LiveAction LiveNX vs ManageEngine OpManager comparison

BlueCat and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. BlueCat is ranked #49 with an average rating of 7.0, while ManageEngine is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4. BlueCat holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

LiveAction LiveNX

Read 8 LiveAction LiveNX reviews

1,322 Views
955 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 51 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

2,990 Views
1,957 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

LiveAction LiveNX

ManageEngine OpManager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ManageEngine OpManager and LiveAction LiveNX compete in the network monitoring solutions category. Users prefer ManageEngine OpManager for pricing and support, while LiveAction LiveNX is favored for its network monitoring features, justifying its higher price.

Features: ManageEngine OpManager offers robust device and network monitoring, automation capabilities to restart services upon failure, and comprehensive reporting for executives. Its features include threshold definitions, monitoring alerts, and device backup management. LiveAction LiveNX provides real-time network visualization, analytics, and clear graphical interfaces for bandwidth management. It supports critical alert settings and integrates well with Cisco SD-WAN solutions.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine OpManager users report issues with change control during upgrades, such as database impacts and UI inconsistencies. Desired improvements include AI features, better documentation, and enhanced local support. LiveAction LiveNX could improve multi-tenancy capabilities and API integration with non-Cisco platforms, and its documentation and customer support need development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer on-premise deployment solutions. ManageEngine OpManager faces deployment difficulties in areas with less experienced support. LiveAction LiveNX receives positive feedback on customer service and technical support, though it has limited 24/7 coverage.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine OpManager is noted for competitive pricing and quick ROI due to reduced administrative overheads, offering flexible licensing with optional discounts for existing users. LiveAction LiveNX is more expensive but is effective for extensive site monitoring, avoiding per-user charges. Both demonstrate rapid ROI through improved uptime and streamlined operations.

To learn more, read our detailed LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveAction LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

49th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (48th)

ManageEngine OpManager

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LiveAction LiveNX is 0.7%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine OpManager is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mahesh Doshi

IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Very good reporting and alerting abilities but inadequate enhancement support

Before choosing the solution, it is important to rank your requirements from high to low priority. The solution has a lot of features but at a high price. If you will only use 30% of the solution to meet your requirements, then it would be better for you to explore other products. Find the solution that best fulfills your requirements. The solution itself is great. If I could use it properly, then I would rate it a seven out of ten. Unfortunately, support is a factor when determining usability or cost effectiveness. We did not receive the needed support so had to stop using the solution. For that reason, my overall rating for the solution is a five out of ten.

Read full review

MUBDIUL ISLAM

Junior System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

NetFlow monitoring has improved operations but needs better configurations

For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface. When I add the interface, I am confused about which interface is connected to which endpoint. If identifying the interface was easier, it would take less time to configure. Another issue is with threshold values; sometimes, it shows kilobytes (kB) while our threshold is set to gigabytes. This can be confusing. Improving this aspect would be beneficial. In URL monitoring, there is room for enhancement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"The alerting feature is very good because it allows you to set MOS alerts at various network junctures or data points."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"The solution is finely stable."

"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."

"I am satisfied with ManageEngine OpManager's monitoring features."

"It is easy to use and deploy."

"The integration with the firewall monitoring, the security monitoring, is great."

"Overall, I give the product a rating of ten."

"The dashboard is unique and user-friendly."

"This is a good general monitoring system that has all the features we require and they constantly update with new capabilities."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

Cons

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"It is not as robust as other NPM solutions. For instance, there is a problem while labeling specific applications. It works well with well-known applications, but when you have to put in new applications that are not very known and set them up with names, ports, URLs, or some protocols, it is not as intuitive."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"The dashboard could include more features."

"We encounter challenges in monitoring cloud services. I would also appreciate it if there was someone available to walk you through the documentation."

"What I'd like ManageEngine OpManager to improve on is artificial intelligence. In particular, the machine learning feature should be integrated with the sensor flow. Doing this will give leverage, especially when you look at other products such as the Cisco DNA Center. When a switch goes down, I should be able to build on the correlation of other physical devices it's connected to so that I can integrate that with my CA CMDB. The ManageEngine OpManager team needs to draw a long-term roadmap where that feature becomes an integral part of the solution because right now, machine learning in ManageEngine OpManager is a long process. The solution doesn't have MLS search and I want to see ML being developed and applied for CA CMDB to greatly reduce the burden of tying everything. For example, if I have a data center switch that goes down now, I should know what server it's connected to, and when that switch goes down at twenty-four ports, I would get twenty-four alerts for different devices plugged in. I should be able to make a correlation that the major problem lies in the switch and not with the twenty-four elements connected to that switch. That is where machine learning should come into play and the ManageEngine OpManager AI should indicate "This is where the root of your problem is." It could be difficult, but this is a feature that should be improved or added to the solution."

"The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved."

"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."

"The only problem with it is that the setup isn't very intuitive. I know that they just upgraded the product to make it a little bit easier to use, but compared to some of the other platforms, it is not easy to configure it, set it up, and get it running. However, once you have set it up and got it running, it runs great."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view. When I create the business view, I experience problems with the port interface."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version."

"It's very expensive."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

"The pricing is moderate."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable."

"ManageEngine OpManager has a three-tier licensing model."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The solution's pricing is very low compared to other products."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly and based on the number of applications."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Educational Organization

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LiveAction LiveNX?

The product has a very good graphical interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The product is weak in multi-tenancy. We have to install multiple instances of LiveAction, whereas we would like to build it once for our customers. Most of these analytical packages have the same ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

Primarily, we use the product for monitoring the standard utilization of circuits. The tool has the incredible ability to provide granular details about the traffic passing through an interface on ...

See all answers

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 17% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 11% of the time

NetBrain vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 8% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs LiveAction LiveNX

Compared 7% of the time

More LiveAction LiveNX Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 24% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 14% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX

May 2025

Download LiveAction LiveNX product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

May 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Also Known As

LiveNX

OpManager

Overview

LiveAction develops IT visibility solutions designed to simplify network management. Initially developed to aid the US Department of Defense in the operation of its networks, LiveNX (Network Experience) features an innovative visual display, real-time big data analytics and deep control of routers and switches for unparalleled network administration. LiveNX accelerates troubleshooting with its QoS control, application-aware, and WAN functionality developed through engineering partnerships with Cisco Systems.

BlueCat

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Buyer's Guide

LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager

April 2025

Free Report: LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager

Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LiveAction LiveNX vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.