

SnapLogic and Make compete in the integration platform category. SnapLogic has the upper hand for complex integrations due to its extensive features suited for high-volume tasks.
Features: SnapLogic is designed for complex integrations with its drag-and-drop interface and pre-built connectors, providing low-code capabilities for efficient workflow automation. It supports high-volume data transfers and offers flexibility through Snaps. Make stands out with its simple interface that makes automation accessible. Its flexibility and wide range of integrations simplify the creation of workflows and automations.
Room for Improvement: SnapLogic needs more pre-built integrations, better debugging tools, and enhanced support. There are also suggestions for handling large data better and reducing latency. Make could simplify its interface, enhance its security documentation, and address pricing concerns. Improvements in platform speed and expanded support resources are also suggested.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic offers private and hybrid cloud deployment options, though customer support experiences are mixed with some needing improved response times. Make is limited to public cloud deployments but generally has well-regarded support, although stronger security documentation and clearer protocols are called for.
Pricing and ROI: SnapLogic has a higher cost, especially for complex tasks, but it's considered worthy due to its robust features and ROI from reducing errors and manual work. Make is seen as cost-effective for simpler tasks, appealing to budget-conscious users. Its lower entry cost makes it accessible for smaller scale integrations, enhancing ROI by saving time and reducing manual effort.
I have indeed seen a return on investment as it has saved us hundreds of hours in repetitive tasks, streamlining our follow-up to the leads that we are generating.
I implemented a booking system for my client that previously required data to be entered directly into Google Sheets and reminders to be sent manually; using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved.
With that extra time each month, I could focus more on sales and upscaling my business, so it is really worth it.
SnapLogic is really helpful and processes in very little time, so it doesn't take much time compared to any legacy tool.
The reports and pipelines run, leading to cost savings that reduce manual effort and save 50,000 to 150,000 USD annually.
It improved our productivity by fifteen percent and shifted work from IT to business users.
We have escalated a few issues that we faced during some integrations, and we received reasonable responses from Make support.
They were doing the best job for my use cases and my problems.
When I had a problem during the pricing payment, the customer support handled it very well.
The responsiveness, technical expertise, knowledge base and documentation, support channels, and continuous improvement were impeccable.
The technical support from SnapLogic is excellent, and I would give it a complete ten.
Some SMEs are allotted for the organization, so in case of any issue, we have their email IDs to contact them for support, including SMEs and community.
When you have an error, it is very hard to do error handling and debugging.
Make's scalability is very good, and if the pricing were lower, I could scale a lot more.
Whenever a new task comes to mind, I think about automating it with Make, which is good.
After implementing SnapLogic, pipelines that processed one to two million records per week can now handle five to 10 million records without additional infrastructure.
SnapLogic is very scalable, and it can be adjusted based on our requirements, considering the organization type and the data it produces.
SnapLogic is easily scalable.
I would rate the stability of SnapLogic as nearly ten out of ten.
But recently, in a year, I haven't found many performance issues in SnapLogic.
There should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make.
I would love to have more detailed logs, step-by-step error tracing, and better visualization of failed executions, as I think it would improve the user experience significantly.
The lagging problem needs to be solved.
We require a data pipeline that can be read without latency and without any delay.
Having more granular control and deeper insights into execution performance would really help.
If the AI capabilities and integrations were more intuitive and easy to learn for new users, it would be greatly beneficial.
Licensing was affordable.
I found a solution that allows me to use Make almost for free, just using the Docker on-premises.
It's cost-effective and it's pocket-friendly.
In terms of setup cost, it is relatively low compared to traditional on-premises tools.
There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower.
SnapLogic is positioned at around seven or eight out of ten in terms of pricing.
Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn.
Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make.
The task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make.
I also like the whole child-parent pipeline feature; it allows me to break up a process into smaller pieces and then have one big pipeline that controls these smaller pipelines.
SnapLogic provides inbuilt Snaplets, such as creating and closing an audit ID, removing duplicates, joining tables, writing to Oracle, files, XML, SF, SMTP connections, and more.
SnapLogic excels in data transformations, monitoring, and observability, providing scalability controls for the pipelines.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Make | 1.4% |
| SnapLogic | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.
At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.
What features does Make offer?In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.
The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.