming traffic. With both of them working together, we have the perfect solution for mail."

"I find the product valuable because it provides easy integration with other platforms like Fortinet firewalls."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution."

"The primary use case of this solution is to filter emails and only allow the legitimate ones through."

"The most valuable features are the anti-phishing and anti-spam capabilities."

"The integration rate is very high in Kaspersky, which is why most of our customers like it."

"We have achieved cost savings of up to thirty percent by using Kaspersky Security for Mail Server."

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server pros

"The solution is stable and reliable; there are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."

"Mimecast certainly helped my customers reduce phishing emails."

"The solution's performance is good."

"Mimecast Mailbox Community is an email gateway required for every organization, regardless of size."

"Mimecast has some good support services in place."

"My advice to those considering this product would be to go for it."

"The reviewer gave Mimecast Email Security a rating of 10 out of 10."

"It is our spam filter, phishing filter, and executive impersonation filter."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pros

Cons

"It would be great if Kaspersky could do what Sophos does for us. However, we love having these two different technologies doing the same thing. Sometimes Sophos has the patch to block a novel threat, but Kaspersky doesn't."

"I rated the overall solution a five out of ten. If a user is looking for a low-budget solution with mid-level security without AI features, Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is suitable."

"The solution is not 100 percent stable and that can use improvement."

"Encrypted email attachments are not being monitored by this solution, which is an area that they need to work on."

"Sometimes Sophos has the patch to block a novel threat, but Kaspersky doesn't."

"Encrypted email attachments are not being monitored by this solution, which is an area that they need to work on."

"Kaspersky lacks in the area of customization, so simpler customization options need to be provided to users."

"I have only made contact via email, and it is a little slow. I would give customer service a rating of six or seven. Improving Spanish support would greatly benefit users."

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server cons

"As a user, the user interface of the management console could be upgraded, for example."

"Mimecast need to ensure that the body text format is correctly handled and that images are properly embedded in the body text."

"It was not a good experience due to the fact that our main infrastructure had a problem for that entire time."

"The interface and the documentation could be improved. They can also include some more training resources and content like video. While setting things up, I had to search for the information quite a bit. It took me time to find the correct way to do something. The information is there, but it is sort of all over the place. They can create a better help knowledge base or help portal. It retains your email for 45 days. They can maybe increase this duration."

"The differentiation between bulk spam mail and campaign-related mail could be improved."

"Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competition in the Indian market, and the local presence is lacking as they do not have a local representative currently."

"The price could be better, it should be reduced."

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a bit expensive."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution offers one of the best prices possible to its users, making it even better than Barracuda. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ten times cheaper than Barracuda."

"Price-wise, I would rate this product a four out of five. It could be a bit cheaper."

"The solution is not expensive."

"My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution."

"Compared to the other solutions in the market, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection's pricing is fine."

"Two subscription options are currently offered: monthly and yearly. My suggestion is to opt for the yearly subscription as it can give some discount. The pricing isn't high as other cloud solutions are pricier than Microsoft's offerings."

"Compared to the other products in the market, it is neither cheap but nor very expensive. I would rate it somewhere in the middle, 5 out of 10."

"For what it is, the product is overpriced."

"Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."

"It is a bit expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a ten."

"The product price is moderate. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Retailer

10%

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

The pricing is moderate. It is not expensive but not cheap either. For Mexico, a good price is about 20 dollars per agent.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kaspersky Security for Mail Server?

I work on a mail protection service, specifically Kaspersky Security for Mail Server. I work with Kaspersky Security for Mail Server.

See all answers

What do you like most about Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 12% of the time

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiMail vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 9% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Kaspersky Security for Mail Server

Compared 5% of the time

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Competitors

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 19% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Email Security

February 2026

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server report

Download Kaspersky Security for Mail Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

March 2026

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection report

Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Mimecast Web Security, Mimecast Mailbox Continuity, Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Overview

Email is the number one vector used by cybercriminals to penetrate and attack enterprise IT systems.

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server uses Next Generation technologies including advanced heuristics, machine learning and sandboxing to detect and protect against ransomware, spam, phishing, data loss and even unknown threats penetrating your IT systems through emails and malicious attachments.

Kaspersky

Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers advanced features like sandboxing, email archiving, and phishing protection. It's known for integration with Microsoft 365 and user-friendly admin management, making it a robust choice for secure communications.

Focused on safeguarding emails, Mimecast Advanced Email Security integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, providing features such as sandboxing, spam filtering, and email archiving. It delivers comprehensive protection against phishing, identity threats, and impersonation attempts. Administrators benefit from the ability to monitor external communications and customize configurations, enhancing email security. Users appreciate the intuitive admin console and responsive support team. Although it faces challenges in threat detection rates and administration complexity, its capabilities in email monitoring, spam filtering, and URL inspection remain valued by enterprises seeking reliable email security that supports compliance needs.

What key features should users explore?

Sandboxing: Analyzes attachments in a secure environment to detect threats.
Email Archiving: Provides secure long-term storage of emails for compliance.
Spam Filtering: Prevents unsolicited emails from clogging the inbox.
URL Inspection: Checks links in emails for malicious content.
Phishing Protection: Guards against deceptive tactics to protect sensitive data.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Regulatory Compliance: Facilitates adherence to standards such as HIPAA.
Integration: Enhances existing systems with seamless Microsoft 365 integration.
Support: Offers a responsive support team to resolve issues promptly.
Email Security: Improves threat prevention with effective spam and phishing protections.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is implemented across industries to protect against email threats like phishing, spam, and malicious attachments. It serves as both a gateway and an archiving tool, supporting compliance in healthcare and finance by offering features like URL protection and data loss prevention. Enterprises leverage its capabilities to secure inbound and outbound communications effectively.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

Vimpel Com, Estrella Galicia, Krombacher

Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group

Buyer's Guide

Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

February 2026

Free Report: Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection report.

See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.