OpenText Project and Portfolio Management and Microsoft Project Server are two competing products in the realm of project and portfolio management solutions. Microsoft Project Server seems to have an upper hand due to its integration with Microsoft tools and robust project tracking capabilities.
Features: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers robust scenario comparison, integration, workflow features, real-time data metrics, and integration with various modules for comprehensive decision-making. Microsoft Project Server is known for seamless integration with Microsoft tools, ease of use, excellent project tracking, and detailed scheduling capabilities.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management requires enhancements in resource management, portfolio planning, and user experience, along with reducing its reliance on Oracle databases. Microsoft Project Server could benefit from improved collaborative capabilities, better integration with third-party tools like Jira, and a reduction in cost to enhance accessibility for small and medium enterprises.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management supports mainly on-premises deployment, and its customer service reportedly needs improvement. Microsoft Project Server offers a variety of deployment options including cloud capabilities and generally receives better customer service ratings, though complexities in deployment and support interactions exist.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Project and Portfolio Management, while reasonably priced for its features, may encounter high initial setup costs that could be burdensome for smaller businesses. Microsoft Project Server, despite being cost-effective due to its integration and management strengths, still has a higher price that may pose challenges for individual users. Both products are regarded as capable investments if aligned with user needs.
Microsoft Project provides significant return on investment through time savings, enhanced visibility, real-time reporting, and risk mitigation for projects.
Their support tends to decline when not supporting cloud solutions.
It's challenging to navigate, often making it necessary to search for solutions externally.
Communication with two people, one was knowledgeable while the other was learning.
The desktop version does not have scalability.
Microsoft Project Server is fully scalable and is widely used in many industries.
I have never had to reach out to their support because the product works as expected.
While it is generally stable, there is still some room for improvement.
Exporting data from Microsoft Project, especially Gantt charts, is overly complex and not user-friendly.
Microsoft has become increasingly expensive, and there seems to be a push towards cloud solutions which can be challenging for some.
The lack of collaboration capabilities on the desktop version, unlike the cloud version, is a limitation.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management could improve in several areas such as portfolio planning and resource allocation.
Microsoft Project Server is on the expensive side due to high licensing costs.
Considering the infrastructure commitments to SharePoint and SQL, the implementation costs are low if already set up.
Microsoft's products are expensive for individuals.
It is not overly expensive and provides a fair value for the features offered.
The dashboards are amazing for data crunching and provide a project focus with upcoming predictions, including burn-up and burn-down charts.
The Gantt chart is also a very powerful tool for a visual presentation of sequences, critical paths, and execution processes, which simplifies comprehension for users.
This setup allows for comprehensive reporting and management across multiple projects and portfolios.
The workflow is amazing and highly effective in streamlining processes.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Project Server | 4.1% |
| OpenText Project and Portfolio Management | 3.1% |
| Other | 92.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Microsoft Project Server streamlines project management with features like resource allocation, project scheduling, and SharePoint integration. It's valued for its intuitive interface and ability to provide comprehensive insights through advanced reporting and dashboards.
Designed to enhance collaboration and efficiency, Microsoft Project Server supports complex task management by integrating seamlessly with SharePoint. It offers tools like Gantt charts and timeline management for effective tracking. Users benefit from Excel and Power BI compatibility, enhancing analytical capabilities. Despite its powerful functionalities, users identify areas for improvement in tool integration, resource management, and collaboration features. There are calls for a modernized interface and more flexible pricing. While the cloud version boasts continuous updates, the on-premises model lags behind.
What are the main features of Microsoft Project Server?Microsoft Project Server finds its application across industries by providing tools for planning IT infrastructure and managing enterprise-level projects. It helps organizations document projects and manage portfolios, enabling clear visibility into performance through milestones and KPIs.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management provides user-friendly interfaces with seamless integration into tools like Jira. It enhances real-time visibility, resource planning, demand management, and workflow automation for more effective project tracking aligned with business goals.
OpenText Project and Portfolio Management offers extensive customization and reporting capabilities. It integrates effortlessly with platforms like Jira and Microsoft Project, offering real-time data visibility for improved decision-making. While its strengths in resource planning, demand management, and financial oversight stand out, users highlight the need for improved chargeback integration, enriched reporting capabilities, and more efficient license management. The platform aids in managing project delivery, investment, resource management, and financial forecasts, with modules for time tracking and reporting management ensuring transparency and governance.
What are the key features of OpenText Project and Portfolio Management?OpenText Project and Portfolio Management is widely used across industries for resource and demand management, handling project delivery, capacity, and financial forecasts. Entities incorporate diverse modules like time and defect tracking to ensure governance and tailor the platform to meet project management requirements, collaborating closely with developers for effective testing and implementation.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
