NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] comparison

Nakivo and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 99% of Nakivo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Read 94 NAKIVO Backup & Replication reviews

7,602 Views
6,234 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Quest Rapid Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication compete in the backup and recovery software category. NAKIVO appears to have the upper hand due to its affordability and a comprehensive range of features.

Features: Quest Rapid Recovery is recognized for its granular recovery options, ease of use, and ability to restore servers within minutes. It supports both physical and virtual server backups and allows mounting backups as drives. NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers strong ransomware protection, email recovery, and a user-friendly interface. It supports multiple environments like VMware, Hyper-V, and cloud storage.

Room for Improvement: Quest Rapid Recovery needs enhancements in GUI lag, support for Mac clients and tape backups, and better snapshot retention management in Hyper-V environments. Users also call for improved space management and faster technical support. NAKIVO users suggest enhanced reporting, UI refinements, better integration with other virtual environments, and more comprehensive cloud provider support. NAKIVO's deduplication and encryption functions also require optimization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest Rapid Recovery is mostly deployed on-premises and is praised for competent technical support, though response times are inconsistent. NAKIVO Backup & Replication provides hybrid and on-premises deployment options, noted for its straightforward setup and cost-effectiveness. Despite mixed reviews, NAKIVO's customer support is regarded as efficient and responsive.

Pricing and ROI: Quest Rapid Recovery is considered expensive, especially when additional storage or features are needed. However, users still find value in its data recovery capabilities. NAKIVO Backup & Replication is praised for its cost-effectiveness and clear licensing model, making it attractive for smaller businesses. Both products deliver ROI based on security and reliability rather than direct financial savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (13th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (11th)

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

EDERLEY TERRERO

Business Consulting at Gestion IT

Robust data protection has safeguarded mailboxes and disaster recovery for our clients

NAKIVO Backup & Replication has released many updates lately and at this point it works excellently. Needs will always appear, particularly around the AI topic and other things that come out over time. I understand that solutions always have to keep moving forward, but so far I see it as excellent.I give it a nine because nothing is perfect. There are always solutions, and NAKIVO Backup & Replication is a tool that adapts perfectly to certain needs. However, we cannot dismiss that there are powerful solutions on the market that have been around for much longer. I rate it a nine because we can always improve.

Read full review

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Granular recovery, replication is good and offers good speed

It is for any kind of company that uses their own servers. From a global perspective, our clients are small-sized companies. All the SMEs, compared to the Slovakian market, are quite small. It's a small market with small companies. They just want to enhance security and follow regulations It's…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Nakivo, similar to Veeam Backup, gives you peace of mind and confidence in your virtual infrastructure."

"For the most part, I don't have anything I'd change for this small type of environment."

"It is a cost-effective solution with an easy-to-configure user-friendly interface."

"Nakivo has improved our organization largely due to the fact that it is an extremely robust backup system and comes with a replication module that allows us to safeguard mission-critical servers, applied on several sites by us with fantastic results as it becomes a great Plan B in case of a hardware failure or an outage of a primary system."

"Four times the reduction in the cost of our vSphere backups, which provides the base features required for our environment."

"The enterprise version is a solid product with good support, a lot of features, and a helpful knowledge base."

"The features that we like the most are the Backup Copy and Active Directory Integration. They have helped us to save a lot of time since we do not have to make the backup copies “by hand”."

"There are many license types and levels so that every customer can find the right balance between cost and features."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pros

"The solution offers a 100% guarantee that if it's backed up you will be able to restore it onto any platform you want."

"Not having to switch tapes is wonderful. It makes it so easy. We have an on-prem deployment that we also replicate to an offsite replication host. So by not having to deal with tapes and moving them off-site every day and every week, that's amazing ease of use for us."

"The local mount utility is most valuable. I do restores fairly regularly. Thankfully, I have not ever lost an entire server that I've had to resurrect, but I certainly have people who erroneously saved over a file or have deleted a file. So, we've done that quite a bit. We still have the DL4000 appliance, and we had, kind of, extrapolated that out over a five-year period. Now, we're in year six, so we had to add storage, which we did as a SAN next to DL4000, but prior to adding in that extra storage, we, here and there, would run into situations where for whatever reason, it would want to be pulling a new base image, and then we would run out of storage. So, we would utilize the archive feature and archive the old data that we want to hang on to, but we don't necessarily need it taking up current data storage. Being able to export out really old data is most valuable to us. Then, we just store that on a NAS that we keep in another building."

"The compression and deduplication features have helped to save on storage costs."

"Built-in encryption helps to secure our data as it travels from our on-site server to our off-site backup server."

"Disk backup (archiving to the cloud) is its most valuable feature because it provides for our disaster recovery plan."

"It has surpassed our expectations time and time again."

"It is pretty simple to set up and use, the ease of use has reduced the administration time involved in our backup and recovery operations, and I can sleep easily at night knowing that I've got one of the best solutions in place for the school."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

Cons

"In the press releases, it would be useful to make sure that the manual space reclaim procedure does not have to be performed but that it happens automatically, thus optimizing the use of space."

"The interface can be a little clunky at times."

"The only thing we have encountered that we would like to see improved in the future are error messages. They could be more detailed and helpful, without the need to send logs to support. Failing that, the part of the log related to the error could be displayed alongside the error message, so I can investigate the error without looking through all of those logs that I'm able to download."

"It could be a little bit faster in terms of backup and offer more reliable SQL server backups."

"Some VM backup jobs hang periodically and cannot be stopped, except by restarting the Nakivo Director node."

