Top 10 Make Alternatives

Name: Make
Brand: Make
Rating: 4.0 (18 reviews)

Vendor: Make

4.0 out of 5

18 reviews
86% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top Make Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Make based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Pega Platform, and Appian. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Make surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled automation capabilities and seamless integrations, enabling efficient workflow management with an intuitive interface and extensive customization options that empower users to optimize their processes effortlessly.

Make Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Make, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda's open-source platform is ideal for Java integrations. In comparison, Make's low-code interface excels in ease of use. Camunda offers flexibility in deployment, while Make focuses on cloud availability. Both promise positive ROI, though Camunda requires more initial integration effort.

Download Camunda vs. Make Report

Pricing

Camunda's setup cost may be higher initially, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Make offers a more budget-friendly setup, catering to businesses seeking cost-effective automation solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform excels in rapid prototyping and comprehensive case management, offering significant ROI for enterprises. In comparison, Make's intuitive drag-and-drop interface and cost-effective pricing suit smaller organizations seeking budget-friendly automation solutions with extensive integrations and ease of use.

Download Make vs. Pega Platform Report

Pricing

Pega Platform requires a higher setup cost, while Make offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Pega Platform requires a higher setup cost, while Make offers a more cost-effective initial setup.

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian offers a robust low-code development environment focused on business process management and rapid deployment. In comparison, Make provides extensive integration options and a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, attracting those preferring custom functionalities and operational flexibility.

Download Appian vs. Make Report

Pricing

Appian offers higher setup costs compared to Make, which provides a more budget-friendly option, highlighting the difference in initial price point between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Appian offers higher setup costs compared to Make, which provides a more budget-friendly option, highlighting the difference in initial price point between the two solutions.

SnapLogic

4.0 out of 5

SnapLogic

4.0 out of 5

SnapLogic offers robust enterprise capabilities ideal for large-scale integrations and complex processes. In comparison, Make is budget-friendly, perfect for simple automations and cost-efficient operations. SnapLogic's advanced deployment options surpass Make's simplicity, which appeals to budget-conscious tech buyers.

Download Make vs. SnapLogic Report

Pricing

SnapLogic involves a higher initial setup cost, providing extensive enterprise-level features, while Make offers a more budget-friendly setup appealing to smaller businesses and startups.

View comparison

Pricing

SnapLogic involves a higher initial setup cost, providing extensive enterprise-level features, while Make offers a more budget-friendly setup appealing to smaller businesses and startups.

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform offers strong scalability and integration, appealing to enterprise needs. In comparison, Make's modular, low-code interface and affordability make it suitable for budget-conscious users seeking efficient automation.

Download Make vs. Nintex Process Platform Report

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Make, which offers a more cost-effective option for initial installation.

View comparison

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Make, which offers a more cost-effective option for initial installation.

Zapier

4.2 out of 5

Zapier

4.2 out of 5

Zapier offers simplicity in connecting systems with minimal technical skills needed. In comparison, Make provides flexibility with complex workflow customization through a modular interface. Zapier users may appreciate ease of deployment, while Make's cost-effectiveness and control options appeal to budget-conscious buyers.

Download Make vs. Zapier Report

Pricing

Zapier's setup cost is often higher than Make's, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for those choosing Make.

View comparison

Pricing

Zapier's setup cost is often higher than Make's, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for those choosing Make.

Temporal

4.3 out of 5

Temporal

4.3 out of 5

Make's low-code interface offers easy integrations, appealing to non-developers. In comparison, Temporal caters to developers with robust workflow tools. Make's pricing enhances ROI, while Temporal's open-source model minimizes costs. Make excels in customer service, whereas Temporal suits experienced users needing complex workflow management.

Download Make vs. Temporal Report

Pricing

Make's setup cost is noted as straightforward and affordable, whereas Temporal's setup involves higher upfront expenses, highlighting distinct priorities in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Make's setup cost is noted as straightforward and affordable, whereas Temporal's setup involves higher upfront expenses, highlighting distinct priorities in initial investment.

WorkFusion

3.8 out of 5

WorkFusion

3.8 out of 5

WorkFusion offers superior document recognition and scalable RPA for enterprise clients, excelling in complex workflows with its advanced analytics. In comparison, Make features a flexible, low-code interface with extensive integrations, suitable for smaller operations seeking cost-effective automation.

Download Make vs. WorkFusion Report

Pricing

WorkFusion's setup costs are higher, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Make offers a more affordable initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious users. This price distinction highlights WorkFusion's focus on comprehensive solutions versus Make's cost-effective approach.

View comparison

Pricing

Tray.io

3.8 out of 5

Tray.io

3.8 out of 5

Tray.io excels with robust API integrations and comprehensive workflow tools, suiting complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Make offers flexibility and simplicity with an intuitive design. Tray.io appeals to enterprises seeking customization, while Make attracts those valuing ease-of-use and swift deployment.

Download Make vs. Tray.io Report

Pricing

Tray.io's setup cost is transparent and generally upfront, while Make offers more variations in initial expenses depending on user needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Tray.io's setup cost is transparent and generally upfront, while Make offers more variations in initial expenses depending on user needs.

Orkes

1 out of 5

Orkes

1 out of 5

Make offers competitive pricing and easy-to-use automation for small to medium businesses with straightforward needs. In comparison, Orkes provides robust scalability and enterprise functions, ideal for complex workflows, appealing to larger organizations needing comprehensive management and tailored long-term solutions.

Pricing

Make requires a minimal setup cost, whereas Orkes may involve higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Make requires a minimal setup cost, whereas Orkes may involve higher initial expenses.

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Process Automation

AI Software Development

Business Process Design