No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Reduxio [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
The compared Mimecast and Reduxio solutions aren't in the same category. Mimecast is ranked #3 in DLP , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 2.8% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 99% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Reduxio users who would recommend it.
Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...
Read 97 Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection reviews
  • 11,966 Views
  • 6,462 Comparison Views
99% willing to recommend
Reduxio [EOL]
Read 26 Reduxio [EOL] reviews
    100% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection and Reduxio [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Mimecast and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: October 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
    October 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    Mimecast Insider Risk Manag...
    Average Rating
    9.0
    Reviews Sentiment
    7.2
    Number of Reviews
    97
    Ranking in other categories
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (3rd)
    Reduxio [EOL]
    Average Rating
    9.8
    Number of Reviews
    26
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    External Ganesh - PeerSpot reviewer
    External Ganesh
    Security Engineer at Comcast
    Insider threats have been detected faster and internal data exposure is now controlled
    Regarding how Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection can be improved, sometimes the tool is slightly laggy, wherein it would take some time for us to fetch the related logs from the Mimecast portal, and that of course can be improved. There could also be a graph or a kind of a graph where, if the organization has a smaller number of employees, it is fine, but if it has a large number of employees and different departments, then in that case, Mimecast could give us an AI suggestion upon how to improvise the current security posture, how we stand and where we can go up to in terms of implementing or tweaking the policies. As the organization's size gets bigger, it would also be better if Mimecast could provide some solutions upon how to segregate the users into groups and what groups can have which policies. Those kinds of features can be added. Regarding Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's AI capabilities, I think its governance and security could improve as I am not entirely sure how it works. It would be helpful if Mimecast could, as the AI capabilities are in place, maintain a strict governance policy upon the data that is being processed, especially for user personally identifiable information. As insider risk management sometimes also gets into the personal details of the user, organizations might be hesitant; even we are also hesitant to use the AI capabilities. If Mimecast could provide more information about how they store the data and whether the agents are local agents or cloud-hosted agents, that would be of great help for the organizations to consider its AI capabilities while adhering to the compliance needs of a particular organization.
    Read full review
    ITAdmini18be - PeerSpot reviewer
    ITAdmini18be
    IT Administrator at a government with 51-200 employees
    Point-in-time restore capabilities are built into the storage appliance
    Our first impression when we were introduced to the product was very good. I still think it's very good. They are truly different. The whole product is based on point-in-time restore capabilities built into their storage appliance, and no one else I know does that. I'd rate it a 10 out of 10 because it does everything that we have asked it to do.
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "We deployed the tool in our organization so that now we have more control over the user's activities within our organization, and the quick alerting also helped us in minimizing the internal data exposure."
    "The product just always has a continuous backup going, which is quite useful for us."
    "Code42 has excellent customer support."
    "One of the most stable software packages I have worked with in my 20 years in IT."
    "So far we've saved a lot of data and prevented loss for some clients that either had their devices stolen or the hard drive had failed."
    "Since it is a SaaS platform, software updates and security enhancements are managed by Mimecast, and I highly recommend Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection for email security."
    "Customer Service: I won't even bother rating them because they are in a class of their own."
    "It's probably the best backup tool available, but that's just my opinion."
    More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection pros
    "Reduxio offers a very simple, elegant user interface (design) to manage it."
    "The always-on deduplication and compression is also effective and allows us to achieve about 3x savings on space utilization."
    "We are able to recover to the second, if needed, our data. This greatly improves restore capability, for example, if there is a cryptolocker outbreak or data loss."
    "The performance increase is significant over our replaced storage, our servers respond lightning fast and the end user experience has greatly improved."
    "The ability to target existing remote storage with NoRestore is going to allow us to leverage existing storage without an increased financial investment."
    "We are getting 4.4:1 data reduction, which means we will be able to squeeze over 120TB into 2U. This is more than enough capacity for us."
    "We are enjoying a quantum leap in speed, reliability, and available space with this system."
    "By using the BackDating option we can restore volumes based on time. It also reduces volumes and maintenance time."
    More Reduxio [EOL] pros
     