"I would love to see compatibility with KVM Backup."

"It is missing the file and folder backup; however, this product is meant for virtual machine backup and recovery, so that is really outside of the scope of the software."

"In terms of what could be improved for the next release, I would probably answer better documentation and licensing models."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication cons

"The initial setup can be tricky, and if not done right, the whole solution needs to be reinstalled."

"One area where Quest Rapid Recovery has room for improvement is in the handling of snapshots on Hyper-V."

"In terms of what needs improvement in Quest Rapid Recovery, though the solution is seamless, right now, they are just giving the software which means we'll need to arrange the hardware. If they can combine the appliance and software, that would be a great approach. In the next release of Quest Rapid Recovery, it would be great if they'd add a folder backup feature because only a snapshot backup feature is available at the moment."

"The on-premises deployment model shouldn't have a maintenance fee. If there's going to be technical support, they need it to be free or it should be paid on upon adopting the solution."

"Rapid Recovery can only backup the machine or disc, but it can't back up from folders, and files, and things like that."

"It's buggy. That's a big problem. We're arranging to get rid of it. We're going to switch to Veeam."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support. I would like to see faster response time."

"There could be better space management for incremental data. When you use incremental data, the space in the appliance keeps on going up. There should be a better way to manage the space. You have to manage the incremental data to reduce the time."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a very good price in the market."

"You have a lot of different options when it comes to pricing and the pricing models are pretty flexible and affordable."

"I think the price is competitive. However, for some projects, it can be a bit much for price-sensitive small businesses."

"Nakivo has a good price-performance ratio."

"Nakivo Backup & Replication also have another great value, which is that it is one of the lowest prices on the market."

"The price could be lower."

"The solution's pricing is adequate for its features and quality."

"Regarding the licensing, I would advise speaking to the Nakivo representatives and you can get the best option for your environment."

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication pricing and cost advice

"When I purchased the change to the license, it was $1,600. I think that was for changing the license. I don't believe that I had to purchase technical support in a while, so I must've bought maybe for five years, but I don't feel there was a huge cost involved in technical support. Its cost was definitely worth it because we've had a fantastic experience with them."

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

"Its price is okay. It is reasonable in terms of the way it works."

"I believe the basic license comes with six terabytes, whereas a lot of the other ones are four terabytes. From the price point, it seemed a lot better than the comparative models, such as Datto, Barracuda, and some of the others. I believe Barracuda was about $15,000 for four terabytes, and Quest was around $12,000 for six terabytes. Pricing is based on the period. There is just the maintenance fee that you have to pay annually, or you can pay for a three-year or four-year contract. This includes Premier Support."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

"It is a little expensive. However, I haven't compared it to other solutions. Being a nonprofit, it is always good to have nonprofit discounts on products."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it. They charge us per core and we have a six-core server. It's expensive to pay for maintenance charges. I want to switch to something cheaper."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	81
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?

Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that NAKIVO Backup & Replication is more price-efficient than other solutions, and we are satisfied with the pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nakivo?

Improving NAKIVO Backup & Replication involves addressing the hassle of choosing the right license level when starting out, especially with specific requirements, and the lack of macOS support ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Rapid Recovery?

Dell solutions are approximately 30% to 35% more expensive than Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Rapid Recovery?

The product is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Rapid Recovery?

We have sold some of the products to our customers, mainly to remove competitors like Veeam and also other appliances that do not have the whole package integrated into just one appliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 9% of the time

Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

BDRShield vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication

Compared 3% of the time

More NAKIVO Backup & Replication Competitors

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Iron Mountain Connect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Unitrends vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAKIVO Backup & Replication

July 2026

Download NAKIVO Backup & Replication product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

July 2026

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Dell AppAssure

Overview

NAKIVO Backup & Replication delivers rapid deployment and intuitive management across environments like Windows, Linux, and NAS. It is known for fast VM recovery, robust data protection, and cloud integration with competitive pricing.

NAKIVO Backup & Replication supports diverse IT landscapes, offering efficient deduplication, offsite backups, and policy-based replication. Its granular file restores, effective compression, and seamless cloud integration make it a preferred choice for minimizing downtime and enhancing business resilience. Users highlight its security measures, flexible deployment options, and automatic backups as core strengths. However, further enhancements in interface refinement, storage array integrations, and broadened support for virtual technologies and physical machine backups could enhance user satisfaction. Users seek improved control over alerts, better reporting capabilities, and optimized deduplication and compression.

What are the key features of NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Fast VM Recovery: Minimal downtime with quick restore options for virtual machines.
Deduplication & Compression: Efficient data storage through advanced deduplication techniques and compression.
Cloud Integration: Seamless operations with cloud platforms like AWS for flexible backup solutions.
Policy-Based Replication: Automated replication policies ensuring consistent and reliable data backup.
Granular File Restores: Restore specific files without needing full system recovery, saving time and resources.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating NAKIVO Backup & Replication?

Competitive Pricing: Cost-effective solution with robust features.
Ease of Use: Intuitive management for a hassle-free experience.
Reliable Performance: Consistent results in protecting and recovering data.
Strong Support: Responsive customer service catering to user needs.

In industries like technology and finance, NAKIVO Backup & Replication is essential for securing virtual environments such as VMware and Hyper-V. Its deployment on NAS devices and capability for offsite backups to cloud platforms like AWS are appreciated. Organizations utilize it for backup, replication, and recovery of virtual machines using daily and incremental methods, ensuring efficient data protection and disaster recovery processes.

Nakivo

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.