Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Zaloni Data Platform comparison

Microsoft and Zaloni are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8, while Zaloni is ranked #38. Microsoft holds a 13.8% mindshare in DG, compared to Zaloni’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Zaloni users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Read 59 Microsoft Purview Data Governance reviews

14,875 Views
12,495 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Zaloni Data Platform

Read 2 Zaloni Data Platform reviews

396 Views
309 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Zaloni Data Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Zaloni Data Platform and Microsoft Purview Data Governance are competing in the data governance sector. Zaloni is recognized for its flexible pricing and support services, while Microsoft Purview is favored for its wide-ranging features.

Features: Zaloni Data Platform offers data cataloging, lineage tracking, and integration capabilities with agile data management customization. Microsoft Purview provides cloud-native tools, advanced data mapping, and automation, with seamless integration within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zaloni Data Platform features a user-friendly deployment model and effective support. Microsoft Purview offers streamlined integration with Microsoft services but may require more complex initial configuration; however, it benefits from strong customer service from Microsoft.

Pricing and ROI: Zaloni Data Platform is characterized by flexible and competitive pricing with a potential high ROI due to lower operational expenses. Microsoft Purview, while possibly entailing higher setup costs, delivers significant ROI through its extensive features for businesses already invested in Microsoft, balancing initial costs with improved efficiency and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. Zaloni Data Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. Zaloni Data Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Data Gove...

Ranking in Data Governance

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Zaloni Data Platform

Ranking in Data Governance

38th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Preparation Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Governance is 13.8%, down from 21.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zaloni Data Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Governance	13.8%
Zaloni Data Platform	0.6%
Other	85.6%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Ayinampudi Srikanth

Tech lead at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Automated data discovery has streamlined management while configuration remains complex

Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI. The interface feels a little complicated compared to Big-ID. I did not appreciate the configuration part. It felt complex, whereas when I went for a Big-ID demo, the interface looked better and was easier to understand for any user.

Read full review

reviewer1476264

Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Solid multi-ingestion tool but with poor exception handling

The major pain point with Zaloni is that their exception handling is not good. If any event happens (an event is when the job stops in the middle of the process), it doesn't tell you at which point it failed and it doesn't tell the operations team how they should take corrective actions unless you call Zaloni and then identify the issues. That is one issue. Another issue is that sometimes your jobs fail and if you run it a second time, it will go through. A third area it could be improved is the deployment process. When you want to deploy anything, it has a lot of manual processes. For example, you have to create your password in an encrypted format, and then you have to use a lot of manual deployment process. They should actually be building something else, like using Jenkins or automating their process. I have suggested to them that they have to improve their deployment process because they want everyone to run a manual deployment. It takes a lot of time, about half a day, for any single deployment. Then test it, then it might not work, and then reverting back is not easy because of the manual deployment process. I think in recent versions they added a lot of upgrades and additional features including a lot of integrations. Before it was just AWS, later they extended it to Azure. I'm not sure how they have extended it to GCP. It has some built-in features and a lot of improvements now because the UI and the features were not easy to navigate. Regarding showing the metrics, it's okay. I will say it's neither easy nor hard, there is whatever is required. Lastly, on the governance side, it's not very good. We faced some issues with the Ranger version. Ranger was an authentication tool on big data and Zaloni had some compatibility issues with the Ranger at that time. Later they said those are all going to be resolved, but at that time it had some issues. I'm not sure whether it was working with the Sentry or not.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The labeling is the most valuable feature for the companies I'm installing it for. Some of them have several thousand staff, and their concerns are around confidential or private data being shared. The labels and the policies involved with them give them that initial visibility."

"The user interface is highly intuitive and user-friendly."

"The DLP part and the AI related ones are the most valuable features; I mostly appreciate their automated data discovery."

"The ability to classify data quickly and effortlessly is arguably Microsoft Purview's most valuable feature."

"The integration ecosystem with Microsoft Purview is the most valuable aspect."

