Microsoft Entra ID vs Netwrix Auditor comparison

Microsoft and Netwrix are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while Netwrix is ranked #14 with an average rating of 10.0. Microsoft holds a 25.6% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Netwrix’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Netwrix users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 235 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

23,813 Views
7,858 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Netwrix Auditor

Read 7 Netwrix Auditor reviews

1,891 Views
151 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Netwrix Auditor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 2, 2024

Microsoft Entra ID and Netwrix Auditor compete in the security and access management category. Entra ID holds an edge with its integration and authentication features, while Netwrix Auditor excels in auditing and compliance.

Features: Microsoft Entra ID provides centralized management, single sign-on, and multi-factor authentication, ensuring robust security and seamless access control. Netwrix Auditor focuses on detailed auditing, offering extensive monitoring of admin activities and automated alerts for unauthorized access.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Entra ID can improve market penetration of its authenticator, offer better documentation, and enhance support for legacy systems. Netwrix Auditor could expand its features by integrating DNS and DSTP within the active directory license for improved user experience across different server types.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Entra ID is suitable for large-scale deployments with its scalability across public and hybrid clouds, although support experiences vary. Netwrix Auditor provides consistent support but could improve responsiveness and resource availability. Entra ID has a steeper learning curve due to its wide feature set, while Netwrix's setup aligns with stability.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Entra ID's flexible subscription model integrates with Microsoft 365, offering ROI through reduced manual interventions. However, simpler licensing and cost concerns exist for advanced features. Netwrix Auditor offers cost-effective pricing for detailed auditing, with direct purchase benefits focusing on cost savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. Netwrix Auditor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Netwrix Auditor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

235

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (1st), Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (2nd), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Netwrix Auditor

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

14th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (9th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (24th), Active Directory Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 25.6%, down from 28.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netwrix Auditor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Mohamed Tantawy

IT Technical Support Deputy General Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Can track every admin action in large environments and includes AI modules to detect and prevent unauthorized changes

The initial setup of Netwrix Auditor was straightforward. Some functions require agents while others are agentless, simplifying implementation. It consumed minimal server and client resources, and the wizard-based console made it simple to deploy with the help of architectural teams. All required ports were in place, and they covered all critical services and databases effectively. I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as a nine out of ten. The deployment of Netwrix Auditor took around three weeks, mainly due to the preparation of the environment and servers. The deployment process involved actions such as preparing virtual servers and building databases. Once deployed, it took only about a week to complete. Third-party consultants assisted us with deployment. Only one or two engineers were needed for deployment and maintenance, which could be handled remotely with minimal complexity.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have the ability to define the email user in the designated field."

"It is a really nice tool and we have a license for the more complex model."

"The UI of Microsoft Entra ID is very intuitive, and I appreciate the integration with Azure because it works seamlessly. This is the best aspect I appreciate about Microsoft Entra ID."

"I primarily use this solution for hybrid deployment, security, securing resources and for integration purposes. In terms of security, we have been using the B2B/B2C hybrid integration with the certificate authentication."

"Customer service and technical support for Microsoft Entra ID are very good because I open many tickets with the support and get straight answers."

"The solution scales well."

"I would rate Microsoft Entra ID a solid 10 out of 10."

"Azure Active Directory features have helped improve our security posture. The remote working has been a massive help during the pandemic."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The most valuable features of Netwrix Auditor are its affordability compared to similar products and its comprehensive monitoring of admin activities."

"The most valuable feature is the real-time monitoring."

"I have found user behavior analysis and the ability to run risk assessments important features. Additionally, the interface and online documentation are very good."

"I am impressed with the tool's reporting feature and notifications."

"Netwrix provides features that no other solution on the market does."

"It maintains audit logs for the duration of time that you wish, as long as you have the storage capacity to do so."

"What I find the most valuable about Netwrix Auditor is the way it shows risk. The reports are very clear."

Cons

"Rule management and permissions need improvements."

"Azure Active Directory could improve the two-factor authentication."

"Our users sometimes experience issues from having multiple Microsoft accounts, which can cause some confusion and hassle."

