Microsoft Project vs Planisware comparison

"The integration between SharePoint and Power BI has been great."

"The reporting and national resource capacity planning are the most valuable features."

"The tool helps us to check milestones. After doing tasks, our team updates them. Regarding functionalities in Microsoft Project, the number one feature is reminders. With so many projects, sometimes you forget; some projects might slip up or disappear. This feature is very useful."

"It can auto-connect based on the dates, which makes it easy. It auto-assigns people, and when you're starting to type in, it auto-fills and populates for you, which is great. It provides little time savers when you're typing everything out."

"It has a nice interface that aligns with Excel and Word."

"The built-in dashboards are powerful because they show both project and overall progress."

"We use Microsoft Project for its timeline and task management capabilities. The primary advantage is the easy application of tasks in sequence, confirming dependencies, and establishing relationships between tasks. It simplifies handling conditions, significant dates, and dependencies between various tasks."

"Resource leveling is very useful. We like this feature. We like to be able to expand tasks and look at different resources and tasks usages. It is good at assigning tasks to teams. It is pretty compliant with the Project Management Institute approach, which is useful for being comprehensive. It allows us to make little Gantt charts and network diagrams."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"The new version has made it a bit more complicated."

"Microsoft's solution isn't really a collaboration tool, however. If you need a collaboration tool, you can use Slack, which can be integrated with your JIRA."

"There needs to be better integration with other Microsoft products such as SharePoint, and the like."

"We'd like the solution to have better integration with other third-party and open-source solutions."

"The Microsoft license is relatively expensive."

"The solution is a basic tool that does not give you analytical insights. It does not have any AI capabilities which can also help to plan."

"Its price can be improved."

"It's hard to reach technical people to get the help you need."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"The learning curve is steep and there could be more avenues for opening up learning materials to a broader audience, enabling individuals to gain practical experience with the tool."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"The solution is expensive."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I am not aware of any additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees of the solution."

"I do not remember the exact cost we paid but usually, they charge per user per month."

"The solution has a decent annual license subscription cost, which is not high."

"The license fees for the professional version, which is estimated to be approximately $1,600, and the standard version, which is approximately $1,200, may be considered expensive by some users. This is something that could be improved to make the platform more accessible to a wider audience."

"It was a three-year license deal that was reconciled on a quarterly basis. It is a reasonably priced product, and I consider that we got good value for money."

"We have to pay for a yearly license for Microsoft Project."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"It comes with a high cost."