Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Loom Business - Enterprise vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Loom Business - Enterprise
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
173
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Loom Business - Enterprise is 2.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 8.4%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Teams8.4%
Loom Business - Enterprise2.2%
Other89.4%
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Konjengbam  Mitindra Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Business Development Representative at a educational organization with 201-500 employees
Team meetings have become more productive and video transcripts support ongoing collaboration
Loom Business - Enterprise provides transcripts, which is very helpful. Moreover, whenever needed, users can come back to refer to those videos or meetings, making it very important. The best feature Loom Business - Enterprise offers is video recording. This feature stands out because of its ease of use, quality, and accessibility by anyone in the team. The transcripts from Loom Business - Enterprise are pretty good and accurate, making it a very reliable platform. Loom Business - Enterprise has made team meetings more efficient as sometimes team members are unable to participate. We can create video references for them to connect with others who missed the meeting. This makes the overall meeting more productive despite some members being absent. Since using Loom Business - Enterprise, communication has become more efficient because meeting videos are recorded and made available for anyone who was not present in the meeting.
Anna Virtsan - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Project Manager at UkrSibbank
Have streamlined daily workflow and task management but still face inconvenience from recent interface changes and limited integration options
There are challenges and issues in Microsoft Teams, such as after recent updates where group chats were combined with Teams, chats, and groups into one. Users have to work with settings to make it normal again so Teams are separated from chats, and that was a really inconvenient update. Many users ask me to help make it back again to separate Teams and groups from one-to-one chats. That's probably the worst update they've made recently. Additionally, there are some minor features, such as when I work with messages, I don't have an actual forward or quote option when replying to someone's message. I need to be careful not to miss the quote sign. For a lot of people, they are confused about where the quotes option is. I've received a couple of hundred support tickets just regarding this issue. The function to share email to Teams chat doesn't work sometimes due to our compliance policies, and sometimes it would be nice to be able to forward an email to the group chat and have further discussions. Microsoft Teams could improve by being less glitchy because it glitches a lot, leading to undelivered emails and undelivered messages. It would be beneficial if the MS application Shifts, which adds functionality to groups, could be integrated into the groups calendar. Currently, many teams don't use the app because it is not integrated with the general calendar or the Outlook calendar, making it basically a useless application. The platform needs less Copilot and more people. The general Copilot integration into the platform is less glitchy, but Microsoft Teams is quite heavy and glitchy sometimes. Stability depends a lot on compliance restrictions, policies, and quality of internet. Sometimes, when updates are enrolling, the platform glitches, breaks, or shuts down.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product."
"The best feature Loom Business - Enterprise offers is video recording; this feature stands out because of its ease of use, quality, and accessibility by anyone in the team."
"Loom Business - Enterprise has made team meetings more efficient as sometimes team members are unable to participate, and we can create video references for them to connect with others who missed the meeting, making the overall meeting more productive despite some members being absent."
"I like the video call and document-sharing features."
"You can add teams to a conversation. You can create reports, project plans, or many other things based on Microsoft solutions. It has improved communication between teams and within each team."
"The product is continually growing to add new features and functionality."
"Microsoft Teams is much easier to collaborate, and its meetings are quite easy to explain things."
"The tool's integration with OneNote and Power BI is good. The current version of Microsoft Teams is significantly more user-friendly compared to previous versions. I find it easy to handle any user needs and provide assistance. The device installation process is straightforward, and configuring it for users is not complicated. This seamless and user-friendly experience makes it easy to connect with everyone."
"I find the chat and messaging system in Microsoft Teams the most valuable for productivity. We replaced Zoom and other video conferencing tools with Teams for internal and external video calls. Teams is now our standard tool for communication, handling both audio and video conference calls."
"I don't have to physically go to the meetings; I can do it virtually."
"Microsoft Teams is user-friendly and flexible. I like its SharePoint feature also."
 

Cons

"The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time."
"Loom Business - Enterprise can handle our organization's needs as we grow, but it needs to improve its features so that all our needs are met at that point in time."
"Loom Business - Enterprise can handle our organization's needs as we grow, but it needs to improve its features so that all our needs are met at that point in time."
"Only once did we really get help from Microsoft support; the rest were cases we resolved ourselves while just exchanging useless emails with support."
"The product's support can be better."
"The solution could be lighter in terms of storage performance."
"In terms of functionality, I would like to see support for multi-user or multiple windows for the File structure."
"Sometimes Avaya is required for Teams to work well on phones."
"They need to improve the scalability of Teams."
"The future scalability can include the integration of planners, project management tools, SharePoint, and more applications that are used."
"It would be good if the solution had some sort of AI built into it while taking the transcript so that at least the sentences made sense."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."
"Microsoft Teams is expensive compared to other solutions."
"The tool's price is high. We purchase Microsoft Office 365 on per user basis and we get support also on that basis."
"I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its pricing."
"The product is expensive, and I rate its pricing a ten out of ten."
"It costs around $12 for SharePoint and Teams per user."
"We get the solution on a corporate plan, where everything is included."
"I would rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business64
Midsize Enterprise43
Large Enterprise70
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Loom?
Loom Business - Enterprise can be improved, and more features can be added. The linking of videos or the integration of other platforms can be made more linear. Loom Business - Enterprise can handl...
What is your primary use case for Loom?
I mostly use Loom Business - Enterprise for recording videos.
What advice do you have for others considering Loom?
The user interface of Loom Business - Enterprise is pretty user-friendly. I would rate Loom Business - Enterprise an 8.5 out of 10 because it has more scope for improvement, and overall, the curren...
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Regarding the license, the Microsoft 365 license I am taking is quite expensive, and every year it goes higher. The solution is expensive for Microsoft Teams as well.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
Today, we do not integrate any third-party apps into Microsoft Teams, but we may use project management tools such as Jira in the future. We used to integrate something, but now we do not need it. ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

hubspot, airtable, grubhub
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Loom Business - Enterprise vs. Microsoft Teams and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.