Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Make Logo

Top 10 Make Alternatives

Vendor: Make
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Make Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Make based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Pega Platform, and Appian. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Make surpasses its competitors by offering a highly intuitive automation platform with robust integration capabilities, real-time collaboration, and seamless scalability, empowering users to efficiently streamline workflows and maximize productivity across various applications.

Make Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Make, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Make Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Make Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Camunda's open-source platform is ideal for Java integrations. In comparison, Make's low-code interface excels in ease of use. Camunda offers flexibility in deployment, while Make focuses on cloud availability. Both promise positive ROI, though Camunda requires more initial integration effort.
Download Camunda vs. Make Report
Camunda's setup cost may be higher initially, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Make offers a more budget-friendly setup, catering to businesses seeking cost-effective automation solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Camunda's setup cost may be higher initially, reflecting its comprehensive features, while Make offers a more budget-friendly setup, catering to businesses seeking cost-effective automation solutions.
Make Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Make Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Pega Platform excels in rapid prototyping and comprehensive case management, offering significant ROI for enterprises. In comparison, Make's intuitive drag-and-drop interface and cost-effective pricing suit smaller organizations seeking budget-friendly automation solutions with extensive integrations and ease of use.
Download Make vs. Pega Platform Report
Pega Platform requires a higher setup cost, while Make offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Pega Platform requires a higher setup cost, while Make offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Make Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Make Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Appian offers a robust low-code development environment focused on business process management and rapid deployment. In comparison, Make provides extensive integration options and a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, attracting those preferring custom functionalities and operational flexibility.
Download Appian vs. Make Report
Appian offers higher setup costs compared to Make, which provides a more budget-friendly option, highlighting the difference in initial price point between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian offers higher setup costs compared to Make, which provides a more budget-friendly option, highlighting the difference in initial price point between the two solutions.
Make Logo
Temporal
4.3 out of 5
Make Logo
Temporal
4.3 out of 5
Make's low-code interface offers easy integrations, appealing to non-developers. In comparison, Temporal caters to developers with robust workflow tools. Make's pricing enhances ROI, while Temporal's open-source model minimizes costs. Make excels in customer service, whereas Temporal suits experienced users needing complex workflow management.
Download Make vs. Temporal Report
Make's setup cost is noted as straightforward and affordable, whereas Temporal's setup involves higher upfront expenses, highlighting distinct priorities in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Make's setup cost is noted as straightforward and affordable, whereas Temporal's setup involves higher upfront expenses, highlighting distinct priorities in initial investment.
Make Logo
Make Logo
Nintex Process Platform
3.9 out of 5
Nintex Process Platform offers strong scalability and integration, appealing to enterprise needs. In comparison, Make's modular, low-code interface and affordability make it suitable for budget-conscious users seeking efficient automation.
Download Make vs. Nintex Process Platform Report
Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Make, which offers a more cost-effective option for initial installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Nintex Process Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Make, which offers a more cost-effective option for initial installation.
Make Logo
Zapier
4.2 out of 5
Make Logo
Zapier
4.2 out of 5
Zapier offers simplicity in connecting systems with minimal technical skills needed. In comparison, Make provides flexibility with complex workflow customization through a modular interface. Zapier users may appreciate ease of deployment, while Make's cost-effectiveness and control options appeal to budget-conscious buyers.
Download Make vs. Zapier Report
Zapier's setup cost is often higher than Make's, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for those choosing Make.
View comparison
Pricing
Zapier's setup cost is often higher than Make's, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for those choosing Make.
Make Logo
Tray.io
3.5 out of 5
Make Logo
Tray.io
3.5 out of 5
Tray.io excels with robust API integrations and comprehensive workflow tools, suiting complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Make offers flexibility and simplicity with an intuitive design. Tray.io appeals to enterprises seeking customization, while Make attracts those valuing ease-of-use and swift deployment.
Tray.io's setup cost is transparent and generally upfront, while Make offers more variations in initial expenses depending on user needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Tray.io's setup cost is transparent and generally upfront, while Make offers more variations in initial expenses depending on user needs.

Related categories

Process Automation
AI Software Development
Business Process Design