Observer GigaStor vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Viavi Solutions and Splunk are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Viavi Solutions is ranked #84, while Splunk is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2. Viavi Solutions holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Splunk’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Viavi Solutions users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Observer GigaStor

Read 7 Observer GigaStor reviews

3,621 Views
2,317 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 106 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

32,936 Views
12,186 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Observer GigaStor

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Splunk Observability Cloud and Observer GigaStor are prominent tools in network monitoring and performance management. Splunk possesses an upper hand with quicker, scalable deployment while Observer GigaStor shines in in-depth network analysis.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time streaming analytics, AI-driven insights, and seamless integration with enterprise systems. Observer GigaStor provides precise network performance monitoring, packet capturing, and detailed analysis down to the packet level.

Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud could enhance features related to packet-level analysis, providing deeper insights akin to Observer GigaStor. Further optimization in on-premises deployment could make Observer GigaStor more competitive. Observer GigaStor might benefit from enhanced real-time analytics features and ease of integration with other enterprise tools, similar to Splunk.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud provides easy SaaS deployment and robust integration resources, facilitating quick setup. Observer GigaStor requires an on-premises installation that demands more configuration effort but offers reliable, dedicated customer support, noted for its hands-on approach.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk's subscription-based model offers scalability, potentially leading to higher costs with usage but allows flexibility. Observer GigaStor involves a higher upfront investment but provides a clear return on investment through its sophisticated analytics and detailed performance insights. Splunk appeals to customers prioritizing lower initial costs, while Observer GigaStor's detailed analytics justify its higher investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Observer GigaStor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Observer GigaStor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Observer GigaStor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (14th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (6th)

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

106

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), Container Management (10th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Observer GigaStor is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud	1.6%
Observer GigaStor	0.5%
Other	97.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Jeroen-Dubbelman

Director at Bitrate

Aids significantly in the threat-hunting process and provides a score-based evaluation of user experience

There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies. The retrospective network analysis capability of Observer GigaStor has been beneficial. It's a pivotal feature for network performance solutions. However, I prefer to consider the entire solution suite - GigaStor, along with GigaFlow and Apex - for comprehensive network visibility and monitoring. So, I prefer to integrate all three solutions to provide the best visibility. They complement each other well, with Apex aggregating and correlating data from both GigaStor and GigaFlow to enhance environmental understanding and troubleshooting efficiency.

Read full review

Purnambica Kolavennu

Project Manager at AGRICULTURE SKILL COUNCIL OF INDIA (ASCI)

Unified observability has improved real-time governance and now drives data-led decisions

Log Observer Connect is embedded here, but we are facing some delays in centralized log collection and analysis, which can be further fastened. We are collecting all the data metrics and decision-making insights, but all these data-driven decisions coming from different applications are not connected somewhere. A consolidated form or correlation of these insights is not happening between each other due to which we feel we are missing something significant. Some generalized feedback includes that predictive alerts or alarms which can be integrated with AI-driven alarms and alerting features should be established so that there is AI-driven intelligence and anomaly detection happening with a complete systematic process in service delivery. Application dependencies are huge, and business and operational dashboards should be improved. Right now there are very interactive custom dashboards, and every now and then, the personalization of enhancements keeps happening. KPI monitoring, executive reporting, and analytics have definitely been introduced to a great extent. There are few things in cloud-native monitoring, such as integration with AWS and Azure, where we sometimes do face lags. Those things can definitely be improved upon. I have used Datadog and Dynatrace before using Splunk Observability Cloud. Datadog was definitely recommended by most of our peers because of its very strong comprehensive observability and very strong and unique dashboard systems. Dynatrace was also very good because they have offered a lot of AI-driven analysis methods and processes, which was helping our organization a lot. Since our organization has a very strong IT ecosystem for agriculture, very different kinds of customized things are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Go take a look at it. It's a great product and has great capabilities."

"There are many valuable features, but understanding end-user response times stands out. It provides a score-based evaluation of user experience, helping customers quickly pinpoint whether issues originate from the network, server, client, or application. Additionally, it facilitates in-depth analysis of application dependencies."

"I have no regrets using this product, I am very satisfied for what I paid for it and for the things I am able to do with the product."

"If you have the opportunity, I would strongly encourage you to get it, because it makes the IT experience easier and more flexible, by providing the ability to see things in your networks like the directory packet label."

"The ability to capture packets. It is not only for monitoring. That is very important for a company that wants to keep an eye on the packets, the transactions, the flows..."

"I also have the ability to see an application's performance, to see what's going on, why a network is slow, why this program for this user is experiencing a delay or some network issue"

"Industry-leading line rates, packet-capture technology and data-mining capabilities are the most valuable features."

"It's able to capture packets and, after a long time, you can come and use that information; to check, to analyze - everything you would want to do. So it's very good and helpful if you want to protect your data. It is stored in a certain place where you can access it every time you want to analyze it."

