

OneLogin and Microsoft Entra External ID are both prominent players in the identity and access management sector, competing in providing robust security and user access solutions. OneLogin appears to have the upper hand in user-friendly integration and SSO capabilities, while Microsoft Entra External ID excels in comprehensive integration, especially for hybrid and on-premises environments.
Features: OneLogin includes Single Sign-On, Multi-Factor Authentication, and adaptive SmartFactor for real-time risk assessment, enhancing user experience and security. On the other hand, Microsoft Entra External ID unifies B2C and B2E functionalities, secure environments suited for hybrid setups, and comprehensive integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: OneLogin can refine admin UI usability, error transparency, and enhance self-service capabilities. Microsoft Entra External ID could improve by simplifying licensing models, synchronization times, and better integrating with non-Microsoft and legacy solutions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OneLogin offers versatile cloud and on-premises deployments, with generally proactive customer service, though it faces delays in complex scenarios. Microsoft Entra External ID benefits from tight integration within Microsoft's ecosystem, aiding seamless deployment but involves complex licensing issues.
Pricing and ROI: OneLogin's competitive pricing offers good value by reducing help desk costs and security risks, enhancing productivity. In contrast, Microsoft Entra External ID can become costly with usage scaling, though flexible pricing models aim to cater to different organizational needs, providing secure external system integrations.
It has led to cost savings as well as time savings because I can use a single solution for all applications.
Companies can leverage it for setting up external identities without needing to develop their own solutions.
In terms of return on investment, prior to using this product, our company managed our own mail server with all internal authentication happening on premises, resulting in a ROI in the thousands every year.
Teams spend far less time on password issues, access requests, and onboarding, often cutting IT tickets by 30 to 50 percent.
The full return on investment, including licensing, deployment, and training, was achieved within one month, making it significant.
From a security standpoint, ROI is also significant, as security breaches cost companies billions each year.
Companies without a Microsoft license for Entra ID or Azure portal cannot add Azure AD B2C, creating logistical issues for some of my clients who are unable to evaluate the platform.
The support for business applications, infrastructure support, and Entra has been mostly positive with highly skilled technicians.
The documentation is very thorough, reducing the need for support.
I would rate the customer support a 10.
I have contacted support on a few occasions, mainly for advanced configuration guidance, troubleshooting provisioning issues, and clarifying documentation for complex integrations.
Whenever we've had questions or needed help with setup, their team responded quickly and really guided us step by step.
This is one of EID's weak points compared to Azure AD B2C, which offers customizable authentication options, including attribute and password combinations.
End-user workloads experience increased latency in a cloud environment compared to on-premises resources.
Microsoft Entra External ID is quite scalable, and I would rate its scalability between eight and nine out of ten.
Role-based access controls, automated provisioning, and directory integration scale smoothly, allowing me to maintain consistent policies and workflows even as complexity increases.
It has strong technical capabilities designed to be horizontally scalable, easily supporting a large user base without the need for manual infrastructure upgrades.
Since it is a cloud-based IAM platform, scaling is much easier compared to traditional systems.
I'd rate the stability of the Microsoft Entra External ID as a 10.
The stability of this solution is very good.
I have not encountered any stability issues with Microsoft Entra External ID.
Overall, OneLogin's stability gives me confidence that it can support my organization's current needs and scale as we grow.
There have been no major outages, and performance has been really consistent.
If OneLogin has an issue, users can suddenly lose access to multiple applications at the same time.
This is particularly challenging during enterprise agreement renewals, as it's difficult for customers to review costs leading to lengthy negotiations.
Enhanced customizable login options and the ability to use attribute password logins are critical features that are required for Microsoft Entra External ID to gain dominance in the authentication market.
I would like to see a more detailed alert system that provides a summary of why alerts are generated, who is generating them, and the reasons behind it.
More real-time alerts, such as when access fails or MFA is triggered, would help users understand issues faster.
Step-by-step tutorials and troubleshooting guides would help users resolve issues faster without needing to contact support.
The two major pain points are customer support needing improvement and the integration with third-party software needing to be more flexible.
Regarding pricing, the cost seems high for single sign-on, especially for external applications like Oracle.
Microsoft's pricing is complex and difficult to fathom due to a range of different licensing options.
The cost can be a factor for Microsoft Entra External ID, but in general, it offers a scalable and efficient solution compared to deploying individual solutions.
The cost is less compared to Okta and Entra ID.
Overall, the pricing, setup, and licensing structure are transparent and deliver a good return on investment, especially when considering the operational efficiency and security improvements gained from using OneLogin.
I consider the pricing of OneLogin to be competitive since it is cheaper than other products I used, such as Okta, which is beneficial for mid-size organizations.
It is crucial for hybrid environments, especially for integrating existing on-site infrastructures with cloud-based Active Directory, such as in Office 365 implementations.
EID unifies workforce users with external business partners, which is a very strong feature.
The detailed monitoring and reporting in Microsoft Entra External ID support compliance efforts effectively.
Multi-Factor Authentication is generally useful for adding an extra layer of security, which is crucial, especially for the sensitive nature of the data we handle.
With SmartFactor Authentication, I can balance between them. I can give users an easy and smooth user experience as long as the risk indices are low, but I can implement pretty rigid authentication workflows if the risk gets higher.
OneLogin's best features are its MFA capabilities as well as making it easier to access different applications depending on the user.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OneLogin by One Identity | 3.2% |
| Microsoft Entra External ID | 1.6% |
| Other | 95.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 140 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 41 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
Microsoft Entra External ID provides streamlined identity management with features like Active Directory integration, multi-factor authentication, and centralized user management, supporting both B2C and B2E needs. It's designed to enhance security while simplifying access management across applications.
Microsoft Entra External ID enhances identity management by offering easy setup, robust monitoring, and centralized user management. It supports compliance with comprehensive reporting and integrates seamlessly with Azure. While it facilitates cross-company collaboration, user lifecycle management, and B2B guest access, users note the need for improved technical support, faster synchronization speeds, and more customizable interfaces. Integration with open-source software, legacy tools, and ERP systems is advised along with a more predictable pricing model and improved federated login security. Current licensing complexity and the need for more user-friendly interfaces are areas for development.
What are the most important features?In sectors like IT, finance, and healthcare, Microsoft Entra External ID is utilized for managing complex access needs and compliance requirements, supporting projects involving Active Directory, Microsoft Teams, and cloud-based infrastructures. These industries leverage its capabilities for managing identities and improving secure collaboration while ensuring alignment with existing on-premises systems.
OneLogin offers organizations a user-friendly platform for single sign-on, multifactor authentication, and seamless access management. It enhances security and streamlines processes, making it vital for application management.
Designed for ease of integration, OneLogin helps organizations efficiently manage access and improve cybersecurity through centralized application management. It simplifies onboarding and offboarding, enhancing remote work capabilities and offering robust user mapping. Users appreciate seamless integration and reliable logs. However, it could improve with enhanced technical support, more out-of-box connectors, and better customization options. Challenges with device management and system integrations have been noted, with legacy application support and infrastructure stability needing attention.
What are the key features of OneLogin?
What benefits can users expect?
Organizations employ OneLogin for single sign-on and identity management, connecting users to applications like CRM and Slack. It supports role-based access control and seamless cloud transition, integrating with Active Directory to enhance user management in industries demanding strong security and efficiency.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.