Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
Nintex Process Platform reduces maintenance costs, increases efficiency, and provides ROI within a year despite some cost concerns.
Sentiment score
8.1
OpenText 360 for SharePoint provided strong ROI through efficient document management and durable on-premises performance with 100% ROI achievement.
It eliminates the challenges associated with handling files on local servers and allows efficient document management.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Nintex Process Platform customer service is generally well-received, though users desire quicker assistance and note technical support limitations.
Sentiment score
6.8
OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides 24/7 highly-rated support, although resolution times vary with complexity and component differences.
I have not directly contacted vendor support but use forums for any queries or issues while utilizing OpenText 360 for SharePoint.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Nintex Process Platform is generally scalable, effective on Office 365, yet faces challenges with on-premises infrastructure and pricing.
Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is scalable for many users, though integration complexity sometimes limits its perceived scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Users generally praise Nintex Process Platform's stability, noting improvements, reliable performance, and minor disruptions, with ratings averaging seven to nine.
Sentiment score
7.2
Users praise OpenText 360 for SharePoint's stability and enhancements but note integration issues and room for feature improvement.
 

Room For Improvement

Enhancements needed in Nintex for usability, performance, integration, reporting, UI, deployment, AI integration, and support for custom code.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint needs improved UI, Office 365 integration, simpler licensing, better support, and enhanced performance features.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
Integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to specific individuals for follow-up.
The GUI should be improved for better user experience.
 

Setup Cost

Nintex Process Platform's subscription pricing is considered high compared to competitors, with significant costs for cloud-based user licensing.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is costly, with complex licensing, and receives moderate pricing satisfaction from users.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
Pricing is very affordable as it is part of the Office 365 suite, costing around five dollars per user.
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft.
 

Valuable Features

Nintex Process Platform offers scalable, no-code solutions with seamless integration, enhancing data management and workflow automation for enterprises.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration, customization, and security with flexible integration, automation, and multi-device accessibility.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers.
It offers automation capabilities with Power Automate, enabling automation of invoicing with API support from SAP.
 

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (11th)
OpenText 360 for SharePoint
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
27th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.3%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye - PeerSpot reviewer
Straightforward interface and user-friendly
There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.
Ravi Krishnan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive
OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Government
13%
Legal Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?
The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?
Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.
What needs improvement with K2?
The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
In terms of pricing, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is more expensive than Microsoft. On a scale of one to ten, I rate its price as six.
What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?
In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes. Specifically, integration with a feature like Planner could assist in assigning tasks to speci...
 

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)
Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.