LiquidPlanner vs Wrike comparison

LiquidPlanner and Wrike are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. LiquidPlanner is ranked #28, while Wrike is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0. LiquidPlanner holds a 1.0% mindshare in PMS, compared to Wrike’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of LiquidPlanner users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Wrike users who would recommend it.

LiquidPlanner

Read 3 LiquidPlanner reviews

1,464 Views
1,215 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Wrike

Read 59 Wrike reviews

4,163 Views
3,414 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

LiquidPlanner

Wrike

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

LiquidPlanner and Wrike are competing project management solutions, each offering distinct advantages that cater to different business needs. Wrike appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and better integration capabilities.

Features: LiquidPlanner provides dynamic project scheduling, predictive project scheduling, and resource management. Wrike offers versatile task management, advanced reporting tools, and integrations with various platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiquidPlanner has a detailed setup process that maximizes its scheduling capabilities, supported by detailed documentation and professional assistance. Wrike offers a straightforward deployment model with intuitive onboarding and dedicated support channels, facilitated by robust integration capabilities that simplify adoption.

Pricing and ROI: LiquidPlanner offers tiered pricing that may elevate initial costs but promises long-term efficiency gains through automation features. Wrike, with a consistent pricing model, aligns with extensive features, offering predictable budgeting and ROI through productivity enhancements. Wrike's pricing model provides more predictable budgeting compared to LiquidPlanner's tiered offerings.

To learn more, read our detailed LiquidPlanner vs. Wrike Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

LiquidPlanner vs. Wrike

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiquidPlanner

Ranking in Project Management Software

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wrike

Ranking in Project Management Software

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wrike is 2.5%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Wrike	2.5%
LiquidPlanner	1.0%
Other	96.5%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Paul Gruver

Sr. Project Manager at Stradley Ronon

Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management

It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.

Read full review

Awadhesh Singh

Project Manager at NebuFlow

Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable, and we are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."

"The entire organisation is now on the same page, with one source of truth."

"LiquidPlanner is a great tool for Getting Things Done enthusiasts and project managers in general."

"With the enhanced features of Enterprise such as custom fields and user groups, we are able to accomplish so much more and gain a better footing across the board."

"The initial setup was intuitive, but the training and support videos provided help in moving us to a more developed organizational system."

"Wrike has made it easy to get people to participate, because it's very user friendly."

"Wrike's Gantt charts are great for project management and super simple to implement and use."

"Wrike was the only one in our price range that has a complete feature set for those managing projects our size."

"In our company, we heavily rely on Wrike. Wrike has helped in communication, managing all sorts of projects and tasks, and having a history of all our correspondence items."

"I can see at a glance what assignments are in process, who they are assigned too, and it basically saves me a lot of time and confusion trying to keep track of everyone and their workloads."

"Great software with excellent support."

More Wrike pros

Cons

"Perhaps my only comment is that it is not cheap but in saying that, it is worth every penny."

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome."

"I'd like to see more power and triggers in the iOS app."

"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."

"The response from the website is a little bit slow, and the tool is too expensive for a small team."

"There's always a room for improvement for any product, and they need to include support for re-occurring tasks."

"It doesn't allow you to quickly see whether certain teams are over-scheduled at a quick glance."

"We faced an issue with the Wrike outlook add-on; it is only available for Microsoft Office 365, and not the on-premise version."

"The flexibility, which is a strength, also requires you to think through how to structure Wrike to best serve your needs."

"The customer service is great, but it is not perfect but they really help you."

"Interface takes a bit to get used to."

"On one side, it's very easy to create a task with text, but on the other side, it's not very well-formatted. Therefore, it's difficult to track specific data written in a task. We are making templates, but it's not enough to use a template to know the exact status of different tasks. One thing that we are looking for in Wrike is a better workflow. Because we can only move the status of tasks, we can't really manage workflow and send a task to a specific person. This is what is really missing in Wrike as compared to other tools. We are looking to replace Wrike because we need support for workflow. Another issue with Wrike is that they bring a lot of versions of the tool, which it's not so easy. They bring new versions very frequently, and these versions look similar. For example, we are using robots to read the tasks in the tools, which is problematic with Wrike because it is changing very frequently."

More Wrike cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Wrike is expensive."

"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."

"Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."

"From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user203955

Managing Director with 51-200 employees

Feb 25, 2015

Podio vs. Wrike vs. LiquidPlanner

Having outgrown the features of our trusted project management software, we began to explore options to allow for the sustained growth of SIX AD. Taking Stock Having identified that Basecamp no longer met our needs as a practice, we began a process of defining what we needed from our project…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

29%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	39
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Wrike?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Wrike?

I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Wrike?

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. I would recommend it to others.