    Cons

    "The GUI could use improvement, but generally it's fine."
    "I would rate Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection an eight out of ten because we need improvements in policies, and although I am not aware of other organizations' experiences, we are facing some lags, and there are points we must work on."
    "It's very user friendly...when it works."
    "This is my only major issue with Code42 at this point."
    "I'd like to see some better options with account management in the software and a simpler way to track where you are using licenses."
    "The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions."
    "The login screen for customers could be improved, I find that the white and grey could be hard to read for some customers depending on the brightness of their screens."
    "My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that pricing is always very expensive."
    More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection cons
    "It would be helpful to have a mobile app to monitor the storage array remotely."
    "There is only thing I can think of at the moment, that would be detailed printable reports."
    "It would be helpful to have the ability to recover virtual machines individually without having to restore the full LUN."
    "I am waiting on a feature set in the new version which should allow me to replicate between Reduxio iSCSI SANs for disaster recovery and also to 3rd party iSCSI SANs which are cheaper for an archive or DR target."
    "We had a brief hiccup, a brief outage, during one upgrade process, but it wasn't too extreme."
    "Would love to have role-based access and an active directory integration."
    "Needs to be made easier to use with slightly older versions of VMware."
    "I would love to see deeper integration with VMware vSphere/vCenter. Right now, I can edit existing Reduxio datastore sizes in the vSphere web client. Provisioning new datastores that way would be nice."
    More Reduxio [EOL] cons
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
    "It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."
    "They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."
    "It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."
    "The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
    "For less money than my previous solution, I receive way more performance and backup features that far surpass anything on the market."
    "Setup and licensing are included in the solution cost."
    "​The advantage of using HDDs to store (versus pure flash) makes the price point attractive versus other options.​​"
    "I think it is worth the value."
    "Only one device is sold. Negotiate the initial storage, but you can start small and move up with ease. Negotiate."
    "They have very competitive pricing and were able to work within our budget constraints as a public school."
    "Set up costs are minimal. We were early adopters so we received really good pricing."
    "They are very competitive in pricing, so I would definitely recommend Reduxio."
    More Reduxio [EOL] pricing and cost advice
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    15%
    Manufacturing Company
    11%
    Outsourcing Company
    11%
    Construction Company
    9%
    Financial Services Firm
    20%
    Construction Company
    19%
    Outsourcing Company
    14%
    Manufacturing Company
    9%
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business33
    Midsize Enterprise30
    Large Enterprise44
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business10
    Midsize Enterprise7
    Large Enterprise4
     

    Questions from the Community

    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
    I am unsure about Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection's pricing, setup costs, and licensing details. However, I know that licensing details are user-specific according to the licen...
    See all answers
    What advice do you have for others considering Code42 Next-Gen DLP?
    My advice for those looking at Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection is to compare your use case comprehensively. Do not just rely on reviews, as they offer communal insight; evaluat...
    See all answers
    What needs improvement with Code42 Incydr?
    A con to mention is that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection, at times, may not capture everything. For instance, the time that Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection...
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 9% of the time
    NetVault Plus vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    NetVault Plus vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 7% of the time
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 5% of the time
    Teramind vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Teramind vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 5% of the time
    Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Logo
    Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) vs Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    Compared 4% of the time
    More Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection Competitors
    IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    IBM FlashSystem 9100 NVMe vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 20% of the time
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 18% of the time
    Dell PowerMax vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    Dell PowerMax vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 18% of the time
    Dell SC Series vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    Dell SC Series vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 9% of the time
    SolidFire vs Reduxio [EOL] Logo
    SolidFire vs Reduxio [EOL]
    Compared 2% of the time
    More Reduxio [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection
    October 2026
    Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection reportDownload Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection product report
    Buyer's Guide
    Reduxio [EOL]
    October 2026
    Reduxio [EOL] reportDownload Reduxio [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    Mimecast Incydr, Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
    No data available
     

    Overview

    Mimecast Incydr protects organizations against insider risk and data exfiltration, whether accidental, negligent, or malicious. It monitors endpoint, cloud, browser, and email activity to see when files move to places you don't trust, without requiring policies, proxies, or content classification to work. Administrators get a single dashboard for data flow visibility, adaptive controls ranging from education to blocking, and integrations with HR, endpoint detection, and identity systems to automate response as risk changes.

    What key features should users explore?

    • Shadow AI Visibility: Sees uploads, pastes, and prompts into GenAI tools like ChatGPT and Claude across endpoint and browser, with no policies required.
    • Adaptive Controls: Applies the right level of protection per user and scenario, from in-the-moment education (Instructor) to real-time blocking of paste, uploads, or removable media.
    • Departing Employee Monitoring: Automatically watchlists offboarding employees through HCM integrations (Workday, BambooHR, and others) the moment HR confirms departure.
    • Risk Prioritization (PRISM): Prioritizes incidents using hundreds of risk indicators based on data sensitivity, user behavior, and destination.
    • Block by Source/Destination: Blocks sensitive data (source code, financial systems, HR data) from reaching unsanctioned destinations, without writing regex-based policies.

    What benefits can impact ROI?

    • Faster Investigation: Reduces time to investigate high-risk incidents by 50%, verified by Forrester Total Economic Impact (TEI) research.
    • Low Administrative Overhead: Half of customers spend less than 4 hours a week on administration, without dedicated headcount.
    • Proven Return: 172% ROI and under 6-month payback, independently verified by Forrester TEI.
    • Automated Offboarding Security: HCM integrations remove manual handoffs between HR and security during the highest-risk period of employment.
    • Reduced Tool Sprawl: Combines DLP, CASB, and UEBA-style visibility in a single lightweight endpoint agent.

    Industries and use cases

    Mimecast Incydr is used across industries to address insider risk, departing employee data theft, and shadow AI exposure. Enterprises use it to monitor data movement across endpoint, cloud, and browser channels, automate watchlisting during employee offboarding, and gain visibility into how employees and AI tools interact with sensitive data, supporting both security operations and compliance requirements in regulated industries.

    Mimecast

    Reduxio's HX550 flash hybrid storage arrays, based on Reduxio's TimeOS storage operating system allow you to recover application data to any second in the past, eliminates most of the complexity associated with managing storage, and provides exceptional performance and efficiency, far exceeding anything available today.

    Reduxio
     

    Sample Customers

    Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
    Array Networks, Barnstable Police Department, Catbird, Dingley Press, El Dorado County Office of Education, One Workplace
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
    October 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Mimecast and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: October 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.