More Observer GigaStor pros

"The tool is efficient in collecting, monitoring and evaluating logs."

"Once configured correctly, the analysis reporting the Splunk APM provides is better than that of the other APM tools."

"The most valuable features include user time tracking and the ability to analyze application load times."

"It can monitor, get the data, and then report on the data."

"The solution's most valuable aspect is its ability to get information about all of the security measurements in my environment."

"Splunk's dashboards are great."

"After implementing observability, I could see end-to-end transaction tracing and quickly identify where issues arose, which reduced troubleshooting time and improved overall application stability and availability for our customers and systems."

"It has positively impacted my organization in terms of observing different sorts of metrics and tracing across different applications, and it is really helpful."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"The Observer Console UI is consistent and stable, but could use some updating to be more modern."

"I would like to have more than 4TB of storage available in the portable version of this solution."

"GigaStor feeds into Apex. So, the area where there could be improvement would be in artificial intelligence. For example, the incorporation of more advanced machine learning or AI capabilities could enhance its functionality."

"The interface is pretty complex, so for the average user, it takes a while to get up to speed with it. I would like it to be more user-friendly."

"Graphics need improvement. Because a lot of the information there you have to input first in some case to have full potential. It could be more automated."

"Maybe the graphical user interface could be simplified to allow people to use it more easily. It's already good, but they can work more on it to make it even easier."

"There are some issues, in our environment that puts processing restraints on the Gigastor when turning on trending data to be sent to APEX."

"Price is always one of the factors; it's a little costlier when compared."

"They can get more integration with a few more products. They can also update some of the dashboards that are in there now."

"The tool is very good, but I feel it is very bulky."

"In terms of pricing, I have one issue with Splunk Observability Cloud; in a large-scale organization, it does not have features such as cost optimization or budgeting for observability spend."

"There's a lot of talk about AI-powered analytics and guidance in Splunk Observability Cloud. I didn't get a great sense of how much of it is actually working; there are a lot of AI hallucinations."

"I need a tool that can deal with all the security solutions that will find security monitoring compliance requirements, so I'll stick to BigFix over Splunk because I'm not that big a fan of Splunk, to be honest."

"The main improvement I would suggest for Splunk Observability Cloud would be offering the ability to implement custom apps, specifically allowing Python scripts that Splunk Cloud could host."

"Technical support is good but could be improved, particularly concerning the time taken for ticket resolution."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's quite expensive."

"It depends on the requirements you have. There are three types of license. There's the updates license, the work group license, and the workstation license."

"Splunk offers a 14-day free trial and after that, we have to pay but the cost is reasonable."

"The price of Splunk APM is less than some of its competitors."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"It is expensive."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	70

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SignalFx?

We're a customer and end-user. Currently, in France, we cannot use the artificial intelligence option. While this option is enabled for the United States and many countries, it's not yet available ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wireshark vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 9% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 6% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 5% of the time

IxChariot vs Observer GigaStor

Compared 5% of the time

More Observer GigaStor Competitors

Datadog vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Grafana vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Avantra vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Observer GigaStor

October 2026

Download Observer GigaStor product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

October 2026

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Overview

Observer GigaStor provides detailed network visibility and data capture for efficient troubleshooting and analysis. It's a robust tool designed to manage today’s complex network environments, offering reliability and performance insights.

Observer GigaStor specializes in long-term network traffic capture, delivering comprehensive forensic analysis capabilities. It stands as a trusted resource for IT departments aiming to resolve network performance issues swiftly. By capturing and storing packets with high precision, it aids in identifying both current and past anomalies, ensuring network health and performance continuity through proactive monitoring.

What are the key features of Observer GigaStor?

Long-term Data Capture: Enables storage of vast amounts of data for extensive historical analysis.
Comprehensive Protocol Support: Offers support for diverse protocols, enhancing troubleshooting accuracy.
Retrospective Analysis: Provides the ability to trace issues back to their origin point, improving issue resolution speed.
Scalability: Adapts to network growth without sacrificing performance capabilities.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from reviews?

Increased Troubleshooting Efficiency: Provides quicker resolution times, reducing network downtime.
Enhanced Network Visibility: Improves understanding of network performance and traffic patterns.
Reduced Operational Costs: Limits the need for manual troubleshooting, saving on labor costs.
Improved Decision Making: Data insights aid in strategic planning for infrastructure improvements.

Observer GigaStor's implementation spans across various industries, from telecommunications to finance, where maintaining robust and secure network performance is crucial. Its ability to analyze and retrieve historical network data supports compliance and operational stability demands in these sectors.

Viavi Solutions

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Cisco Systems, Hawaiian Telecom, Renown Health, State of Nevada, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, Allstate Insurance, Jack Henry & Associates, United States Airforce, US Bank, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Chicago Board Options Exchange

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

Observer GigaStor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

November 2026

Free Report: Observer GigaStor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Observer GigaStor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Observer GigaStor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.