Microsoft Project vs Planisware comparison

"Time tracking and budget tracking are the most valuable features of the solution."

"One of the best features is that it is easy to use."

"The Gantt chart view is great."

"Microsoft offers good support."

"The solution is well established and runs very accurately."

"Microsoft Project is easy to use and helps our teams visualize the evolution of our projects."

"We have not had any problems with Microsoft's technical support. We are happy with the support."

"The setup is pretty simple."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"Overall, our company has all disintegrated systems, and with Planisware, we are getting a very integrated view of my portfolio reporting, cost and load, and everything else."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"I would like to see both Time and Team based options improved."

"I'd like the solution to be less expensive."

"Collaboration is an area that needs improvements."

"Could be more user-friendly, and forecasting could be better."

"The packaging of Microsoft Project Professional is pretty simple as a product. But, the end-to-end enterprise is complex."

"Planview FLEX licensing gives us a central repository where all the projects are stored so you can check the finances, resources, etc. It's quite useful to have everything connected. We don't have that for Microsoft Project. It's disconnected. The reporting capabilities could also be better, especially with finance and resources. Everybody complains about reports. That's why we need another tool."

"It is a traditional Waterfall-based solution, so it doesn't lend itself particularly well to Agile development. You can record Agile sprints within it, but it is not really an Agile-based product. It can store the basic information about budgets that an Agile set of work is looking to use, but that's about it."

"I have no idea about the cost because it is a corporate decision."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"Microsoft Project is an expensive solution."

"We purchase perpetual licenses due to the high cost of subscriptions, which are about 1,000 Australian dollars."

"The licensing model is somewhat complex."

"The pricing is based on a licensing model and is reasonable."

"I am not aware of any additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees of the solution."

"I do not have personal experience with pricing or licensing of this product."

"I am not involved with this."

"The solution has a decent annual license subscription cost, which is not high."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"There are training and certification costs."

"It comes with a high cost."