"It starts off with records management, insider risk management, and information protection. And there is the discovery of the clouds, and we can get analytics on that as well, so that we know which user is using which cloud application and for how much time. The Activity explorer tells us which user was transferring out what data at what moment and on which device, including the serial number."

"The most important aspect is our vision to create a data marketplace and Data Governance policies."

"I don't know if I've gotten much value out of Purview personally, but our security team loves it. Our biggest concern is leakage or theft of our data because we have a lot of PII and stuff that has not been released. We like the insights Purview provides and the way the solution can track and manage things. I'd say that was probably their favorite piece of it so far. From everything the security team has told me, the policy management and DLP features are working spectacularly."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to map data and write workflows with logic inside them."

"You can create a lot of ingestions based on the file levels or based on the time."

Cons

"Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI."

"The product must provide better integrations with OS X and iOS."

"We haven't really gotten too far into it to identify areas for improvement just yet."

"While Purview's data connector platform can ingest information from non-Microsoft data sources, it is slow to do so and the information may become outdated."

"Compared to Big-ID, Microsoft Purview Data Governance looks complicated to me. I do not feel it has a good user-level UI."

"Although you can explore the data, that creates a great interest in data lineage or the data flow. How does it go from a source to a platform to a Power BI report, for example? It is possible, to some extent, to see that with Purview, but the lineage feature requires some manual work on the development side or more work from Microsoft to improve on it."

"While Microsoft Purview currently allows weekly scans for data sources, this limitation hinders the usefulness of the tool for frequently changing data."

"It could reduce pricing to encourage usage."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance cons

"Technical support is in need of improvement."

"The major pain point with Zaloni is that their exception handling is not good. If any event happens, it doesn't tell you at which point it failed and it doesn't tell the operations team how they should take corrective actions unless you call Zaloni and then identify the issues. That is one issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable considering its value."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is not cheap."

"Microsoft Purview is expensive."

"Licensing is frustrating due to multiple modules and licenses. The feature might be available in the console, but it won't work without the proper license, creating confusion."

"Microsoft Purview has a pay-per-use pricing model, so it's one of the most cost-effective tools, as your cost will be based on your usage. It's a pricing model that Microsoft has nailed down, making it great whether you're a small organization or a multinational, giant organization."

"The pricing depends on the client's requirements and the number of applications."

"I consider it cost-efficient because of the metrics it provides."

"Microsoft Purview is priced in the middle. It isn't the cheapest, but it isn't the most expensive. It's affordable compared to other public cloud services."

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	31

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Purview?

It is designed to seamlessly connect to various data sources, which is particularly beneficial for our customers who primarily use Microsoft technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Purview?

Microsoft Purview Data Governance is quite affordable compared to other market solutions, which have high initial costs. It allows for a cost-effective start with negligible initial cost. However, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Purview?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Collibra Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 18% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 16% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 9% of the time

Atlan vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

BigID Next vs Microsoft Purview Data Governance

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Competitors

Collibra Platform vs Zaloni Data Platform

Compared 69% of the time

Alteryx vs Zaloni Data Platform

Compared 31% of the time

More Zaloni Data Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance

January 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Governance report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Governance product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

January 2026

Download Zaloni Data Platform product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Purview, MS Azure Purview

ZDP

Overview

The new Microsoft Purview portal offers an enhanced governance experience, serving as a unified platform for managing and governing data across various sources, including Azure, Microsoft 365, on-premises, and multicloud environments. Designed to streamline governance, compliance, risk, and security efforts, the new portal provides a user-friendly interface and unlocks advanced features like live view and preset scans. Existing users of Microsoft Purview can upgrade to this enhanced experience, gaining access to improved user interface, enhanced capabilities, and consolidated management of data assets. Additionally, the upgrade sets the stage for future developments, including account consolidation and fine-grained access control.

Microsoft

Zaloni simplifies big data for transformative business insights. We work with pioneering enterprises to modernize their data architecture and operationalize their data to accelerate insights for everyday business practices.

Zaloni

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

CDS Global, AIG,

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. Zaloni Data Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. Zaloni Data Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. Zaloni Data Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. Zaloni Data Platform report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.