OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Worksoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #37, while Worksoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 1.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Worksoft’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Processin...

Read 7 OpenText Business Processing Testing reviews

1,291 Views
1,097 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 89 Worksoft Certify reviews

8,395 Views
6,548 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Processin...

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText Business Processing Testing and Worksoft Certify compete in business process testing. Worksoft Certify has the upper hand due to its advanced features and functionalities despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText Business Processing Testing offers robust integration capabilities, automation features tailored for complex business scenarios, and re-usability of content. Worksoft Certify provides no-code automation, seamless integration with enterprise systems, and the ability to efficiently automate large-scale environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance usability for non-technical users, improve deployment efficiency, and expand its end-to-end automated testing functionalities. Worksoft Certify could benefit from reduced pricing, streamlined updates for smoother user experience, and more extensive documentation for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Worksoft Certify offers a simplified deployment process and dedicated support teams ensuring smoother transitions and integration. OpenText has a more intricate deployment process but provides strong customer guidance and service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Processing Testing presents a competitive setup cost with scalable solutions providing substantial ROI. Worksoft Certify requires a higher initial investment but offers advanced features and quicker benefit realization, making it appealing for enterprises seeking long-term ROI gains.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

37th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 3.0%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Worksoft Certify	3.0%
OpenText Business Processing Testing	1.0%
Other	96.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Revanth Reddy

Consultant at Infrasoft Technologies

Helpful solution that enables us to execute our use cases

There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be a lot easier to understand if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool.

Read full review

Muddisetty Arun Kumar

WorkSoft Certified Automation Engineer at Qualesce

Automation has delivered strong ROI with AI-driven test prioritization and parallel reporting

The best feature of Worksoft Certify is the automatic report generation. Unlike traditional tools like Selenium or Java-based frameworks where reporting often requires custom coding, Certify handles this natively. We are currently utilizing the 14.5 version, which has modernized these capabilities, though we frequently manage backward compatibility for clients still running on the 12.x version series.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that even a nontechnical tester, like a functional tester or a business analyst, can use it once the components are ready."

"The big difference with BPT over conventional frameworks with which I have worked is that BPT allows me to separate test development from automation development."

"Because everyone can create test cases, not only the quantity but also the quality is improved, which results in less defects in production."

"ROI is pretty good as the approach of framework allows virtually everyone to take part in designing test cases."

"This solution is very helpful to me, and I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."

"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."

"The BPT framework is very modular."

"We can now take test automation through the entire business process -- testing web service availability before automated test packs start, sending and retrieving data via web-services and control of all web service testing in a single tool, along with the GUI testing of business processes across a multitude of platforms from java web through to AS400 green screen terminal apps."

"We have cut maintenance testing time by 30 to 35 percent."

"Certify's web UI testing abilities for testing of modern applications like SAP Fiori was good when we started and they developed it to be even better. We all know that web applications can change objects in DOM quite fast and it breaks tests. To counter it Certify has made object recognition more flexible and generic, so we don't have any troubles."

"The Worksoft Capture feature is most valuable. For example, if you are creating a sales order in SAP, you do not need to go to each field and do everything. You do not need to write code for each and every line. You can just turn on the Worksoft Capture feature and manually perform your actions. It will capture all manual actions, and it will give you the steps. It will write the steps for you."

"Worksoft generally seems to want to make sure you are successful at what you are trying to do."

"It is highly scalable and reusable. It is easy for team members to maintain and use with confidence. There is great versatility."

"The turn around time for getting the automation tester familiarized with the tool is very quick, as it doesn't have any coding. It is fairly simple to understand."

"Worksoft has helped us position our company better because the product lets us show our value in terms of the benefits that we bring."

"The most valuable feature is its time saving, because once development is complete, the short time that it takes to execute a test is invaluable and saves a number of dollars and man-hours."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"Technical support lacks efficiency and all they do is to move in circles by opening new tickets and all the related stuffs without any intention of solving the real problem."

"To be honest, technical support is not that great."

"The only one I can really think of is speed to test execution."

"Initial releases we used of the product (v12) were a little unstable, but with the release of v12.01, we had no further issues."

