No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Make vs Rundeck comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Make
Ranking in Process Automation
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
AI Software Development (4th)
Rundeck
Ranking in Process Automation
35th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Make is 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rundeck is 1.0%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Make1.7%
Rundeck1.0%
Other97.3%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Dinesh Lavu - PeerSpot reviewer
Bubble.Io | Xano | No Code | Mba | Make | Zapier | Full Stack at Indian Railways
Automation workflows have saved time and have reduced manual work for my client projects
Most of what I learned about Make is mainly from the templates only. Anything that I tried to do, I try to see who has done it already and try to understand and rebuild it. When I'm trying to build some workflows, there's a chatbot component. When I ask for something, it helps me in that. Or if I get a bug that I'm finding difficult to debug or understand the use case or the log, it clearly explains it to me and sometimes it advises me to do certain things, so that it's easy for me to fix it. One area for improvement is an auto-building feature. Another is how n8n has a chatbot completion where you can bring some LLMs into the workflow and integrating Ollama and all of that is something I felt is really needed for Make also.
Use Rundeck?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
15%
Educational Organization
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business14
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Make, I would add that they need to provide a dark mode because the UI is in light mode. I remember that when I was working late...
What needs improvement with Make?
I think there are improvements needed for Make. They could add a guide roadmap for beginners to make it more accessible. While Make is easy to use, there is always room for improvement. There are m...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make involves automating social media content creation and personalized content creation for my social profile like Instagram.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Integromat
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Buan Consulting, Armadia
1. Netflix 2. Airbnb 3. Pinterest 4. Cisco 5. Adobe 6. IBM 7. Salesforce 8. Uber 9. Twitter 10. LinkedIn 11. Dropbox 12. Slack 13. Atlassian 14. GitHub 15. Docker 16. Spotify 17. Hulu 18. Square 19. Etsy 20. Zillow 21. Expedia 22. Groupon 23. Yelp 24. Pandora 25. Zynga 26. Fitbit 27. SurveyMonkey 28. Box 29. GoDaddy 30. Twilio 31. Okta 32. Splunk
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: June 2026.
904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.