See all answers

Comparisons

Ninety vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

CMW Platform vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

Smartsheet vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 8% of the time

Jira vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 7% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs LiquidPlanner

Compared 7% of the time

More LiquidPlanner Competitors

monday.com vs Wrike

Compared 9% of the time

Asana vs Wrike

Compared 8% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs Wrike

Compared 6% of the time

Smartsheet vs Wrike

Compared 5% of the time

Planview AdaptiveWork vs Wrike

Compared 2% of the time

More Wrike Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

June 2026

Download LiquidPlanner product report

Buyer's Guide

Wrike

May 2026

Download Wrike product report

Overview

LiquidPlanner offers a dynamic planning solution tailored for businesses that require precise forecasting and task prioritization. It's designed to enhance project visibility and improve time management through sophisticated algorithms.

The tool integrates predictive scheduling, allowing teams to plan with confidence by automatically adjusting tasks and deadlines based on real-time data. Supporting effective collaboration, LiquidPlanner helps eliminate bottlenecks and align team efforts towards shared objectives. The platform suits teams seeking optimized project timelines and data-driven insights.

What are the most valuable features of LiquidPlanner?

Predictive Scheduling: Automatically adjusts timelines based on real-time inputs.
Task Prioritization: Enables clear ranking of tasks to ensure resource focus.
Resource Management: Allocates resources efficiently to maximize output.
Time Tracking: Facilitates accurate monitoring of time spent on projects.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances team communication and data sharing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Time Efficiency: Streamlined processes reduce project duration.
Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help in achieving deadlines.
Enhanced Productivity: Prioritization aids in focusing efforts where needed most.
Cost Savings: Optimal resource use contributes to budget management.

LiquidPlanner is implemented across industries such as IT, consulting, and engineering where project complexity demands adaptable planning tools. Its predictive capabilities make it a suitable choice for environments needing flexibility and precise adjustments to timeframes and resources.

LiquidPlanner

Wrike is an enterprise-grade, trusted work delivery platform designed to help organizations put people and AI to work together on their most consequential workflows. Built on two decades of enterprise work management and powered by the Wrike Work Intelligence® Graph, Wrike gives teams the governed foundation they need to plan, execute, and deliver complex work at scale. Wrike offers tailored solutions for marketing and creative teams, project management teams, product teams, professional services teams, and beyond.

AI-Powered Work Delivery

Wrike has been building AI into the fabric of the platform for nearly a decade, giving organizations a suite of deeply integrated capabilities designed to extend what people can accomplish. Wrike AI Agents handle real work autonomously inside the platform, moving workflows forward within the same roles, permissions, and access controls as your people. Wrike Copilot reduces administrative burden by drafting content, summarizing projects, and generating status reports directly in the flow of work. And the Wrike MCP Server connects AI assistants directly to the platform where execution actually happens, so every AI-driven action becomes part of the auditable record of how work gets done, not a disconnected output living outside the system. All of it is powered by the Work Intelligence® Graph, built on 500B+ historical data points and two decades of enterprise work management, giving every AI capability the structured context it needs to act reliably. Together, they give organizations the governed foundation to scale delivery in a way that wasn't possible before.

Security

Wrike is ISO 27001 certified with SOC 2 and SOC 3 audit reports and full GDPR compliance across every data touchpoint. Data centers operate in both the US and EU, with encryption at rest and in transit. Every AI-driven action in Wrike is permission-scoped, logged, and auditable, with a full audit trail ensuring every action is attributable. Role-based access controls scale to 100,000+ users across 40 or more countries, and OAuth 2.0 security replaces generic API keys with short-lived, user-scoped, revocable tokens so each AI assistant operates with defined, controlled permissions.

Collaboration

Wrike brings the enterprise together regardless of where people are, with built-in communication and editing tools that eliminate silos and foster transparency and accountability across teams. Wrike's MCP Server allows AI assistants to connect directly to the platform where execution actually happens, so AI-driven actions become part of the auditable record of how work gets done — not disconnected outputs living outside the system. Hundreds of integrations, including Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams, keep work connected across every tool your teams rely on.

Visibility

Wrike delivers real-time visualizations of team and project portfolio performance to facilitate faster, smarter, data-driven decisions. Customizable dashboards, Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and advanced reporting bring full transparency into project status for stakeholders at every level. Powered by the Work Intelligence® Graph, Wrike can auto-generate executive reports pulled directly from live data, giving compliance, legal, and leadership teams project status they can actually rely on.

Wrike

Sample Customers

Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins

Siemens, Walmart, NVIDIA, Blue Yonder, Syneos Health, Sony Pictures, Ogilvy, and The Estée Lauder Companies

Buyer's Guide

LiquidPlanner vs. Wrike

June 2026

Free Report: LiquidPlanner vs. Wrike

Find out what your peers are saying about LiquidPlanner vs. Wrike and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LiquidPlanner vs. Wrike report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.