"There are no specific areas where improvement is needed at the moment. Everything has been good so far."

"To look at more documentation, engineering, or an open standard would be nice."

"I would like to dive into some of the things that we saw today around the workflows at this Microsoft event. I cannot say that they need to make it better because I do not have much experience with it, but something that is always applicable to Microsoft is that they need to be able to integrate with their competitors. If you look at IDP, they do not integrate with Okta."

"Reading documentation could be simplified. Technical support could also be faster."

"The Cloud Provisioning Agent cannot provision a lot of the information that AD Connect does. For starters, the lightweight version cannot synchronize device information. If you have computers on-premises, the information about them will not be synchronized by the Cloud Provisioning Agent. In addition, if you have a user on the cloud and he changes his password, that information should be written back to the on-premises instance. But that workflow cannot be done with the lightweight agent. It can only be done with the more robust version."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"There is room for improvements when it comes to the licensing."

"If you buy direct, there is a minimum of 150 licenses that must be procured. The price point and barrier of entry is a little bit higher than it would be if you purchased the solution from an authorized reseller partner, rather than buying it and managing yourself."

"I expect usability features to become more refined over time. I'm interested to see how it evolves and continues to improve."

"There is room for improvement with the introduction of AI functionality."

"The Linux compatibility of this solution could be improved."

"When there are issues I would like remediation to be in one place."

"The solution lacks self-service on password reset. It also needs to improve its scalability."

"An improvement would be if there was an another way to manage the logs besides email because it's not so practical."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is very expensive. Its price should be lower. Price is the most important factor for Turkish people."

"Azure Active Directory is more expensive than Google, but the capabilities they provide are superior."

"Licensing costs for Microsoft Entra ID remain a concern, especially with the price increases in 2023."

"It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it."

"It is not too expensive."

"It is a really nice tool and we have a license for the more complex model."

"Entra ID is not too bad, but Microsoft licensing generally is insane. Most customers normally buy a bundle license with Microsoft 365, E3, or E5. Out of our 2,000 customers, for 99.9% of our customers, the Entra ID license that they are getting through the part of that would be sufficient. There are some more advanced ones that give you a bit more functionality, but we probably have not had a customer for that. We do not even internally use that ourselves. When you buy the Entra ID license on its own, it is probably three or four pounds. You just get it included in the license."

"The licensing costs are yearly. There is a standard fee per user."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"There is a license for this solution and we are on an annual license. The price is reasonable."

"The tool's price is fair."

"This solution is reasonably priced. I would rate it a nine out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Our experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Entra ID involves leveraging Microsoft 365 E5 licensing, so it's included. Being included in Microsoft licensing makes it mu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Netwrix Auditor?

The most valuable features of Netwrix Auditor are its affordability compared to similar products and its comprehensive monitoring of admin activities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netwrix Auditor?

The pricing of Netwrix Auditor varies based on the number of users and devices in our environment, but it is generally very cost-effective compared to other solutions. We don't pay for licenses sep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netwrix Auditor?

The solution currently meets my needs, but there is room for improvement with the introduction of AI functionality as suggested by the vendor. Additionally, expanding capabilities like database act...

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Wazuh vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 13% of the time

Change Auditor for Active Directory vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 13% of the time

ManageEngine ADAudit Plus vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 13% of the time

Lepide vs Netwrix Auditor

Compared 10% of the time

More Netwrix Auditor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

August 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Netwrix Auditor

August 2025

Download Netwrix Auditor product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

No data available

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Netwrix

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Netwrix Auditor is a security-focused solution that monitors IT environments by tracking changes, ensuring compliance, and enhancing visibility into user activities. It offers detailed auditing, real-time alerts, and robust reporting tools. Its intuitive interface and comprehensive features boost efficiency, productivity, and organizational growth.

Netwrix

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

AT&T, SanDisk, Siemens, Verizon, Electrolux, Allianz, Societe Generale

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Netwrix Auditor

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. Netwrix Auditor

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. Netwrix Auditor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Netwrix Auditor report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.