"Test execution speed has been my biggest concern."

"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."

"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool."

"They have a scheduler in Execution Manager, but it is not customizable. Its UI needs a lot of improvement. The lights-out testing is a bit difficult with that particular tool, and it needs a lot of improvement. Of course, there are so many integration options with Worksoft for execution, but when it comes to Execution Manager, which is their own tool, there is a lot of scope for improvement."

"Sometimes we are facing crashes and downtime. Even our script will terminate in between the execution."

"From the features perspective, I find that there are functionalities missing in Worksoft Certify at the moment that I would like to see included in the future."

"Worksoft Certify needs a bit of improvement for its web-based processes. It can be difficult because you need to recall the maps, then you still have to add-on for your browser. When you are using the browser-based testing, you cannot even move your mouse or do anything on your system when you are using the web-based testing. Therefore, it needs a bit of improvement on that side. While it does work, it needs improvement. From the SAP side, there is nothing better than Worksoft Certify. However, from the web-based, we are moving towards Fiori. SAP will soon be totally web-based. For Fiori, they need to be great with SAP testing. Thus, Worksoft has to improve the web-based testing part for Certify."

"Upgrading Certify takes a lot of time and effort, which is like a small project by itself."

"The overall speed and performance of this solution could be improved. In a future release, it would be useful to be able to do API testing."

"The only thing I don't like - and this is the only complaint I usually have for Worksoft - is that the first-level support is not always the best for working on topics."

"The product had some UI issues."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product."

"We've saved over 80 percent in time savings."

"I can only judge based on the situation that we had around six years ago when we did the tool evaluation. Worksoft was not the cheapest, but it provided the value. For 25 concurrent licenses, we paid more than €400,000, so it was not cheap. In the end, if you see how much time you are saving and compare it with others, its price is okay. We had also compared its cost with the licensing costs for HP and Tricentis, and they were at another level. Now, as we have already booked the licenses, we only have to pay an annual maintenance fee, which is 70%, and that is okay."

"Worksoft Certify is priced higher than most tools."

"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."

"It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment."

"Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time."

"I'm not aware of any licensing costs for Worksoft Certify."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	73

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

I am not certain about the pricing of Worksoft Certify. What I heard from my peers is that it is costly, and clients will be investing more money in this software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Worksoft Certify?

Based on my experience working in Worksoft Certify and this web application, there are several things that do not work as expected in Worksoft.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 15% of the time

Zeenyx AscentialTest vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 7% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 6% of the time

Telerik Test Studio vs OpenText Business Processing Testing

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Business Processing Testing Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 14% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 12% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 5% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Qualibrate vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing

September 2026

OpenText Business Processing Testing report

Download OpenText Business Processing Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

August 2026

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Processing Testing is designed to enhance software testing processes, ensuring efficiency and quality across IT operations. It provides tools for comprehensive testing and monitoring of business processes, promoting streamlined operations.

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers a framework for executing and managing test activities in a cohesive manner. It supports automated testing, providing users with the ability to ensure that business operations align with intended functionality. The platform integrates with existing infrastructure, offering scalability and flexibility. It includes functionalities for detailed reporting and analysis, aiding in effective decision-making and process improvements.

What features make OpenText Business Processing Testing valuable?

Automated Testing: Streamlines and accelerates testing activities, freeing up resources.
Process Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into business processes for optimization.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides data-driven insights to inform strategies.
Scalable Architecture: Easily adapts to changing testing requirements.
Seamless Integration: Works with existing IT infrastructure, minimizing disruptions.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual testing.
Improved Quality: Identifies issues early, enhancing overall performance.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resources needed for testing, increasing profitability.
Strategic Insights: Gives actionable insights for better decision-making.
Adaptability: Ensures testing processes can evolve with business changes.

Industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing see specific advantages when implementing OpenText Business Processing Testing. In finance, it helps ensure compliance and secure operations. Healthcare organizations leverage it for maintaining reliable systems that manage sensitive data. Manufacturing benefits through improved process efficiency and product quality assurance.

OpenText

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Worksoft Certify report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.