No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

LiquidPlanner vs Wrike comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LiquidPlanner
Ranking in Project Management Software
26th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Wrike
Ranking in Project Management Software
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wrike is 2.3%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Wrike2.3%
LiquidPlanner1.0%
Other96.7%
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

PG
Sr. Project Manager at Stradley Ronon
Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management
It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.
Awadhesh Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at NebuFlow
Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously
There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"LiquidPlanner is a great tool for Getting Things Done enthusiasts and project managers in general."
"Its dashboards and reports are the most valuable, and we are able to share these reports and other information with our leadership."
"The entire organisation is now on the same page, with one source of truth."
"Tagging and following of tasks."
"Yes, we had one solution, but it didn't have many features which we found in Wrike during the trial period."
"Multiple people can share their comments and coordinate on a single task, which makes the work more fun and productive."
"By creating a custom dashboard with daily priorities employees stay motivated and efficient."
"Large projects are much easier to manage and keep track of who is doing what portion and when."
"The initial setup was intuitive, but the training and support videos provided help in moving us to a more developed organizational system."
"The product is intuitive. It is easy to learn and update. You can follow the project from the beginning till the end with the help of the solution. The tool helps to update the project in seconds."
"It's a very easy-to-use and flexible tool. We can easily write and create queues for different themes. It's very user-friendly."
 

Cons

"Perhaps my only comment is that it is not cheap but in saying that, it is worth every penny."
"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome."
"I'd like to see more power and triggers in the iOS app."
"It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality."
"Better ways to establish private communication between users vs collaborators."
"When zooming in, I lost the ability to see what I input in the description area."
"The pay model is in blocks of users - would be nice to add one user at a time"
"Wrike needs to be more responsive to community requests for new features."
"Unfortunately there are a few dislikes: Various exports like the whole folder structure with the users who are directly shared with or the users/collaborators full list is not working."
"We feel that the actual project reports and roll-ups could be a lot different."
"Sometimes, since it's in the cloud, information isn't updated as fast as you need it to be."
"I would love to have a more user friendly layout of the page in order to understand all those important features that will help me."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."
"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."
"Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."
"Wrike is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user203955 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director with 51-200 employees
Feb 25, 2015
Podio vs. Wrike vs. LiquidPlanner
Having outgrown the features of our trusted project management software, we began to explore options to allow for the sustained growth of SIX AD. Taking Stock Having identified that Basecamp no longer met our needs as a practice, we began a process of defining what we needed from our project…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
25%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Educational Organization
8%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise9
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins
Siemens, Walmart, NVIDIA, Blue Yonder, Syneos Health, Sony Pictures, Ogilvy, and The Estée Lauder Companies
Find out what your peers are saying about LiquidPlanner vs. Wrike and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.